Bush 'planted fake news stories on American TV'
By Andrew Buncombe in Washington
Published: 29 May 2006
Federal authorities are actively investigating dozens of American television stations for broadcasting items produced by the Bush administration and major corporations, and passing them off as normal news. Some of the fake news segments talked up success in the war in Iraq, or promoted the companies' products.
Investigators from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are seeking information about stations across the country after a report produced by a campaign group detailed the extraordinary extent of the use of such items.
( dubya's politicized, castrated FCC is going to investigate spurious news paid for by dubya? GMAFB )
The report, by the non-profit group Centre for Media and Democracy, found that over a 10-month period at least 77 television stations were making use of the faux news broadcasts, known as Video News Releases (VNRs). Not one told viewers who had produced the items.
( we've heard this before, a couple years ago. The problem is that the news corps won't tell people the news corps were as worse or much worse than Rather's fiasco )
"We know we only had partial access to these VNRs and yet we found 77 stations using them," said Diana Farsetta, one of the group's researchers. "I would say it's pretty extraordinary. The picture we found was much worse than we expected going into the investigation in terms of just how widely these get played and how frequently these pre-packaged segments are put on the air."
Ms Farsetta said the public relations companies commissioned to produce these segments by corporations had become increasingly sophisticated in their techniques in order to get the VNRs broadcast. "They have got very good at mimicking what a real, independently produced television report would look like," she said.
The FCC has declined to comment on the investigation but investigators from the commission's enforcement unit recently approached Ms Farsetta for a copy of her group's report.
The range of VNR is wide. Among items provided by the Bush administration to news stations was one in which an Iraqi-American in Kansas City was seen saying "Thank you Bush. Thank you USA" in response to the 2003 fall of Baghdad. The footage was actually produced by the State Department, one of 20 federal agencies that have produced and distributed such items.
( Orwellian, n'est-ce-pas? )
Many of the corporate reports, produced by drugs manufacturers such as Pfizer, focus on health issues and promote the manufacturer's product. One example cited by the report was a Hallowe'en segment produced by the confectionery giant Mars, which featured Snickers, M&Ms and other company brands. While the original VNR disclosed that it was produced by Mars, such information was removed when it was broadcast by the television channel - in this case a Fox-owned station in St Louis, Missouri.
Bloomberg news service said that other companies that sponsored the promotions included General Motors, the world's largest car maker, and Intel, the biggest maker of semi-conductors. All of the companies said they included full disclosure of their involvement in the VNRs. "We in no way attempt to hide that we are providing the video," said Chuck Mulloy, a spokesman for Intel. "In fact, we bend over backward to make this disclosure."
The FCC was urged to act by a lobbying campaign organised by Free Press, another non-profit group that focuses on media policy. Spokesman Craig Aaron said more than 25,000 people had written to the FCC about the VNRs. "Essentially it's corporate advertising or propaganda masquerading as news," he said. "The public obviously expects their news reports are going to be based on real reporting and real information. If they are watching an advertisement for a company or a government policy, they need to be told."
The controversy over the use of VNRs by television stations first erupted last spring. At the time the FCC issued a public notice warning broadcasters that they were obliged to inform viewers if items were sponsored. The maximum fine for each violation is $32,500 (£17,500).
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...icle621189.ece
==========
That's the English press report. We'll see if the US MSM, esp the right-wing-nut blogs, run with this story. Will the FCC do anything? Acutally, fine TV stations?
listen to this guy boutons, he knows what hes talking about
off topic, did anyone see Blackwater CEChode Prince on 60 minutes?, what a ing fakebeyond fake, smug piece of liar, you can see right through that millionaire bas
- im american and i work for america
- i value innocent iraqi life
- the military didnt perform a CSI like investigation
Already have.That's the English press report. We'll see if the US MSM, esp the right-wing-nut blogs, run with this story. Will the FCC do anything? Acutally, fine TV stations?
Not yet. I figure they'll let this first one go to court. It's a station run by Comcast if you were interested in knowing.
They barely got a slap on the hand from the FCC the last time they got caught.....
Oh, you mean politicians make video's and news releases that
are quote word for word in the MSM. Heaven forbid.
Just goes to show how careless the Mainstream Media is about checking their sources!
If Fox was accurate or not is a different story. But did I see that right? The complaint is using Fox's reporting?
It's saying the mainstream media knows exactly who their sources are.
There were no bare beasts or cuss words.
It was probably "sweeps" week.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
