Reply With Quote
I liked the ang lee version...this one looks pretty good as well.
Starring... Edward Norton?
http://incrediblehulk.marvel.com/
At any rate, it has to be better than that piece of crap that came out a few years ago!
I liked the ang lee version...this one looks pretty good as well.
That freakin' rocks!!!
that looks like a lot of ing fun, it's on THE LIST. and ed norton's a great actor too...no bill bixby...but great!
I miss Lou.
i see that they are using the music from the series.......but it still seemd a bit corny.
all comic book movies have to be a little campy...its the rules
Ah, The Abomination. We'll see...
that looks even more re ed than the crappy first movie.
bill bixby's cancer-ridded dead dirty bones are rolling in his grave.
I love Tim Roth
They dont call him Abomination
Marvel is even more desperate than I thought. Making movies for every franchise is one thing, re-making movies for characters that just came out though...
Just shows you how bad the hulk was
Looks ok, but I feel they might just need to put this movie to rest.
Ang Lee's Hulk was pretty good.
Eric Bana was pretty damn good as Bruce, and you just can't go wrong with Jennifer Conelly.
I think I like the new direction they're going as far as the storyline goes....however...I can't help but notice they went the CGI cartoony looking Hulk route which I hated from the first movie...I'm wondering if a Mr.Hyde from A League of Extraordinary Gentlemen would have worked or looked better...
I have to agree on your cgi comment on the first Hulk and ALOEG.
But, I thought the storyline of the first Hulk was pretty damn good.
Watching the trailer for the new Hulk movie . . . I'm having doubts about how realistic the Hulk and Abomination will look.
I'll still go watch the movie, though.
it was horrible. bana was horrible.
No way.
He's a damn good actor and he played that role perfectly.
Sam Elliott and Nick Nolte were also great in that movie.
I think what did that movie in was the slow pace and the cgi.
Lee could have put some more action in the movie, but it was a movie that introduced the Hulk concept. It was going to be a little slow regardless of anything else.
it was cool when he was smashing stuff. the multiple screen shots were stupid. you liked it because connelly was hot, but not naked. this should have frustrated you. the best thing about the movie was my friend saying : " I guess you don't want to make him ANGLEE"
I kinda like the multiple screen shots.
It gave the movie a comic book feel.
I kinda like the multiple screen shots.
It gave the movie a comic book feel.
Thats how I felt about it. The Story sucked balls and was its ultimate downfall. Hulk story sucked, Ghost rider was horrible and Cage was no Johnny Blaze. Elektra was the worst comic movie ever. Jane was a good Punisher but the story was weak.
I don't think the story sucked at all.
I really liked the way they worked Nick Nolte into the movie.
The whole chameleon type power was stupid. The whole fight scene with the dogs was bad ass though.
I'm intrigued by Norton's Hulk because he wrote it, and because I've always like Edward Norton and Tim Roth.
However, Norton's having big enough fights with Marvel that he has either threatened or is considering removing his name from the project (other than as its star). Marvel doesn't like his finished cut, and he doesn't want to go as cheesy as they're pushing. I'm still somewhat intrigued, but it's really not looking good at this point.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
