Reply With Quote
how many died in 7?
Was 10:45 a.m. the Originally Planned Demolition Time of WTC 7?
At 11:07 a.m. in the morning of September 11, 2001, a CNN correspondent in New York reported that a third tower had possibly collapsed. While this report was incorrect, it is interesting to note that the reporter's description could have applied to World Trade Center Building 7. This huge skyscraper was indeed the third tower to collapse on 9/11. However it did not come down until late in the afternoon, more than six hours after this report.
CNN correspondent Allan Dodds Frank reported by phone from Lower Manhattan. He described: "[J]ust two or three minutes ago there was yet another collapse or explosion. I'm now out of sight, a Good Samaritan has taken me in on Duane Street. But at a quarter to 11, there was another collapse or explosion following the 10:30 collapse of the second tower. And a firefighter who rushed by us estimated that 50 stories went down. The street filled with smoke. It was like a forest fire roaring down a canyon." [1]
WTC 7 was a 47-story tower, so would have fitted the description of the estimated "50 stories" described by Frank. And it did indeed collapse completely. One could in fact accurately describe its demise with Frank's words: "The street filled with smoke. It was like a forest fire roaring down a canyon." However, this collapse did not happen until 5:20 that afternoon.
What could have led Frank to make his incorrect report? Surely, even in the chaos of that morning, it would have been quite difficult for a mistaken report of another massive skyscraper coming down to have emerged out of nothing. Could the reason be that WTC 7 had originally been scheduled to be brought down (with explosives) at 10:45 a.m.? The incorrect information Frank reported had therefore been put out, by persons unknown, on the assumption that this would be the case. However, something--as yet unknown to us--happened that meant the demolition had to be delayed, and so Building 7 was not ready to be brought down until late that afternoon.
10:45 a.m. would certainly seem a far more logical time for the masterminds behind 9/11 to have wanted to bring down WTC 7. At that time, just 17 minutes after the North Tower had come down, the collapse of a third skyscraper would have appeared less obviously su ious. It would have been easier for those involved with covering up the truth about 9/11 to claim this collapse was simply a consequence of the two earlier ones. Instead, however, the collapse at 5:20 p.m. appeared completely inexplicable. (Unless, of course, it was a controlled demolition.)
READ MORE, WATCH THE VIDEO, OR CHECK FOOTNOTES
http://www.911blogger.com/node/15318
how many died in 7?
none officially.
There may have been one (possibly John O'Neil), or more, but have not researched the issue well enogh to know.
None died at the collapse at 5:20 however, they may have died during the morning explosions there.
Give me one good reason why the government would plant the story of a 47 floor office building collapsing ahead of the actual event.
Did they think no one would notice its falling?
CNN and the firemen are in on it!
scooby snack?
Give me one good reason why the government would plant the story of a 47 floor office building collapsing ahead of the actual event.
Did they think no one would notice its falling?
CNN and the firemen are in on it!
I've still to figure out if Galileo is dumber than nbadan or vice versa . . .
One good reason.
Crap, here we go again
Look Galileo, you seem like a nice guy and all. And you really believe your position on 9-11. That's fine, you're not alone there. If I may, I would advise you, and people like you, to make yourselves heard at the convention in Denver. Is there a Moveon-type group for Truthers? If there is, I would plan a trip there and let the delegations know your concerns about 9-11. Carry signs, give a speech or two, cause a little civil unrest, but get your message out. I'm sure the Convention will love to hear it.
by Denver, are you referring to the Libertarian Party national convention in late May?
No ... the Democratic convention. Truthers need the major parties overall, and in particular the one likely to get into the White House (Dem.) to pay attention to your message. Your message that the White House and the Pentagon engineered 9-11 is precisely what the Democrats need to hear.
Libertarians have a convention?
The LP national convention will he held in Denver over Memeorial Day weekend. Over 1000 delegates are expected to attend. I attended the 2004 convention.
The LP has six strong candidates vying for the nomination, and a few others as well that have been campaigning around the country.
The 9/11 issue will be heated as Libertarians are all over the board on this issue.
www.lp.org
I agree that the Democratic convention will be a great place to get the 9/11 Truth out. I expect hundreds of protesters to be there.
Only hundreds? Surely there will be more.
I would encourage Truthers to make their presence known at the Democratic convention. This is your chance to shine! No offense to the LP, but the Democratic convention's going to have about 1000X more exposure, and two well-known candidates.
And ... it's not like the Dem's are in bed with the White House and the Pentagon. They hate Bush.
I'm serious!
The DNC needs to let Truthers get their message out during the convention. I think them granting a speech is a pipe dream, but the Truthers need to at least be there and make themselves heard.
I'm on your side!
The Truthers need to put a loaded pistol to their temple and pull the trigger. Problem solved and the world will be a better place.
You guys thought of one good reason to plant that story early?
After six and a half years?
Yeah that's been posted before.
It still cracks me up
Translation:
"I am a Republican, and I hope that the Truthers embarass the Dems so much that they lose the presidential election"
(laughs)
I am sure you couldn't type that with a straight face...
No ... I had a straight face ...
Really! All the other protesters will be there. The Truthers ought to be there too, and make themselves heard.
Change we can believe in. YES WE CAN!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
