Reply With Quote
Not guilty.
Guilty!
Not guilty!
Don't know!
Don't care!
Is he guilty, not guilty, you don't know, or you don't care?
Not guilty.
I think he's guilty.
I'm pretty sure he's guilty. I think he was guilty when he was accused by the other child many moons ago. But he bought his way out of that one.
guilty - and the worst part is - it's going to be ALL OVER the news for months
I think he's guilty. And I think it's going to be downright horrifying to see what he looks like when he's been in prison a while without the plastic surgeons around and his nose finally falls off.
I think he is guilty.
I think it's just another case of the system holding the white man down.
So what race card do you play now? The joker?
Is there an "It" card?
I don't know, but I don't think it helps that most people view him as a weird ass.
i think he is guilty, but i also believe his mental state is such that he doesn't think he did anything wrong
if he is guilty then his mom should be convicted of something too.. she let her son sleep at a grown man's house all the time...
also, the kids mom was busted for shoplifting and then claimed the guards sexually abused her... i think she isn't credible.. she is the one bring this lawsuit...not the kid..
The parents also asked Jackson if their son could stay at Neverland with him because he had cancer. And unless I'm mistaken, this was after the original molestation charges.
I don't like him but I think he's innocent. I think he's an easy target because of his image, and I think it was probably a set up.
I think these people just want money...I think the first people wanted money and I think they wanted money this time as well, he just didn't have it this time around or maybe he's just sick of extortion.
If it was my child and I knew for a fact he was molested, there would be absolutely no way I could be bought to settle out of court, like those people were the first time around. And these people were originally trying to get money out of him as well...
I mean we are talking a of a lot of money and people that seem quite desperate.
Michael Jackson is an easy target for these types of accusations but I really don't think he's guilty.
The main reasons I think he is innocent..
A.Both times the families wanted money and the first family was clearly bought regardless of Jackson's guilt...they are ty parents no matter how you look at it.
B.It's impossible for me to believe that someone with the business a en of Michael Jackson is as incredibly stupid as he is portrayed to be in these molestation charges. Not to mention his wealth... he could go to other countries and get away with this kind of crap legally if he really wanted to do so.
Something about it just doesn't add up.
Then again maybe it's just because I can remember when Michael Jackson was just an ordinary kid with a of a lot of talent. He just doesn't seem like a genuinely bad guy to me...
I guess that's what the trial is for..and if he is guilty he needs to ing fry.
Last edited by whottt; 01-31-2005 at 08:27 PM.
Wgaf.
I'll go out on a limb and say that I think Michael Jackson is weird.
Correction White Woman
Quote by Famous Amos speaking about Michael Jackson:
"Where else but in America could a Poor Black Boy grow up to be a Rich White Woman"
Not guilty.
I think he is weird for wanting to sleep in the same bed with kids, but that does not make him a pedophile.
The mother of the kid is a low life money hungry and her past history shows that to be true, so Michael just got caught in one of her money grabbing plans.
Something else to consider... Hundreds and hundreds of kids have stayed with Jackson over the years... If claims like these are legitimate, why is it that only one or two kids at a time are making the accusation? I would think a whole wave of them would come forward.
Uh, there have been several cases of reported abuse against him. Just because only a few have seen the light of day doesn't mean very much. I don't know if these last few cases are credible. Just like Jackson is an easy target, he could choose victims that are easy targets as well. He might only choose kids that have backgrounds that could hurt them if they ever challenged him. Being that a lot of these kids are sick, poor, or are from broken homes I find it somewhat plausible.
How many people on this board sleep with children in their bed that are not theirs? Even children that are blood relatives? What about children in the age group of 9-15? Even if there was someone on this board that did that, they would not own up to it because it weird and certainly is not appropriate. It is even more odd that a person who has faced allegations of child molestation would continue with such a strange behavior.
Whottt, I don't consider Michael Jackson to be a great businessman either. How come all the reports of bankruptcy and huge loans owd out? What about the lawsuit for failure to perform of the concert. What about MJ trying to sell his Neverland Ranch property? I don't think those indicate financial prosperity.
How many were deemed credible, and what percentage does that represent compared to the hundreds of children who have visited him and support him against these allegations?Uh, there have been several cases of reported abuse against him.
I find that to be quite a stretch.Just like Jackson is an easy target, he could choose victims that are easy targets as well. He might only choose kids that have backgrounds that could hurt them if they ever challenged him. Being that a lot of these kids are sick, poor, or are from broken homes I find it somewhat plausible.
Yeah, it's weird, but it's not necessarily sexual... any moreso than you sleeping with your father or your dog as a child was sexual. Jackson clearly has a lot of affection for children, but somebody close to him needs to reign him in a bit, for his own sake.How many people on this board sleep with children in their bed that are not theirs? Even children that are blood relatives? What about children in the age group of 9-15? Even if there was someone on this board that did that, they would not own up to it because it weird and certainly is not appropriate. It is even more odd that a person who has faced allegations of child molestation would continue with such a strange behavior.
Why do you find it to be a stretch Spurm? He has thousands of kids visit him and he can pick the ones he thinks he can control. His money and fame could easily allow him to do that.
Sleeping in my parents bed when I was a little kid is FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR different than a 40 year-old man who has slept, alone and unsupervised, with many children he has no relation to. Not only that, but that he freely admits that and finds nothing wrong with it. He sleeps with kids in his bed that he hardly even knows. I would like to hear a professional opinion in regarding the types of behavior that Jackson displays and how they relate, if at all, to sexual predators.
Looking at his life - the amusement park, the exotic pets, etc - I would say that he's spent most of his life trying to reclaim the childhood that was denied him. Obviously it's left serious scars on his psyche and his soul. But my gut tells me he wouldn't go so far as to molest a child to bring it back.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
