They would have missed the playoffs completely if they played that borderline re ed wop.
They would have missed the playoffs completely if they played that borderline re ed wop.
Hair's difference. SMH
14-2 vs likely 7-9 isn’t a hair’s difference. They came out flat for the playoffs but that happens a lot, and it’s happened to Flacco as well.
Why do fans of ringless franchises act like winning in the playoffs should be so easy?
so they would have played 1 less game bfd.
Fans of teams that haven’t rang in forever acting like playoff wins come easy
I was referencing your cuck-like behavior and the comparison to blake.
I agree that Jackson shined in the reg. season. That doesn't matter for much if he's choking in the postseason.
Flacco would've been the better option tonight.
Also at Pat bandwagon now 49er bandwagon boy trying to boast of a higher level of understanding based on his fandom selection.
Pretty much.
Although if Harbaugh wouldn't have been so hasty and had put Jackson in a Taysum Hill role, the Ravens might still be alive right now.
Your rooting for a team that regularly s the bed in the playoffs should have taught you that winning in the playoffs is ing hard, and having a “lost in the playoffs, whatever might as well have just gone 1-15” is such a re ed at ude to have.
Yeah, can't believe how quick people are to dismiss Flacco's greatness in the playoffs, like it was easy to win all those playoff games (especially on the road).
Flacco isn’t in his prime anymore. He’s absolutely terrible now. Do you think the Niners should bring Joe Montana back to start next week because of all his playoff success?
It's taught me that there's no excuse for choking. Do you see me here making excuses for the Vikings choking?
Do you think he's good enough to throw for better than 50 completion percentage and 90 yards? Or would that be too much to ask?
The Ravens are so stacked, they went 14-2 with a QB who can't throw a football. They would have made the playoffs with Flacco and not gotten embarrassed tonight.
Do you think the Vikings should have just gone 6-10 cuz who ing cares if they didn’t win it all?
Flacco got outplayed by the Broncos dog backups
to be fair though, the Ravens were winning games last year with Flacco, they just decided to make the move to *pizzazz* up their offense, and it did for awhile but the gimmick died in the playoffs, and the same for this year.
I think they have a top 5 offensive line and a lot of QBs would look good and plus their running game is special. But if Yanda retires and others get shuffled around that offense could stink up the joint and they could be an 8-8 or so team next year.
Guys like Slob were chalking that up to luck at the time.
They went 4-5 with Flacco and 6-1 with Lamar. And Lamar played because Flacco got hurt, not to “pizzazz” the offense. Please stop talking out of your ass
I think they should've gone 14-2 and got the home field advantage and the bye they needed. But I admit that the odds of that happening were under ten percent. But that's where I saw this team's chances of having a track for winning the Super Bowl. That's basically what the Ravens did; but then they didn't a QB who could manage a playoff game well. He made a case for Kurt Cousins being the better option FFS.
So Cousins is a better QB because he failed to get a first round bye and hypothetically could have game managed the Ravens to a win tonight?
Yup. They made a choice based on a small sample size.
And again, I don't even say I think the choice was "wrong" in the long run.
I'm just noting the obvious reality that the proven QB may have got it done tonight; whereas the unproven QB didn't.
Why does Joe Flacco's composure trigger you?
I'm not saying Cousins is better outright. But he did manage to not play like a head and get his team a playoff W.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)