Apparently part two of his interview is tomorrow night
Parnas singing like a canary...
pos barr
pos trump
pos nunes
cue comrade TSA hustling in here with
parnas liar convict
lololol
Apparently part two of his interview is tomorrow night
Anderson Cooper?
Barr needs to be impeached also
What does McCarthy know?
Still don't know why you're laughing, this evidence comes from an actual subpoena. What's your conspiracy now? That Congress is planting fake evidence?
Yeah, not how it works. They wouldn't be replacing the current POTUS if he's removed, so the point is moot. Plus, this is not a judicial trial, but a political one, which is the main reason POTUS won't be removed.
i say we go down the rabbit hole. all dems and republicans have to recuse themselves because of bias.
leaves bernie
there's a parallel SDNY/FBI criminal track. Nunes is in it up to his neck.
https://www.newsweek.com/devin-nunes...bidens-1473765
No one claimed that George.
Your point is moot.
How about just the Senators running for POTUS.
This isn't a legal proceeding, there's no need for anyone to recuse. It's an all hands on deck situation for both sides.
A fake scruple which, if applied, would weaken only one side.
How convenient.![]()
If I have to watch 9 hours of coverage after I get home from work and the gym, getting to bed at like 2 AM each night.. Well I won't be.. Good Luck Dems..
1) No
2) No
1) there was a formal process that had already screened ukraine and Congress approved the money AFTER the ukraine had cleared ALL its hurdles and the funds were officially approved.
2) Biden followed official Govt policy and your premise is bull . Biden pushed for a prosecutor who followed the law - got rid of the corrupt one. Your cult leader WANTS the corrupt people there because then they will allow corruption like USA bribery & extortion from the Trump rogue criminals.
Trump didn't suspect corruption.
Joe Biden was not a corrupting influence.
Parnas good now
This evidence comes from a lying fraudster. When did he write the note? Be specific. Coming from a subpoena doesn't make the note true. Parnas is clearly trying to get a reduced sentence.
Wow, TSA really hates Trump's associates who were just trying to do Trump's bidding.
Where's your loyalty, TSA?
omg there's a parallel SDNY/FBI criminal track
links to a possible congressional ethics investigation![]()
TSA, how many people around Trump need to be in legal jeopardy before you admit there MAY be a problem with the people Trump chose to put around him?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)