"Muh Sweden."

[DMC]

<((((((((><

[pgardn]

Popular tactic for the left here: Interject then use "not me" when called out even though you're defending the argument. Seeking reward without risk.

Im not defending anything here.
Im saying a poster does not know what he is claims to know.
So when you make disingenuous conclusions about what I am doing you get it wrong.
Keep going old man.

[pgardn]

According to you, someone I already illustrated as being mentally unstable with an agenda of scientific self promotion.

But you dont keep up with my ramblings because they make you look bad.
You dont keep up but you do respond.

Keep going old man.

[ChumpDumper]

DMC gets angry when he's called out on his bull . Never has takes of his own on any actual issue. He's desperate to make things personal.

[pgardn]

DMC gets angry when he's called out on his bull . Never has takes of his own on any actual issue. He's desperate to make things personal.

And the thing is the majority of people who post on this site regularly have been wrong or misinterpreted something before.
"My bad, I misread or was flat out wrong"
People cant type this.
One has to wonder if the Orange God has influenced this "never wrong" adherence.

[ChumpDumper]

And the thing is the majority of people who post on this site regularly have been wrong or misinterpreted something before.
"My bad, I misread or was flat out wrong"
People cant type this.
One has to wonder if the Orange God has influenced this "never wrong" adherence.

It's pretty much all Trump supporters who do this.

They also can't admit they're Trump supporters because that may mean being wrong about something somewhere.

[tholdren]

And the thing is the majority of people who post on this site regularly have been wrong or misinterpreted something before.
"My bad, I misread or was flat out wrong"
People cant type this.
One has to wonder if the Orange God has influenced this "never wrong" adherence.

Just waiting for you to admit you were wrong about the virus and the lockdowns and being able to use science

[ChumpDumper]

Just waiting for you to admit you were wrong about the virus and the lockdowns and being able to use science

Just waiting for you to show the number of hospitalizations and deaths science gives for no lockdowns at all.

[DMC]

Popular tactic for the left here: Interject then use "not me" when called out even though you're defending the argument. Seeking reward without risk.

Im not defending anything here.
Im saying a poster does not know what he is claims to know.
So when you make disingenuous conclusions about what I am doing you get it wrong.
Keep going old man.

[TheGreatYacht]

[DMC]

Just waiting for you to show the number of hospitalizations and deaths science gives for no lockdowns at all.

So you think acts should be taken because of lack of evidence they don't work?

[ChumpDumper]

So you think acts should be taken because of lack of evidence they don't work?

When did I say that?

I asked for numbers. Calm down. your narratives.

[DMC]

DMC gets angry when he's called out on his bull . Never has takes of his own on any actual issue. He's desperate to make things personal.

another who can never be wrong while debating you, eh? Oh the huge manatee!

[DMC]

When did I say that?

I asked for numbers. Calm down. your narratives.

You'll never lay claim to a narrative but it's obvious you have one started already. I just shot it down. Now you're denying it like a bas child.

[ChumpDumper]

anther who can never be wrong while debating you, eh? Oh the huge manatee!

you don't debate anything.

[DMC]

you don't debate anything.

Not with you, since you never provide a rebuttal, just more questions and narrative shifts.

[ChumpDumper]

You'll never lay claim to a narrative but it's obvious you have one started already. I just shot it down. Now you're denying it like a bas child.

I'm asking you when I said I think acts should be taken because of lack of evidence they don't work.

I'd like a link to the quote.

[ChumpDumper]

Not with you, since you never provide a rebuttal, just more questions and narrative shifts.

You never even enter a debate. All you do is throw from your perch on the fence and try to make it personal.

[ChumpDumper]

tholdren's position is the no lockdown was necessary in the entire US. I'm under the impression that no lockdowns at all would've led to more deaths so I wanted to know what the numbers would have been with no lockdowns. I can't give an exact marker, but say the number of deaths was ten more than they currently are; I would agree that is evidence the lockdowns were not necessary.

Ideally, numbers would be calculated for each state that locked down.

If such numbers are not available, I'd like for him to say they are not available.

Somehow asking for information is a personal attack to people like tholdren and DMC.

Sorry.

[tholdren]

Just waiting for you to show the number of hospitalizations and deaths science gives for no lockdowns at all.

I already gave it your just too dumb to understand the cdc release and the icfr graph... here's the really stupid part... you keep asking for any data. Bwahahahhaa

[DMC]

*autistic screeching and incessant whining*

Ok Bill Nigh, the Science Lie

[DMC]

I already gave it your just too dumb to understand the cdc release and the icfr graph... here's the really stupid part... you keep asking for any data. Bwahahahhaa

Same when he asked for my argument, I gave it in the next post and he went on all night and into the next day asking for it.

Dude is on a 17 year full tilt gig.

[ChumpDumper]

Same when he asked for my argument, I gave it in the next post

Really?

There have been a lot of posts since then. I'll ask for a link again.

[ChumpDumper]

I already gave it your just too dumb to understand the cdc release and the icfr graph... here's the really stupid part... you keep asking for any data. Bwahahahhaa

Walk me through it because I didn't see the numbers I asked for.

[tholdren]

Walk me through it because I didn't see the numbers I asked for.

Lol because you don't understand how to read.