bwahahahhahaha wrong about the virus.
called it
I said everyone would be wearing masks back i February
called it
bwahahahhahaha wrong about the virus.
pgardn with the Wild Cobra schtick.
No, actually you didn't. "grimly note" is pretty much the opposite of "giddy".
You ing lying sack of .
Covid less dangerous than flu to a majority.
You clearly avoided answering the question, as asked, and answered a question I did not ask.Do you think that available hospital space is important to considering how much to attempt to reduce the R0 value? Why or why not?
Dishonest people avoid honest questions.
3rd time
Do you think that available hospital space is important to considering how much to attempt to reduce the R0 value? I will settle for a simple yes or no.
You said Sweden locked down. They didn't. Thats a lie.
Hospital space is important, but irrelevant with the data that was on hand. There was no need for extra space as was confirmed by the extreme failure of the models and the proof being furloughs and hospitalization.
That would be like shutting down and bringing in ships every flu season and saying that there is a capacity problem.
Not a very good question by you. Models wrong just admit. Less than flu for a majority.
Dishonest people avoid honest questions.Do you think that available hospital space is important to considering how much to attempt to reduce the R0 value? Why or why not?
4th time
Do you think that available hospital space is important to considering how much to attempt to reduce the R0 value for any disease that might require hospitalization for some percentage of those affected with a disease? I will settle for a simple yes or no.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 05-28-2020 at 08:55 AM. Reason: clarity
No not in the context of covid. As was proof by what resulted.
You are still grasping for hypotheticals that have been proven false. Which I can now understand why you are afraid of the media. I am sorry you feel this way. You will survive.
https://www.learnreligions.com/avoid...uestion-250358When trying to make a case for some position or idea, we frequently encounter questions which challenge the coherency or validity of that position. When we are able to adequately answer those questions, our position becomes stronger. When we cannot answer the questions, then our position is weaker. If, however, we avoid the question altogether, then our reasoning process itself is revealed as possibly weak.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 05-28-2020 at 09:44 AM.
Dishonest people avoid honest questions.Do you think that available hospital space is important to considering how much to attempt to reduce the R0 value? Why or why not?
I removed the question from a specific context so that we can arrive at a potential mutual agreement of principle, on which to base further discussion.
5th time [clarifying language added]
Do you think that available hospital space is important to considering how much to attempt to reduce the R0 value for any disease that might require hospitalization for some percentage of those affected with a disease? I will settle for a simple yes or no
The press is in business to sell ads, not be objective and tell truth.
Some of the press will not sell adds if they are relied upon for accuracy, or a fair accounting of the current state of the situation.
The entertainment press which has captured many on this site is a different story.
My belief is there is good stuff out available, you just have to sift through it to find legit info.
Truth.
Outrage sells ads.
Wait, so you have to decide which information is true by sifting through until you find something you agree with? That's what people here do everyday. It's why Boutons posts relentlessly, for decades, no one reads, and why RG keeps dropping articles from confirmation bias hits on his echo chamber radar.
If you already know the truth, why do you go looking for it? You either want updated stats or the opinions of experts. While the stats are supposed to be factual, gathering methods are not consistent and tend to be driven by political and/or financial motives. The opinions of experts seem to change daily. So you're getting a snapshot of a chaotic system and as Heisenberg said, you just don't know the truth (something like that, I didn't see every episode).
You and a few others here like to move the goalposts every other response. You keep trying to lodge a "w" from the discussion, and you abandon your prior statements in favor of new ones in a "ya but" fashion. No one is obligated to follow your descent into oblivion. Give up your original statements then move on to other ones, don't just pretend you never made such claims.
Bad news sells ads
and there won't be any bad news about the we-can't-piss-off the advertisers
Nope. When I wrote
"Do you think that available hospital space is important to considering how much to attempt to reduce the R0 value? I will settle for a simple yes or no." I was thinking "generally for any disease".
Re-reading it, there appeared to be some ambiguity, so I made it explicit and clear.
Just because you are inherently dishonest, does not mean everyone else is.
The fact that you habitually use strawman lies about what others believe is enough for any reasonable person to conclude you are inherently dishonest.
It is possible to advocate for any given view point by only posting information that does not support that viewpoint? Yes or no.
Do all those ER visits happen at once?
Can you go back and your mother some more yes or no?
I've already explained to you Mr. Variables that NO it didn't for this virus. proven by events such as furloughs layoffs and no hospitals being whelmed.
If there was a vius that was highly lethal and highly communicable then maybe.
You ask stupid questions. Are you saying all these covid people got into a bus and went there at the same time?
How cute.
The two dumb s combine to make one dumb .
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)