Lol ChumpDumper and RandomGuy say there's no issue with backlogging data. Lol
Man o man.
Shocked not more from those two about this with the hospital concern and all....
SA with more positives today than Harris and Dallas counties.![]()
Lol ChumpDumper and RandomGuy say there's no issue with backlogging data. Lol
Man o man.
Shocked not more from those two about this with the hospital concern and all....
Lol perfect timing bwahahahahahhahahahah
This message is hidden because tholdren is on your ignore list.
oh he got me. Using that science and the block button. Bwahahahhahahaha karen mad cause she didn't really have the virus like she said. But it was added to the new cases. Lol TimDunkem.
Just to keep the truth going for ChumpDumper who warned us all of the dangers
When you post, I don't read it. You're an idiot
Well thats a lie. You read it because you responded.
You were wrong. Lol completely and utterly wrong. Quick post a fire meme. Lololololol
This question is not for you.
This is for the board graphing expert.
It does not in anyway need to be a graph associated with the current situation.
Please read the post AGAIN.
There is a question. Discuss.
I should make this clearer.
Find the context of the data
So you hand out lengths of wire to people and ask them to measure the lengths.
No, i give them the link to the raw data so that they can start to measure lengths themselves.
How do you gather the raw data and measure the uncertainty in your data before you give it to them?
I dont give them anything. They can take the data and do whatever they see fit, but they do not. And thats the point. It's gossip.
I comment on trends and how the data is collected and reported. Which are facts.
YOU CAN measure your own uncertainty bud.
Your FACTS have uncertainty embedded in them then.
You asked me to ask you a question and now you stray from exactly what I was asking you about.
No. The facts are facts.
Not if they are measured data.
Sorry but they have a range of uncertainty.
There is no uncertainty that your username is theoldren, that is a fact.
You really dont get it.
You don't get it. I explained that I just showed them the raw data collected and comment on the trends of that data. Those are indeed facts.
The bias behind collecting the data used, you are correct, is not a fact.
It's ironic you are asking me these questions but not looking at the actual data collected and asking the state.
pgardn taking his turn on the tholderp rodeo
He quit. He was trying to get me to say that I was generating data and didn't have error built in. He was too excited that he didn't read that I am only stating facts based on what is reported
I still haven't been proven wrong
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)