Nope, foldren fold, as usual, you know, no math, no links, no El Paso.
"We're being very mean to our mother Earth. Now order me a hundred billion disposable masks."
Nope, foldren fold, as usual, you know, no math, no links, no El Paso.
Mask differential of 50%
Use your words and don't lie.
Tell us all what the study was about.
Or fold.
Lolooooooloolkoooo
Chumpdump doesn't understand
Bwahahhahahahahhahahaja
^folden lies. Just like when he lied about Australia and Brazil.
I understand perfectly.
That's why you're afraid to say what they actually studied.
Loloooookokkkkkllllook
Chumpdump can't read. And the only random trial on masks proves no statistical difference.
Yet he has said for months science proves masks work
WRONG
you're afraid to say what they tested.
As always.
Why do you have to lie every single time?
fldren still afraid to say what was actually studied.
Keep hiding.
Chumpdump lied about science
you're lying about what was studied.
Why do you have to lie every single time?
No I'm not. Only random trial with masks and covid.
You said masks were science. You lied. Per usual. Now you get caught and you cry.
What was actually studied?
So if people are getting tested based on being exposed to someone who tested positive, what about being exposed to an asymptomatic person who hasn't been tested? If you have an asymptomatic person being exposed to another asymptomatic person, you now have two positive spreaders who weren't tested, and the people they come into contact with aren't going to be tested pre-symptoms.
Shouldn't everyone be tested regularly?
0 rct. Sorry 1. Doesn't prove.masks work.
But but but the science
What was actually studied?
Be honest, lieboi.
lieboi can't discuss science
Why are you so afraid of science and me?
lieboi still afraid of science and me.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)