Reply With Quote
Lol desperateAlabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and South Dakota have just joined Texas Scotus case over the election. Probably more as I write this.
Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and South Dakota have just joined Texas Scotus case over the election. Probably more as I write this.
Lol desperateAlabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and South Dakota have just joined Texas Scotus case over the election. Probably more as I write this.
is it common for pleading to be this stupid?
"More states are joining in! I know SCOTUS slapped our last case but this is the one! MOAB incoming you'll see!"
Lol the whole Dixie south plus the bikers in SDAlabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and South Dakota have just joined Texas Scotus case over the election. Probably more as I write this.
No laughing matter, tbh.
The parade of sore losers will point to their own tantrum and the gale of bitter Republican tears as pretext for passing more restrictive voting laws -- to restore the faith in elections they undermined by filing dozens of frivolous election challenges.
not dismissed. but disposed of on the merits. unanimously. and all 7 justices were appointed by republican governors
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-c...-3939735-0.pdfThe Court concludes, unanimously, that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the request to continue the hearing and permit additional inspection of the ballots. The November 9, 2020 hand count audit revealed no discrepancies in the tabulation of votes and the statistically negligible error presented in this case falls far short of warranting relief under A.R.S. § 16-672. Because the challenge fails to present any evidence of “misconduct,” “illegal votes” or that the Biden Electors “did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,” let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results, the Court need not decide if the challenge was in fact authorized under A.R.S. § 16-672 or if the federal “safe harbor” deadline applies to this contest.
Therefore, IT IS ORDERED affirming the trial court decision and confirming the election of the Biden Electors under A.R.S. § 16-676(B).
"Muh, maybe if I add more states, it'll make my request more valuable"
"Muh, maybe if I add more states, it'll make my request more valuable"
This would be like California and New York suing Texas because a dem lost that state.
God the GOP is ing pathetic. What little es.
So you're saying there was a chance.
Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and South Dakota have just joined Texas Scotus case over the election. Probably more as I write this.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
derp
