Whine more, can you?
There will be ng about it but that is just a sideshow. The play will be a storied play in Spur's lore like Strickland's pass and Fisher's .4. The entire sequence and how it unfolded is worth revisiting. Carping that will occur is a side issue to the play that is one of the milestones in Spur's history.
Chumpdumper's comments were priceless.
That was funny!
Typical Spursfans complaining and Mavfans take the high road by whining while winning.
Bravo.
We're done here.
Too funny for words!
![]()
![]()
![]()
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
wake me up when this is over.
Last edited by themanurules; 06-16-2006 at 12:41 PM.
So we really need 15 more pages of:
"Dirk hooked him."
"No he didn't. Bowen is dirty."
"No he isn't. Dirk's a flopper.
"No he isn't. Manu is King Flopper."
"No he isn't. Cuban is gay."
"You wish, . You can't breathe on Duncan without a whitsle."
Riveting.
[QUOTE=ChumpDumper]So we really need 15 more pages of:
Algorithm of how to have an endless and futile Spurs/Mavs argument:
"Dirk hooked him."
"No he didn't. Bowen is dirty."
"No he isn't. Dirk's a flopper.
"No he isn't. Manu is King Flopper."
"No he isn't. Cuban is gay."
"You wish, . You can't breathe on Duncan without a whitsle."
Repeat ad nauseum.
Doesn't matter. What's the difference how many pages. I guess if it was the Jordan Utah shot to close the series that should just be ignored too because there was some controversy.
I'm waiting patiently for the retort which will again throw another thread into a Mavs/Spurs tangent that has no bearing on what's happening in the NBA today. From there, names will be called, fouls will be scrutinized and someone will inevitably be called a pussy. Thread will be locked shortly thereafter, but another will pop up in a matter of minutes.
I don't think he's saying that he necessarily disagrees with you (nor do I necessarily), but this is just going to be as productive and satisfying as
you're (pick an insult)
I know you are, but what am I
.....
And since this has already been hashed and rehashed and nothing new is likely to be discovered or said in this process and nobody will shift positions, it seems like the space and time could be better used. I think that's what he's getting at.
LEONARD you said if they called that they would call 90% of the plays hooks. What cons utes a callable hook in your opinion? What about that play made it pedesterian compared to a hook that would be called?
I'll give this to pic, he's persistent.
Maybe Kori will unlock the thread later, but I simply don't see anything productive coming from it. Maybe in time there could be a civil discussion about the calls and rules, but now just seems too soon.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)