I was hoping for this too, but d
on't you remember EricB's post where he said he heard from someone in the organization that there is no way they're trading Patty? 
. This is pretty disheartening if they're not willing to move him just because he's a "good guy". When did this start happening? It sure wasn't the case back in 1999 to about 2005. The Spurs had no problem cutting anyone that didn't perform, or anyone that didn't fit in towards winning games, so why are they clinging to certain players now? What changed? I have the same at ude as back then, why has Pop gone soft since then and clings to players that aren't very good?
For example, Patty has sucked for about 3 years (since getting that ridiculously overpriced contract that I still think Kawhi saw along with the Gasol one and said " this." I think that is the point where he started thinking about leaving), but is playing well to start this season for the first time in a long time. It's also a contract year, so if someone makes any kind of decent offer, I'd trade him immediately. I don't understand why they wouldn't consider this. 13-15 good games to start this season off Vs 3 ty years, what's there to keep? He'd be better off on a team competing for the Championship. He's worthless to the Spurs IMO if they want to get back into contention. He's not going to get us there, he's only going to hamper other players developing by eating up their minutes.