Russian bounties placed on US soldiers led to deaths

[hater]

"Low to moderate confidence"


jesus ing christ

Thats Totalitarian Newspeak translation for: "we have no ing evidence but I guess its possible, anythings possible"

[Ef-man]

If hater can read this section and take away that it means that russia was not involved, anyone can read it and take away that it says "hater sucks s." And I can prove it!



“The United States intelligence community assesses with low to moderate confidence that Russian intelligence officers sought to encourage Taliban attacks U.S. and coalition personnel in Afghanistan in 2019 and perhaps earlier,” a senior administration official said.

“This information puts a burden on the Russian government to explain its actions and take steps to address this disturbing pattern of behavior,” the official said, indicating that Biden is unprepared to walk the story back fully

Nailed it!

[hater]

Nailed it!

I have low to moderate confidence you are currently sitting on an 8 inch dildo.


This puts a burden on you to prove me wrong.

[Ef-man]

I have low to moderate confidence you are currently sitting on an 8 inch dildo.


This puts a burden on you to prove me wrong.

Hater hurt
Nailed it!


I have low to moderate confidence you are currently sitting on an 8 inch dildo.


This puts a burden on you to prove me wrong.

[ElNono]

Hater didn't write the clickbait tweet, tbh... he just ran with it.

[hater]

Hater hurt
Nailed it!


I have low to moderate confidence you are currently sitting on an 8 inch dildo.


This puts a burden on you to prove me wrong.

I have low to moderate confidence you are currently sitting on an 8 inch dildo.


This puts a burden on you to prove me wrong.

Burden remains and by your reaction its moving closer to moderate

[Ef-man]

Hater hurt
Nailed it!


I have low to moderate confidence you are currently sitting on an 8 inch dildo.


This puts a burden on you to prove me wrong.

[ElNono]

Plus, it's actually encouraging this was investigated thoroughly and the results aired out, regardless of the outcome or how it makes X or Y look.

If they happen to report the opposite they reported, then we'll hear CIATimes and NSAWapo excuses anyways, tbh...

[hater]

Plus, it's actually encouraging this was investigated thoroughly and the results aired out, regardless of the outcome or how it makes X or Y look.

If they happen to report the opposite they reported, then we'll hear CIATimes and NSAWapo excuses anyways, tbh...

Bull

We knew it was bull from the moment they said anonymous sauces and "from a tortured taliban prisoner"


I called it on day 1

Ther rest was all theatrics

[hater]

Womp womp womp

"and now you know from this report in the NYT since confirmed by WSJ...THAT NOT ONLY DOES THE PRESIDENT KNOW THAT RUSSIA WAS PAYING FOR THESE AMERICAN SOLDIERS DEATHS...." - Ralph Maddow

"he (Trump) is not even there yet... Hes still saying that the REPORTING ABOUT THE FACT(THE FACT ) THEY WERE OFFERING THESE BOUNTIES IS FAKE " - Ali Velshy

"ITS UNBELIEVABLE, JOANNE" - ler

"...reporting that Russis had bounties on the heads of american soldiers. Do you know what a bounty is? Is somebody puts a price on your head and they will pay it if you are killed! " - Kopmala Harris

[ElNono]

Bull

We knew it was bull from the moment they said anonymous sauces and "from a tortured taliban prisoner"

I called it on day 1

Ther rest was all theatrics

This doesn't contradict one word I said, and you lapping it up doesn't either. I didn't even say you were wrong.

This administration could've easily buried the conclusions of the report since it arguably makes them look bad and choose not to.

Not sure how you can spin that into a negative. Contrast with Barr stonewalling redactions of the Mueller report on obstruction for years, for example.

[hater]

This doesn't contradict one word I said, and you lapping it up doesn't either. I didn't even say you were wrong.

This administration could've easily buried the conclusions of the report since it arguably makes them look bad and choose not to.

Not sure how you can spin that into a negative. Contrast with Barr stonewalling redactions of the Mueller report on obstruction for years, for example.

The investigation started way before this administration. And as I said after day one it became all theatrics. Secrett sauces, tortured afghan blah blah blah. It was bull since day 1. Yet watch the video I posted of the entire media and politicians (kopmala) taking this as facts.

Everything went wrong with this bull since day one. It was yet another propaganda fake news hoax operation from the very beggining. You can pretend it was a legit investigation but youre just fooling yourself in the end.

[ElNono]

The investigation started way before this administration. And as I said after day one it became all theatrics. Secrett sauces, tortured afghan blah blah blah. It was bull since day 1. Yet watch the video I posted of the entire media and politicians (kopmala) taking this as facts.

Everything went wrong with this bull since day one. It was yet another propaganda fake news hoax operation from the very beggining. You can pretend it was a legit investigation but youre just fooling yourself in the end.

I'm not getting in the way of you calling dibs, I think that's perfectly fair.

But the point stands: this administration could've easily told the MSM and/or intel services to keep their mouth shut and didn't, despite it can certainly be interpreted as a black eye on them.

It doesn't excuse any actions by anybody, past or present. I do think it's laudable.

[Spurtacular]

Bull

We knew it was bull from the moment they said anonymous sauces and "from a tortured taliban prisoner"


I called it on day 1

Ther rest was all theatrics

Chumpettes aren't required to be skeptical. They only have to chirp.

[hater]

I'm not getting in the way of you calling dibs, I think that's perfectly fair.

But the point stands: this administration could've easily told the MSM and/or intel services to keep their mouth shut and didn't, despite it can certainly be interpreted as a black eye on them.

It doesn't excuse any actions by anybody, past or present. I do think it's laudable.

They couldnt keep their mouths shut. U act as if they had a choice.

If reporters ask they had to give an answer. And if they doubled down on the hoax they had to give details. Thats because the sanctions were supposed to close the loop.

U really think if Biden admin could have kept the Russia Bountyhoax under wraps they wouldnt?

I have a bridge to sell u in Chispiritoland

[ChumpDumper]

Turns out there was no reason not to investigate after all.

[hater]

Turns out there was no reason not to investigate after all.

1980chump

[Ball Buster]

[ChumpDumper]

But the war is not being prolonged.

[hater]

Or if you would have reading spurstalk and the poster called hater

[Ball Buster]

[Ball Buster]

But the war is not being prolonged.

Over 20 years in Afghanistan

[ChumpDumper]

Over 20 years in Afghanistan

What was just announced?

[hater]

[SnakeBoy]

So they didn't walk it back... right on the linked article:

“The United States intelligence community assesses with low to moderate confidence that Russian intelligence officers sought to encourage Taliban attacks U.S. and coalition personnel in Afghanistan in 2019 and perhaps earlier,” a senior administration official said.

“This information puts a burden on the Russian government to explain its actions and take steps to address this disturbing pattern of behavior,” the official said, indicating that Biden is unprepared to walk the story back fully.

We admit this story is bull but Russia has the burden to disprove it