Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678910 LastLast
Results 176 to 200 of 250
  1. #176
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Post Count
    261
    The problem with Jakob, is that on a good playoff team, he's proably the 4th or 5th best player on that team. His role is to be a defensive anchor, which he does a damage good job. He's one of the best defensive C in the games, while giving us a 12/8. I can also gurantee most poster who are indenial, that Jakob, besides a handful of teams is a stater a starter on most nba a team, he might not be an all-star, what he's one of those high end staters. I bet you the lakers would gladly have him starting, the Warriors probably to, Boston would as well, and many other that are in need of what he brings.

    Now, lets be clear, we not a top 4 team, at best we're looking at the 7th/8th or play in, and a team like this, Jakob probably is our 3rd best player, behind Murray and White. Potel isn't a loser, he hasn't won anything? well he plays on the Spurs, if he was on a team getting attention, he be in considereration for second all defesive team.

  2. #177
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Post Count
    261
    Also since this Board is about Jock, lets keep it about jack, take the Jakob stuff to his Board.

    I think Jock is more a strech 4 than strech C. He doesn't have the strength and height to hold his own against bigger centers.

  3. #178
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Post Count
    24,896
    Treys were not going down last night.

    But the threat still stretches the floor.

  4. #179
    Veteran John B's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    12,402
    Also since this Board is about Jock, lets keep it about jack, take the Jakob stuff to his Board.

    I think Jock is more a strech 4 than strech C. He doesn't have the strength and height to hold his own against bigger centers.
    Jock is 6’11” 7’2” wingspan and 256 lbs. He’s big enough. He needs to get accustom to NBA speed and replace Jakob in the starting line-up

  5. #180
    Veteran KobesAchilles's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Post Count
    4,089
    Jock is 6’11” 7’2” wingspan and 256 lbs. He’s big enough. He needs to get accustom to NBA speed and replace Jakob in the starting line-up
    Agreed

  6. #181
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Also since this Board is about Jock, lets keep it about jack, take the Jakob stuff to his Board.

    I think Jock is more a strech 4 than strech C. He doesn't have the strength and height to hold his own against bigger centers.
    How about we talk about stuff where we want since you've been here for all of 2 days, yeah?

  7. #182
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    This is the problem I see with a lot of the posters here. Just because Poodle is getting paid less doesn’t mean he should only play so much. And anything more is already beyond his salary? F%ck that argument I get that in the office and that guy is packing his bags. “This is all that you’re paying me for.” Geez I hate people like that. I’m not saying Poodle says that, but he did hint in his interview before about getting paid less. I agree Spurs got a great deal for a starting center gig, but that’s beside the point. Play aggressive, dunk the ball, finish with contacts and hit them free throws. I wouldn’t be critical if I didn’t think he’s capable. I’m no professional, but I’ve played basketball all my life. I just don’t see Poodle giving it all, exactly like a Poodle all barks, no teeth
    But he doesn't play to do only so much. He plays like a ing beast. That's the point.

  8. #183
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    Thats kinda how it works doesn’t it? Kawhi wouldn’t have won basically anywhere else. But he went to the best franchise in sports and won a championship. You think the Pistons would’ve developed him the same way we did? The Twolves? Where you land plays a huge part of you’re a winner or loser. Mac Jones is gonna be in the playoffs as a rookie while Trevor Lawrence isn’t going to even sniff the playoffs for a while (if ever at all). So to act like you’re surprised that where you land determines your career is weird.

    And is Perkins less talented? In what way? Everything people praise about Jaks game is exactly what Perk did for the Thunder. If anything, you are showing bias against Perk bc you are a Spurs fan and not a Thunder/Celtic fan. To this day, Celtic fans claim they would’ve won the 2010 championship if Perk didn’t get hurt. Perk =Jak so why do you say he is immensely less talented?

    You said that Jak deserves NO blame for us not being in the playoffs. You said he is a top 10 center and we have bigger things to worry about. You also said he needs more talent around him for his team to succeed.

    Im saying Jak DESERVES to blamed for us not being a playoff team. He isn’t good enough to make us one. That in itself deserves blame. Everyone on the team deserves blame for us sucking, just in varying degrees. I also said the exact same thing that if you are going to be successful with Jak as your starter then you need better talent around him. I think Jak is a problem on the team bc he kinda makes us complacent as fans. He’s good enough to where you can see the positives in his game, but there will always be a low ceiling to our teams if he is our starter. He is just that bad on offense. It’s not even the ppg but just that his defender clogs the lane all the time. Jak has yo physically move his man out of the way every time somebody drives bc of this fact. But he can’t do that every play bc that’s exhausting. If he had literally a 8 foot Oberto jump shot he would be so much better on offense. Instead he refuses to work on his shot
    Well, see? That's your problem. You think Perkins is similar in talent to Poeltl.

  9. #184
    Veteran John B's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    12,402
    But he doesn't play to do only so much. He plays like a ing beast. That's the point.
    No he doesn’t. Admit it. Everybody here, well almost everybody, says he doesn’t play physical enough. Sean is practically begging him to dunk the ball

  10. #185
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    Im saying Jak DESERVES to blamed for us not being a playoff team. He isn’t good enough to make us one. That in itself deserves blame. Everyone on the team deserves blame for us sucking, just in varying degrees.
    Well, he's the one that deserves the least blame out of everyone on the roster.

    I also said the exact same thing that if you are going to be successful with Jak as your starter then you need better talent around him. I think Jak is a problem on the team bc he kinda makes us complacent as fans. He’s good enough to where you can see the positives in his game, but there will always be a low ceiling to our teams if he is our starter. He is just that bad on offense. It’s not even the ppg but just that his defender clogs the lane all the time. Jak has yo physically move his man out of the way every time somebody drives bc of this fact. But he can’t do that every play bc that’s exhausting. If he had literally a 8 foot Oberto jump shot he would be so much better on offense. Instead he refuses to work on his shot
    lol son, that's such bull .

    No, the low ceiling of our team isn't because of Jak. The low ceiling is because of the other 4 starters. Jak would be a starter on 75% of the other NBA teams. Heck, he would even be a starter on the Warriors and make them better. What other player on the Spurs can you say that about?

    Poeltl only weakness is his jumper, he can't shoot. That's it. But guess what, many centers in the NBA can't shoot. It isn't a vital skill to have at that position, even in today's NBA. Aside from that, Jak gives you pretty much everything. Elite rim protection, defense on the perimeter, pick and roll defense, mobility and agility for a big man, great passing and vision, finishing, and a high IQ overall. You clearly have a problem apreciating all the things Poeltl can do on a basketball court. Start searching for anywhere else to blame on the Spurs being a lottery team, because Poeltl isn't it, tbh.

  11. #186
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    No he doesn’t. Admit it. Everybody here, well almost everybody, says he doesn’t play physical enough. Sean is practically begging him to dunk the ball
    Yes. Yes, he does.

  12. #187
    Veteran KobesAchilles's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Post Count
    4,089
    Well, see? That's your problem. You think Perkins is similar in talent to Poeltl.
    Perk successfully guarded Duncan, peak Dwight, and Gasol in the playoffs. Jak has guarded… nobody. I get that you’re not an nba fan (only a Spurs fan) and that 2010 was a down year for us where we got swept by the Suns. But there are other basketball teams you know. Perk literally played the role of Jak and he was damn good at it. So it’s kinda funny seeing you on him.

  13. #188
    Veteran KobesAchilles's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Post Count
    4,089
    Well, he's the one that deserves the least blame out of everyone on the roster.



    lol son, that's such bull .

    No, the low ceiling of our team isn't because of Jak. The low ceiling is because of the other 4 starters. Jak would be a starter on 75% of the other NBA teams. Heck, he would even be a starter on the Warriors and make them better. What other player on the Spurs can you say that about?

    Poeltl only weakness is his jumper, he can't shoot. That's it. But guess what, many centers in the NBA can't shoot. It isn't a vital skill to have at that position, even in today's NBA. Aside from that, Jak gives you pretty much everything. Elite rim protection, defense on the perimeter, pick and roll defense, mobility and agility for a big man, great passing and vision, finishing, and a high IQ overall. You clearly have a problem apreciating all the things Poeltl can do on a basketball court. Start searching for anywhere else to blame on the Spurs being a lottery team, because Poeltl isn't it, tbh.
    I hope he calls you for his HOF speech then the way you talk about him. He would start on the Warriors and make them better! Sure they have the best record in all of basketball but they would be better

    He would start over AD and Jokic and Gobert and Porzingas and Ayton and Towns

  14. #189
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    14,854
    Mostly agree with DAF86's sentiments about Poeltl, but he's not a top 10 center . . .

    Inarguably better: Jokic, Embiid, Davis, Gobert, Towns, Adebayo, Ayton, Allen, Sabonis

    Arguably better: Vucevic, Porzingis, Capela, Turner, Valanciunas, Horford, Williams, Wood, Jackson Jr., Mobley

    As for Murray being a top 10 PG this season, fair enough. In the grand scheme . . .

    Inarguably better: Curry, Paul, Lillard, Irving, Young, Morant, (LaMelo) Ball

    Arguably better: Gilgeous-Alexander, Holiday, Conley, Lowry, Van Vleet, Garland, Fox, Haliburton
    Last edited by TD 21; 12-29-2021 at 04:36 PM.

  15. #190
    Veteran offset formation's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,729
    How come these type of comment haven't died yet? Imagine still not realizing Jak is a top 10 center in the NBA.
    Uh, because he is (or was the last time I looked) 23rd in PER amongst NBA centers, is shooting <36% from the FT stripe, despite being 7'1" often plays below the rim to his offensive detriment (and to many's frustration), and generally has an embarrassing offensive game beyond 5 feet out?

    His above average defense and offensive rebounding are the only thing keeping him on the floor as a starting center.

    But acting as if he's irreplaceable or worthy of fealty is very spurstalky. In fact Jock does all of Jacob's deficiencies better, in fact MUCH better, but is simply not as polished a defender. If he improves there, it'd be a no-brainer to cut bait with Poeltl.
    Last edited by offset formation; 12-29-2021 at 12:02 AM.

  16. #191
    Veteran offset formation's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,729
    Mostly agree with DAF86's sentiments about Poeltl, but he's not a top 10 center . . .

    Inarguably better: Jokic, Embiid, Davis, Gobert, Towns, Adebayo, Ayton, Allen, Sabonis

    Arguably better: Vucevic, Porzingis, Capela, Turner, Valanciunas, Holmes

    As for Murray being a top 10 PG this season, fair enough. In the grand scheme . . .

    Inarguably better: Curry, Paul, Lillard, Irving, Young, Morant, (LaMelo) Ball, Gilgeous-Alexander

    Arguably better: Holiday, Conley, Lowry, Van Vleet, Murray, Garland, Fox
    Lol. Valanciunas isn't arguably better. He's demonstrably better. As are most of those others.

  17. #192
    Veteran KobesAchilles's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Post Count
    4,089
    Uh, because he is (or was the last time I looked) 23rd in PER amongst NBA centers, is shooting <36% from the FT stripe, despite being 7'1" often plays below the rim to his offensive detriment (and to many's frustration), and generally has an embarrassing offensive game beyond 5 feet out?

    His above average defense and offensive rebounding are the only thing keeping him on the floor as a starting center.

    But acting as if he's irreplaceable or worthy of fealty is very spurstalky. In fact Jock does all of Jacob's deficiencies better, in fact MUCH better, but is simply not as polished a defender. If he improves there, it'd be a no-brainer to cut bait with Poeltl.
    Thank you. Dude is saying the guy is a hall of famer. Calls him a winner when he’s never won When Jak goes against an actual competent big man he gets roasted. We need to cut bait with him

  18. #193
    Veteran KobesAchilles's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Post Count
    4,089
    Mostly agree with DAF86's sentiments about Poeltl, but he's not a top 10 center . . .

    Inarguably better: Jokic, Embiid, Davis, Gobert, Towns, Adebayo, Ayton, Allen, Sabonis

    Arguably better: Vucevic, Porzingis, Capela, Turner, Valanciunas, Holmes

    As for Murray being a top 10 PG this season, fair enough. In the grand scheme . . .

    Inarguably better: Curry, Paul, Lillard, Irving, Young, Morant, (LaMelo) Ball, Gilgeous-Alexander

    Arguably better: Holiday, Conley, Lowry, Van Vleet, Murray, Garland, Fox
    Irving hasn’t played this season so he’s out. Conley sucks this year and so does Lowry. Van fleet can’t guard multiple positions the way Murray can. And Lillard has turned into an overrated chucker. Dude is shooting 40% from the field and will probably drop to the 30s soon. Also I like Shay but he’s not better than Murray

  19. #194
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    14,854
    Lol. Valanciunas isn't arguably better. He's demonstrably better. As are most of those others.
    Counting stats without context.


    Irving hasn’t played this season so he’s out. Conley sucks this year and so does Lowry. Van fleet can’t guard multiple positions the way Murray can. And Lillard has turned into an overrated chucker. Dude is shooting 40% from the field and will probably drop to the 30s soon. Also I like Shay but he’s not better than Murray
    He's still active and about to play, so he's in. Conley has been good. Lowry has dropped (but I'll give him more time before saying it's inarguable). Gilgeous-Alexander should arguably being in the arguably category.
    Last edited by TD 21; 12-29-2021 at 04:37 PM.

  20. #195
    Veteran gambit1990's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    9,767
    Mostly agree with DAF86's sentiments about Poeltl, but he's not a top 10 center . . .

    Inarguably better: Jokic, Embiid, Davis, Gobert, Towns, Adebayo, Ayton, Allen, Sabonis

    Arguably better: Vucevic, Porzingis, Capela, Turner, Valanciunas, Holmes


    i'm taking jock over jakob if i had to (not that i want jock playing the 5 full time). jock has that fire.

  21. #196
    Veteran gambit1990's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    9,767
    remember how good manu made blair look? damn, i wish jock got to play with manu, both have that fire. fire is unteachable.

  22. #197
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    Uh, because he is (or was the last time I looked) 23rd in PER amongst NBA centers, is shooting <36% from the FT stripe, despite being 7'1" often plays below the rim to his offensive detriment (and to many's frustration), and generally has an embarrassing offensive game beyond 5 feet out?

    His above average defense and offensive rebounding are the only thing keeping him on the floor as a starting center.

    But acting as if he's irreplaceable or worthy of fealty is very spurstalky. In fact Jock does all of Jacob's deficiencies better, in fact MUCH better, but is simply not as polished a defender. If he improves there, it'd be a no-brainer to cut bait with Poeltl.
    "23rd in PER"

    What a dishonest bull argument.

    1st- PER sucks
    2nd- There's a bunch of guys averaging 10 mpg ahead of Poeltl on that list.
    3rd- Poeltl is actually averaging a great PER number.

    And nobody is acting as if Poeltl is irrepleceable. He's a center making 9 millions per year.

    He's much better than some of you mofos realize though, that's for sure.

  23. #198
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    Perk successfully guarded Duncan, peak Dwight, and Gasol in the playoffs. Jak has guarded… nobody. I get that you’re not an nba fan (only a Spurs fan) and that 2010 was a down year for us where we got swept by the Suns. But there are other basketball teams you know. Perk literally played the role of Jak and he was damn good at it. So it’s kinda funny seeing you on him.
    Perkins is a dinosaur from another era where you could have no basketball talent whatsoever and just get by being a bully and fouling 6 times per game. He would have never made it on today's NBA.

    Poeltl is a highly skilled big which was selected 9th overall for a reason. I repeat, Poeltl isn't the problem here, the problem is your inability to properly asses all the positive things Jak can do on a basketball court.

  24. #199
    Veteran KobesAchilles's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Post Count
    4,089
    Perkins is a dinosaur from another era where you could have no basketball talent whatsoever and just get by being a bully and fouling 6 times per game. He would have never made it on today's NBA.

    Poeltl is a highly skilled big which was selected 9th overall for a reason. I repeat, Poeltl isn't the problem here, the problem is your inability to properly asses all the positive things Jak can do on a basketball court.
    I said the positives of Poeltl but your problem is that you think his huge negative isn’t a huge negative at all. His problem is that his defender cheats off of him and clogs the paint for our guards who are already meh dribblers. He has zero offensive game other than being spoon fed and even then he doesn’t finish strong enough quite often. This is a big negative. When Poeltl isn’t pushing and shoving his man out of the way for people he is useless on offense.

    Also besides being more mobile than Perk, what other skill does Jak have over Perk? Perk manned the paint pretty damn well back in his day too. Jak struggles against real big men while Perk held his own defensively against them.

  25. #200
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    I said the positives of Poeltl but your problem is that you think his huge negative isn’t a huge negative at all. His problem is that his defender cheats off of him and clogs the paint for our guards who are already meh dribblers. He has zero offensive game other than being spoon fed and even then he doesn’t finish strong enough quite often. This is a big negative. When Poeltl isn’t pushing and shoving his man out of the way for people he is useless on offense.

    Also besides being more mobile than Perk, what other skill does Jak have over Perk? Perk manned the paint pretty damn well back in his day too. Jak struggles against real big men while Perk held his own defensively against them.
    Pretty much any skill there is. Passing, vision, offensive rebounding, touch around the rim, positioning and just overall understanding of the game. It is hard to discuss these things when you are clearly so blind to them.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •