Page 61 of 67 FirstFirst ... 1151575859606162636465 ... LastLast
Results 1,501 to 1,525 of 1651
  1. #1501
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    That is such nonsense. That bonus was 150k. That is such a rounding error in any NBA trade. You are smarter than this.
    If the bonus is indeed that small I agree with you. Where's that info.

  2. #1502
    Veteran R. DeMurre's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    4,126

    Don’t know if you’ve been keeping up, but the bench time for Thad was pretty intentional. We wanted to flip him to a playoff team, but he had a playoff bonus in his contract. He needed a certain amount of games played, and it is now impossible for him to meet the threshold. Holding him out made it easier to trade him.
    It's understandable that the Spurs were in rebuild mode, but also understandable that Thad would've been upset wasting half a season this late in his career...

  3. #1503
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    328
    Thad got benched because he publicly whined. Doesn't look like strategy or some sort

  4. #1504
    Veteran JeffDuncan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    3,045
    If the bonus is indeed that small I agree with you. Where's that info.

    The earlier post is incorrect according to spotrac. Their info looks like this:

    2021-22: LTBE: $0, ULTBE: $1,000,000 (>= 64 regular season games + wins/playoffs + 24 MPG, All-Defense, All-Star, Most Improved Player)

    ULTBE=Unlikely To Be Earned

    It was 1M but required 64 games at 24 min/gm, or better, and the playoffs. I’m not familiar enough with their notation to be sure what “wins/playoffs” means, precisely. Or he could have earned it by being named MIP, All Star, or All Defense.

    That was part of his contract which the Spurs inherited. It was the same for all three years.

    It was never taken into account for his playing time by the Spurs. That’s a silly notion. Thad did not get playing time for exactly the reason both Thad and Pop publicly stated. The Spurs are rebuilding, and they had to give the minutes to the younger players, to assess the team’s situation. Thad was not part of the Spurs future plans, too old.

    If the Spurs had started strong, and raised serious playoff hopes, Thad might have played a lot. Didn’t happen.

  5. #1505
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    If the bonus is indeed that small I agree with you. Where's that info.
    If Sportac can be trusted, Thad had a $1-Million playing time bonus where he had to play in at least 65 games and average at least 24 MPG in those games (or basically win superstar awards in other areas). Last year, Young BARELY qualified for that, meaning it was factored into his cap number this season. While him missing the bonus didn't change anything for the Spurs, the incentive does get recalculated as part of a trade. So when he was going to be dealt to Toronto, his play-time bonus was reevaluated and reclassified as unlikely, and his cap number reverted to just his base salary. That meant he went from counting as $14.1 Million on the Spurs' outgoing ledger to $13.1 Million on Toronto's incoming ledger.

    To be clear, Thad wasn't getting any of that million in his checks. The checks are for his base salary. Wasn't going to get paid $150k or whatever and now won't. It's just that neither Toronto nor SA will have to cut him a check this year.

    To be clearer, this doesn't mean that Ex is wrong about if Young had a specific bonuses for the various markers that total up to $1 Million and Sportac is just not breaking it down. I just haven't seen that specific breakdown anywhere.

  6. #1506
    Veteran JeffDuncan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    3,045
    ... That meant he went from counting as $14.1 Million on the Spurs' outgoing ledger to $13.1 Million on Toronto's incoming ledger. …

    That appears to be incorrect. Thad is currently showing for Toronto at $14,190,000 base salary (of which $4.8M remains to be paid.)

  7. #1507
    Formerly Spurs21 KingKev's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Post Count
    5,928
    Bobby Marks has been cited as saying his games played + playoff bonus for this year was 150k, 1 million total was probably if all of the above happened with each piece additive to his compensation package.

    Regardless Thad’s bonus was not a deciding factor in his role with the Spurs.

  8. #1508
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    That appears to be incorrect. Thad is currently showing for Toronto at $14,190,000 base salary (of which $4.8M remains to be paid.)
    While I reserve the right to be wrong, I think Young's incentives not being corrected is a more likely explanation.

  9. #1509
    Veteran RC_Drunkford's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Post Count
    14,781
    who cares, all that matters is we also got rid of Drew Eubanks. Killed 2 birds with 1 stone here

  10. #1510
    Veteran JeffDuncan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    3,045
    who cares, all that matters is we also got rid of Drew Eubanks. Killed 2 birds with 1 stone here

    Ditto, it was very nicely done, to move Eubanks like that.

  11. #1511
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447
    The Athletic NBA @TheAthleticNBA




    The Hawks had various conversations centered on Ben Simmons, CJ McCollum and Derrick White, sources tell @ChrisKirschner. The Spurs were set on Bogdan Bogdanovic and a first-round pick for White, but Atlanta wasn't interested in that deal. More: theathletic.com/3125368/?sourc…



    4:01pm · 11 Feb 2022 · Twitter Web App

  12. #1512
    Mostly good takes Dverde's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    4,162
    10684703[/URL]] The Athletic NBA @TheAthleticNBA




    The Hawks had various conversations centered on Ben Simmons, CJ McCollum and Derrick White, sources tell @ChrisKirschner. The Spurs were set on Bogdan Bogdanovic and a first-round pick for White, but Atlanta wasn't interested in that deal. More: theathletic.com/3125368/?sourc…



    4:01pm · 11 Feb 2022 · Twitter Web App

    Spurstalk clutching their precious John Collins candles and the Spurs didn’t even want him.

  13. #1513
    Veteran Dejounte's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    15,644



    Everyone was on the same page in the front office

  14. #1514
    Veteran K...'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    8,229
    Spurstalk clutching their precious John Collins candles and the Spurs didn’t even want him.
    I'm sure they knew atlanta's price for collins and it required picks the other way.

  15. #1515
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    The Spurs are seemingly desperate to make Johnson work as the PF. I don't mind them not wanting to play two traditional bigs, but I really hope they're willing to consider a bigger wing for that spot. They realized Derrick wasn't a keeper. That's good. They need to be willing to do the same thing with Keldon.

  16. #1516
    Veteran KobesAchilles's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Post Count
    4,089
    The Spurs are seemingly desperate to make Johnson work as the PF. I don't mind them not wanting to play two traditional bigs, but I really hope they're willing to consider a bigger wing for that spot. They realized Derrick wasn't a keeper. That's good. They need to be willing to do the same thing with Keldon.
    I feel like KJ is a keeper. But off the bench. You don’t get rid of guys who shoot the ball like him and have the drive he has. He has a lot of flaws physically but his energy, hustle, toughness, and shooting are things we all need.

  17. #1517
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    The Spurs are seemingly desperate to make Johnson work as the PF. I don't mind them not wanting to play two traditional bigs, but I really hope they're willing to consider a bigger wing for that spot. They realized Derrick wasn't a keeper. That's good. They need to be willing to do the same thing with Keldon.
    unless keldon moves to the sf and vasell to sg/sf... then we have a big backcourt lineup...

    just need a real fkn big down low...any big would do doesnt matter if he cant shoot the 3...

  18. #1518
    Formerly Spurs21 KingKev's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Post Count
    5,928



    Everyone was on the same page in the front office
    or Pop has less of a say or care about on his way out. Either way he won’t publicly critique his coworkers. Pop needs to coach whoever BW brings in from here on out. Pop would never have made those trades if he was in charge though.

  19. #1519
    Formerly Spurs21 KingKev's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Post Count
    5,928
    I feel like KJ is a keeper. But off the bench. You don’t get rid of guys who shoot the ball like him and have the drive he has. He has a lot of flaws physically but his energy, hustle, toughness, and shooting are things we all need.
    Normalize all of this with Keldon’s rookie extension at <15mm a year and I agree.

  20. #1520
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    The Spurs are seemingly desperate to make Johnson work as the PF. I don't mind them not wanting to play two traditional bigs, but I really hope they're willing to consider a bigger wing for that spot. They realized Derrick wasn't a keeper. That's good. They need to be willing to do the same thing with Keldon.
    Keldon is playing there out of necessity/lack of team talent at that position. Want to see him in a better role like super sub off bench before moving him, but I do think he is the next guy up with positive value that could fetch something in the trade market.

  21. #1521
    Veteran RC_Drunkford's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Post Count
    14,781
    The Spurs are seemingly desperate to make Johnson work as the PF. I don't mind them not wanting to play two traditional bigs, but I really hope they're willing to consider a bigger wing for that spot. They realized Derrick wasn't a keeper. That's good. They need to be willing to do the same thing with Keldon.
    nah they just need a real PF so Keldon can slide to SF and McDermott goes to the bench. That would fix most issues on this team

  22. #1522
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Spurstalk clutching their precious John Collins candles and the Spurs didn’t even want him.
    I would bet good, hard money the Spurs have never, ever been interested in John Collins. It was purely ST imagination.

  23. #1523
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Keldon is playing there out of necessity/lack of team talent at that position. Want to see him in a better role like super sub off bench before moving him, but I do think he is the next guy up with positive value that could fetch something in the trade market.
    Johnson is not playing PF out of necessity. The Spurs have gotten rid of almost all of their forwards and seemingly were looking for a guard in return for White regardless. I agree about the rest of the post, but dude is a four, and if he played with some bulky 6-9 guy next to him, the Spurs would be playing two PFs.

  24. #1524
    Believe. PhantomDashCam's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    2,656
    The Spurs are seemingly desperate to make Johnson work as the PF. I don't mind them not wanting to play two traditional bigs, but I really hope they're willing to consider a bigger wing for that spot. They realized Derrick wasn't a keeper. That's good. They need to be willing to do the same thing with Keldon.
    I don’t agree with this at all.
    Derrick wasn’t traded because he wasn’t a keeper, he was traded because the package was in the Spurs favour when thinking of the team’s current standings and ceiling moving forward.

    Keldon has already improved tremendously as a perimeter shooter, in an off-season with Olympic duties and significant team turnover. Why are we betting against him shedding a few lbs and improving his perimeter Defense?

    KJ may always be somewhat of a tweener but that’s no reason to move him.

  25. #1525
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    I don’t agree with this at all.
    Derrick wasn’t traded because he wasn’t a keeper, he was traded because the package was in the Spurs favour when thinking of the team’s current standings and ceiling moving forward.

    Keldon has already improved tremendously as a perimeter shooter, in an off-season with Olympic duties and significant team turnover. Why are we betting against him shedding a few lbs and improving his perimeter Defense?

    KJ may always be somewhat of a tweener but that’s no reason to move him.
    Not being a keeper doesn't mean DW isn’t a good player....it just means he's not who we should build around based on age and style of play next to others on the team....it's not a knock on him...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •