Reply With Quote
Lol, the only person holding Lonnie Walker back is Lonnie Walker. Gmafb
Horrible. No ne else will come here, so sign a mentally fragile, timid guard. Nope, all day.
Lol, the only person holding Lonnie Walker back is Lonnie Walker. Gmafb
Yeah he had his one year try out and I don't think it worked out he did better at the end but to be honest the last 40 games we played maybe 7 of those teams had a record above 500. So balling out against Portland, Orlando, and Houston, doesn't really tell me much of a player when your basically going against G League players
He really didn’t improve, they just increased his volume of scoring opportunities.
A little hyperbolic but I feel you. Ive said worse about Lonnie. I’ve been voicing my disappointment with Lonnie up to this point in his career (not online but just with other Spurs fans) so it’s not like I don’t understand most Spurs fans being done with him. I’m just trying to be practical here. He’d be re-signed most likely to come off the bench. I’m not seeing the gravity here. If he walks, fine, but no one is going to give him a big contract so I actually think he’s likely to return. I’m not a Lonnie advocate I’ve already stated this. But thinking the money could be “better spent” in the hopes of maintaining enough salary cap space for a high level free agent? It ain’t happening.
Again, if drafting Ivey, Davis, or Mathurin is enough to let Lonnie go so be it. I’m not saying this is you, but this whole message board mentality of “We know what he is at 23” is just ridiculous. Look how many on here were upset with the Murray contract at the time. Now it looks great. With the Poeltl contract. Now it looks like a bargain. Probably the same people will be upset with the KJ extension…and for what? A big name free agent that was never going to come to San Antonio. Drafting and player development is the only chance we have.
So I agree a lot with your last paragraph but lonnie should not be brought back even for the minimum. This is not so much a money issue currently as it is numbers game. we already have to many guards/sf. Walker is not a pg so he couldnt even play there. Currently I have us at 6 sg/sf and that is not counting Wieskamp but does count langford, kj and even mcdermont as sg/sf. I dont count think these can play pf except in rare situations. this leaves no time for him to play as if he plays he takes time away from others.
As for as your second paragraph So many people are still down on Murray and I dont get it. I think it is more because they dont take the time to actually look at the team and just want to chase big names.
Walker isn't the problem. Because if he leaves, we will still have to deal with popovich's bull
Pop did treat him roughly in the beginning, I imagine because he saw a glimmer of star potential and tried to push him to be great. Worked well for Parker, but didn't work out that well for Lonnie, but Lonnie probably wasn't going to be great regardless. I can see both sides to this, but I think Lonnie got enough of a chance this year and it just hasn't worked out. We're looking for stars, and his role is still kinda iffy. A microwave scorer should be his role. Maybe it can still happen. But we have so many damn guards, it's a tough sell to commit much to him. He'd have to be like a 9th man moving forward to give other players a chance. Is that worth it?
No thank you………. Pay Malik not Lonnie
I wonder if Lonnie will be going live with NBA TV again this summer, during the draft. Last year, he seemed surprised with the Primo pick; if the Spurs grab another wing or guard, Lonnie would have to suspect the writing is on the wall.
Nah, Lonnie's reads are so slow he'll be on another team for half a year before the writing on the wall sinks in.
Safe to say re-signing is not happening.
I think there’s a decent chance he stays, especially if they trade Richardson. Also if the Spurs really view Primo as a primary ballhandler, which wouldn’t be surprising since it was his initial role on the team last season, and in Austin as well. Not convinced Keldon can survive as a wing either. With Wesley likely spending the whole year in the g league this leaves plenty of room and minutes for Lonnie.
imo it will depend on what the Spurs will do with Wesley next year even if Branham is part of the roster.
IMO one of J rich and Walker will be gone for sure but not necesseraly both. The spurs could also made Jones available to clear rotations with Primo maybe playing some PG and Wright saying Wesley could play some point.
No reason to bring Walker back at any cost.
A sign and trade would be nice, but I seriously doubt that happens. With an already crowded backcourt, so so stats, and 2 guards being drafted, its a good bet that Walker is history.
They literally just drafted two replacements. And, with Sochan sliding into the PF, everyone gets knocked down a position, and there is even more compe ion a the 2 and 3 spots for minutes.
Neither of which will contribute much this coming up year. It is beneficial for both the Spurs and Walker to sign a one year deal. He started showing significant improvement after White was traded, and he was given a consistent role. I personally still feel he has the highest ceiling, and we may be prematurely throwing in the towel with him. Far as I can see confidence is what is holding him back.
He didn’t show any improvement at all. His defense was still atrocious, his offensive game is still the same as it was when he first entered. He’s had his chances.
I agree he stepped up later in season and now has another off-season to put in more work...I'm intrigued by what he could be come regular season
If he hasn’t become it in four full seasons, he won’t. The only thing that changed last year was that his usage increased. He was no better. In fact his 3 point shot fell off a ing cliff.
I understand the against Lonnie without a doubt but he really played like 2 full seasons. First year he did not play and second he barely played.
Saying that is not true. Between year 2 and 4 he goes from 6 ppg to 12 ppg, from 1 apg top 2 apg with just + 7 minutes per game. We could say that the % are not great but not that he didn't improves.
More than that i understand if the Spurs let him go but imo it's not the best outcome when after 4 years of development a guy starts to pan out a little bit. I'll give him a little contract for 2 years maybe TO the second year and if that's not good i trade him or let him go..
he will be who he always was, Walker won't improve magically. He's gone
I think Lonnie, if he does develop, is going to be one of those players who develops later in his career. A Stephen Jackson or Jonathan Simmons or Danny Green.
He's very skilled in a lot of respects and seems to be well coached, but is so far away from putting it all together. He's inconsistent and only seems to come out when it doesn't matter. Like the game isn't natural for him and he doesn't seem to particularly enjoy it. I've never watched a game and seen Lonnie do something that matters. Even someone like Langford has had more flashes than Lonnie.
This means we can't have him on the team at anything other than a very low developmental, prove-it contract rate. We have way too much promising talent on the team at his position to pay him to take up space and time. His only role can be as the hungry 15th man who needs to prove he belongs in the league, and Lonnie likely needs to be treated that way to develop. Coddling him won't help.
100% truth. Maybe we can do a sign and trade with him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions