Ukraine

[ChumpDumper]

Why are all these Muslim handled twitter accounts acting like they are on the front lines of Ukraine?

[ChumpDumper]

Time to give peace a chance. This is not looking good.

Special Operation bad now.

[hater]

After 6 ing months of playing with your balls. 8jg Greg Putovich.


Smdh

[velik_m]

[horseshue]

Zelensky has grown so much as a leader during this war.

[hater]

"When your enemy is killing its civilians who share ethnicity with you. You start a military operation. But leave your enemy with full internet, power and hot water." - Greggory Putovich

[ChumpDumper]

hater's attempt to turn on Putin isn't working.

[hater]

hater's attempt to turn on Putin isn't working.

Say what? Putin is a great human and top 5 all time peace time leader. But hes soft. He just wears mittens. And ma niga Lavrov is similar or worse.

[ChumpDumper]

Say what? Putin is a great human and top 5 all time peace time leader. But hes soft. He just wears mittens. And ma niga Lavrov is similar or worse.

you think he's not genociding enough

[DMC]

Of course Zelensky has food, water, power and gas. It's his countrymen who do not.

[ChumpDumper]

"Churchill never actually fought on the beaches in World War II."

-- derp

[DMC]

It's obviously so much more than that, and comparing it to Afghanistan is really not understanding anything about geopolitics.

It goes beyond just Russia and includes China as well, and will dictate who are going to be the power brokers in this world in the future, which has a direct impact into people, whether the parts care about it right now or not.

And so, as part of the group of people, you have to look at what each side stands for. The western democracies are definitely not perfect, but I'll take them over what Russia or China are politically selling.

You're repeating yourself. The US isn't at war with Russia. The false dichotomy of being under Russian/Chinese control if Russia succeeds or being under Western democratic control if Ukraine pushes Russia back is just a convenient way to pick sides. I get it, but the US isn't in this for any such grandiose purposes. It's about keeping strategic superiority to maintain the wealth for the wealthy interests, first strike capability for nuclear deterrence and allies along Russia's border, where the US can launch sorties. Because Ukraine has behaved basically how the US would dictate they behave, they are a strategic asset. Let's not forget the wrangling done by the current and previous admin with Ukraine.

The US itches for war. We'll get involved with all conflicts where we can gain some strategic or financial advantage, and it's never too late to claim patriotism and the salvation of democracy as a reason. The only difference is the cheering audience, based on the color of the flag flown by the current admin, blue or red.

[DMC]

…yes!

now i hope you not that when making an analogy or comparison, im not literally calling them rapists and rape victims. This has been an issue with you on multiple occasions already

You try too hard for haymaker comments that often miss the mark, and in your loss of balance recovery attempt, you blame your target for moving. A rape analogy is unnecessary to say "someone being attacked will swing anything they can get their hands on, but that doesn't mean it's ok to attack someone with anything you can get your hands on". You went the rape route because you lack basic common ing sense.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You're repeating yourself. The US isn't at war with Russia. The false dichotomy of being under Russian/Chinese control if Russia succeeds or being under Western democratic control if Ukraine pushes Russia back is just a convenient way to pick sides. I get it, but the US isn't in this for any such grandiose purposes. It's about keeping strategic superiority to maintain the wealth for the wealthy interests, first strike capability for nuclear deterrence and allies along Russia's border, where the US can launch sorties. Because Ukraine has behaved basically how the US would dictate they behave, they are a strategic asset. Let's not forget the wrangling done by the current and previous admin with Ukraine.

The US itches for war. We'll get involved with all conflicts where we can gain some strategic or financial advantage, and it's never too late to claim patriotism and the salvation of democracy as a reason. The only difference is the cheering audience, based on the color of the flag flown by the current admin, blue or red.

They want to join NATO and have publicly said so. Their stated desire is to join the western alliance. Putin wants Ukraine to be a junior partner like the USSR was as he has written about extensively.

Outside of us saying they cannot use are weapons on Russian territory what have we dictated to them? or anyone in the West for that matter.

And there is a military industrial complex with a hugely powerful lobby but your monolithic description is just another case of you needing to dumb things down to "understand" something.

[DMC]

They want to join NATO and have publicly said so. Their stated desire is to join the western alliance. Putin wants Ukraine to be a junior partner like the USSR was as he has written about extensively.

Outside of us saying they cannot use are weapons on Russian territory what have we dictated to them? or anyone in the West for that matter.

And there is a military industrial complex with a hugely powerful lobby but your monolithic description is just another case of you needing to dumb things down to "understand" something.

Again, your opinion is worthless. That doesn't need to be dumbed down you pedantic child.

[ChumpDumper]

You're repeating yourself. The US isn't at war with Russia. The false dichotomy of being under Russian/Chinese control if Russia succeeds or being under Western democratic control if Ukraine pushes Russia back is just a convenient way to pick sides. I get it, but the US isn't in this for any such grandiose purposes. It's about keeping strategic superiority to maintain the wealth for the wealthy interests, first strike capability for nuclear deterrence and allies along Russia's border, where the US can launch sorties. Because Ukraine has behaved basically how the US would dictate they behave, they are a strategic asset. Let's not forget the wrangling done by the current and previous admin with Ukraine.

The US itches for war. We'll get involved with all conflicts where we can gain some strategic or financial advantage, and it's never too late to claim patriotism and the salvation of democracy as a reason. The only difference is the cheering audience, based on the color of the flag flown by the current admin, blue or red.

The dichotomy is being under Russian control or not being under Russian control.

It's all the same to you, but not to us.

You pride yourself on not having any actual opinions on anything and trying to hate on people who do.

Tough .

Your non-opinion is worthless.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Again, your opinion is worthless. That doesn't need to be dumbed down you pedantic child.

You sure want it to be. You really are not my audience. If you want to let me refute your nonsense and only come back with this then I am fine with the dynamic.

The dichotomy - pedantic child- is shown by objective facts and people can see how you dumbed it down. Characterizing the US as a monolithic personality is really, really dumbing things down.

[DMC]

You sure want it to be. You really are not my audience. If you want to let me refute your nonsense and only come back with this then I am fine with the dynamic.

The dichotomy - pedantic child- is shown by objective facts and people can see how you dumbed it down. Characterizing the US as a monolithic personality is really, really dumbing things down.

Tell me more.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Tell me more.

That's better. The sarcasm gives an impression that you don't care. Too bad you didn't lead with that.

You have abandoned the argument so my work here is done.

[Ef-man]

The dichotomy is being under Russian control or not being under Russian control.

It's all the same to you, but not to us.

You pride yourself on not having any actual opinions on anything and trying to hate on people who do.

Tough .

Your non-opinion is worthless.

muh russia's military might is on par with China and US

[ElNono]

Sad times coming. Looks like TOSB Greg Putovich has decided to finally hit the Ukro power and water plants.

After 6 ing months of diddling around like a .

NATO when they bombed Serbia, they destroyed the utilities the first ing day. This mother er

Its very sad that Ukranian civilians on East will start suffering. But thats what hapoens when both sides wont negotiate.

Time to give peace a chance. This is not looking good.

Terror state doing terror state things

[Spurs Homer]

Too bad Hater and TSA's god is not as popular at home anymore;



https://www.yahoo.com/news/moscow-of...030517069.html

[ElNono]

You're repeating yourself. The US isn't at war with Russia. The false dichotomy of being under Russian/Chinese control if Russia succeeds or being under Western democratic control if Ukraine pushes Russia back is just a convenient way to pick sides. I get it, but the US isn't in this for any such grandiose purposes. It's about keeping strategic superiority to maintain the wealth for the wealthy interests, first strike capability for nuclear deterrence and allies along Russia's border, where the US can launch sorties. Because Ukraine has behaved basically how the US would dictate they behave, they are a strategic asset. Let's not forget the wrangling done by the current and previous admin with Ukraine.

As a member of the West, of course it is. That's why the US along with allies have set up all sorts of sanctions towards Russia and are feeding Ukraine with intel and weapons to defend their country. You can call it a proxy war and it has components that go beyond the military, but it's a war nonetheless.

There's simply a lot at stake here, including the fate of the US dollar as a reserve and trade currency, alignment of powers in the indo-pacific region, the future of our biggest allies in Europe, the future of Taiwan, etc. Russia is also making a claim to be a superpower, which they no longer are. They're just a bigger North Korea these days, both on the political and economic realms. A clear message has to be sent that the days of 20+ years dictators is over, whether they have nuclear weapons or not.

The US itches for war. We'll get involved with all conflicts where we can gain some strategic or financial advantage, and it's never too late to claim patriotism and the salvation of democracy as a reason. The only difference is the cheering audience, based on the color of the flag flown by the current admin, blue or red.

I don't deny the US itches for war, nor claim that the US is a saint. There has been plenty of US wars without a clear goal or strategic objective (Afghanistan and Iraq come to mind in the recent past, and those were fought by both blue and red). But in this particular case, IMO you don't need to be blue or red to figure out who's the aggressor and what they're after. This is why the vast majority of both blue and red congressmen have so far supported this, it's really a no-brainer.

[Spurminator]

Poor hater and DMC.

[DMC]

That's better. The sarcasm gives an impression that you don't care. Too bad you didn't lead with that.

You have abandoned the argument so my work here is done.

How so?