47%.
She was 47%, he was 53 for the record.
It's merely one factor, not the factor.
So yes, her epic cheat was the ability to call an all in bet with a 53% chance of prevailing
47%.
She was 47%, he was 53 for the record.
It's merely one factor, not the factor.
good call
so in her epic cheat strategy, she called an all-in bet when she was the UNDERDOG and had a 47% chance of winning.
and as ya just said, 47% to 53% is very very significant tbh... its literally how casinos make millions of dollars on their game
Off millions of calls.
Not one huge one once in a while like this individual one.
Still not enough info on this one to definitely call this a cheat or just she got lucky.
Running it twice benefits her if she's the underdog. Especially at 53-47. She has a 53% chance of losing on one run. But running it twice, decreases her odds of losing (instead of splitting) to 28%.
You can't just look at the odds on one particular hand though in poker. You also have to look at the expected return. It often makes sense to make a bet or call even if you're the underdog as long as the expected return is positive.
In this hand, I don't think it applies. But to look at each hand in a vacuum isn't the right way to analyze things. Maybe you've got a 33% chance to win a hand but if you're getting 10 to 1 as your potential return on that hand, it's a good bet.
But that wasn't the case here.
'No Deception Detected': Robbi Jade Lew Passes Polygraph Test | PokerNews
* It should be noted that polygraph tests are not admissible in court — not that this cheating scandal was ever going to see a court of law — because they aren't always accurate. According to PsychologyToday.com, lie detector tests are only accurate an estimated 87% of the time.
Whoa hold the phone on s passing the polygraph. Arranged by her own PR firm and given in Vegas rather then near her home in L.A. Sounds more like a Brady or Lakers-Warriors playoff win.
Well known player at the table at the time had suggested a legit 3rd party Polygraph joint perform the test.
https://highstakesdb.com/news/high-s...o-live-scandal
let it go lol
the theory is that she cheated so she could call a massive hand where she was statistically more likely to lose? lmao
What is "it" that you are claiming be let go?
I don't know if she cheated or not.
But Ralphie, you keep referring to 47% when the point is it's possible she knew what the river card was. In which case it wouldn't matter if she only had a 1% chance if she knew the river card made her a winner.
One thing for sure, Hustler, like many casinos is full of sleaze balls.
The irony of having your own PR firm administer the polygraph, and 3 hours from your home. Real credible.
nice cleavage imo
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)