Reply With Quote
Why when pop said it he could have had 3 bottles of wine
On the face it seems odd. And this isn’t directed at you but got me thinking.
I think the plaintiff seems to be asserting that she warned people but wasn’t heard and kept meeting with him because that’s her job and due to fear of losing her job she had no other choice but to meet with him, or she had to quit. And then she was fired. That’s a bad look. If she alleged this, Spurs should have handled their future sessions differently, if it’s true she kept meeting him.
Despite Buzzbee being sleazy and barely knowing his client (“this morning she told me she has five degrees”) and not knowing about Vegas or Minnesota allegations, that doesn’t change much with his case other than to further bolster it as far as I can tell. I think that she hired this guy is a bad choice.
But…Big picture: something happened, she was let go first, the perpetrator was fired. Spurs are trying to avoid the situation throughout as far as I can tell. I still think the plaintiff is winning as far as optics.
Last edited by The Truth #6; 11-03-2022 at 02:32 PM.
Why when pop said it he could have had 3 bottles of wine
Fair point but it is somewhat unbelievable due to the fact that it’s literally her job to report mental health problems to upper management.
Her position is essentially in place to coup with these very things before they become a problem. Yet she continued to allow it to perpetuate when it’s her job to mitigate stuff like that.
I feel bad saying it but she has no business being a mental health expert while simultaneously allowing herself to be a victim in very situations she was hired to navigate.
Public setting implies there are witnesses. Just an observation.
Honestly Primo's best defense would be to say they was in. That would instantly make him the victim and make her a sex offender, since he's under 21
but hes not under 18
It would be smart. But I think age of consent in Texas is 17 or 18 not 21.
However it would make him a victim in that she was treating him.
yea I don't know about the laws in the US. You're an adult at 18 in Europe
tbh if false B Wrong gotta go too
Can't really trust Don Harris after he crapped on TSpence for reporting the Gasol signing tbh
Age of consent in Texas is 17. I just looked.
God damn 16 in New Jersey. The is wrong with them over there.
This was going on for months and only sought Buzbee when her contract was not extended sounds retaliatory. If Primo was indeed exposing himself to him (and maybe others), she as his psychologist cannot recommend further help for him? A psychiatric evaluation why he’s doing it?
This probably a nonfactor here, but there is some duty by mental health care professionals to report/warn if they believe their patient is about to commit a crime.
bruh of course she is a leftists metoo...........she is a scammer this was 3 years ago..........when u hire woke u go broke.........
I wish you people would just fall off the face of the earth. You make good honest conservatives look bad.
Primo's not looking too great early on from a public opinion perspective. His first comment on this topic was a post that he has suffered trauma and is dealing with mental health issues... not a confession of guilt exactly, but certainly some kind of acknowledgement that something unusual was going on and related to his being waived. And now his lawyer says nothing at all happened, no exposure whatsoever, and the psychologist is racist? I'm guessing Primo's current lawyer wasn't involved in that original statement that was released to ESPN.
I agree in general but this gets back to the ethical awkwardness I’ve been getting at: this isn’t a normal therapist/client relationship. It’s almost closer to her being a trainer, honestly. In a normal situation, she could just fire him as a client but she can’t do that here because the Spurs are the real client.
Due to the nature of her job, I don’t think she’s there to really heal him, but just use therapy techniques to improve his production on the court, basically.
Primo’s lawyer is a blithering moron who he should fire, and sue for legal malpractice, this afternoon. I mean, that lawyer needs to consult a lawyer. “Say as little as possible.”
That stupid idiot spewed his whole legal defense in public, for the other side to see.
Welp, better get used to the name "Austin" Spurs now...
Thanks Primo!
Or maybe take away the next draft pick from the Spurs as punishment?
Pay to make this go away, fire Wright and anyone else who helped him in trying to keep this quite then try and move on.
That should be Peter Holt's immediate to do list.
Get wright the fck outta here. Dude is in way over his head
Honestly if this means Brian Wrong leaving then that’s one good result.
So far all we have from Primo's camp is:
1 - he suffered trauma as a child, and is dealing with it
2 - she's a racist
Not exactly a strong start to their defense.
If she's got a paper trail on what/when she told Wright, that er needs to be unemployed by end of day.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
