Reply With Quote
Based on what? It’s a tossup.
Kari Lake's going to win, so you Democrats can chew on that one at least.
AZ gone on the electoral college map for Dems. At least they didn't get the equivalent of her in PA in Mastriano.
Based on what? It’s a tossup.
Did somebody check on ducks and snakeboy, tbh?
Why did you lose so badly in my home state of Michigan?
Lol. MM is a RINO
Ducks is too stupid to understand what happened. Snakeboy is a front runner only to be seen when red team wins decisively
I'm a DeSantis solidly MAGA conservative, definitely not pro-Romney or pro-McConnell....
...but the QAnon conspire and Trump's waffling (operation warp speed but the covid jab is the Dems' fault / hyperinflation is all the Dems' fault despite Trump pushing and fast tracking the spring 2020 stimulus which started it all)... and his sheer hypocrisy and stale, unfresh messaging these days just doesn't jive with me.
Yup, not pro-trump so definitely a RINO.
He supports Ron De-sanctimonious.
Not because Whitmer or whoever in the house won, but MI is a lost state on the electoral map likely forever for the GOP because Prop 2 in MI passed... by double digits no less. Easy to fix the votes there.
Best shot to 270 for the GOP in 2024 remains Kari Lake pulling off the win and fixing up the election integrity in AZ to match FL's system, and hopefully the same for Nevada. So the GOP (Desantis / whoever) would need to win AZ, likely GA, NV, and pull off Wisconsin which leans R but isn't as red as we all thought it was. Solid chance for New Mexico too based on demographic trends.
FYI: I do think DeSantis would make a state like Virginia very close, but it's very hard for the GOP to flip due to the enormous NOVA dem base.
PA is lost. MI is likely lost. Jocelyn Benson kept her job and Prop 2 passed. Way more important in the case of MI than, say, Whitmer.
Trump's a dumbass and an asshole.Yup, not pro-trump so definitely a RINO.
He supports Ron De-sanctimonious.
midterms have historically always been beatdowns for in bents unless you just allowed a massive terrorist attack to happen, in which case you get points for that for some reason
So when people can actually vote, you lose?
Good to know.
But Prop 2 isn't in effect.
Why did you lose basically everything in MI?
NY17 and NY19 were both lost by less than 3%
22 could be heading the same way
Last edited by spurraider21; 11-09-2022 at 01:39 PM.
this.. if Dems keep Senate control it would be a big win
again not sure how repugs ed that up tbh
Universal mail in absentees no excuse were already passed in a proposal in 2018. 2018 was also the year weed passed so stoners which are a blue-ish demographic moved there from IN/OH and to a lesser extent WI. Also Prop 3 was on the ballot which was abortion and as we've seen in almost all the states even red states like KY the abortion bans have largely failed
if SCOTUS didn't overturn Roe, Dixon wins, plain and simple. I'm guessing the gender gap in MI was massive.
Really the whole problem stems from Woodrow Wilson and passing the 19th. So much would get fixed by ripple effect if we just eighty-sixed the damn 19th.
So you lost on the issues. Wow.
it's Woodrow Wilson's fault
boebert still down with 90% of the votes in?
Federal income tax established
Got into WWI which led to Pearl Harbor and WWII - all because Wilson bought the Zimmerman hoax
The 19th Amendment
Woodrow Wilson's triple crown...
Yeah. Argument to be made he was worst POTUS ever. Lyndon Johnson and Jimmy Carter (despite only 1 term) and possibly Biden are all in that mix, too
What's your conspiracy theory here?
The US deep state made up the theory of the note written in Spanish to the Mexicans to invade the USA from the Kaiser in Germany in order to get our asses into WWI and enforce the big stick postulate and get the USA involved in europe and become a player in big oil in the middle east.
The USA stood to gain way too much money from it... too great of an opportunity for elites to pass up.
Who specifically was the US deep state in 1917?
Did it include Arthur Zimmerman?
The government itself... also some agencies like the FBI did exist back then, though not nearly as many and as powerful today, tbh
I'm asking specifically about Arthur Zimmerman because the note is named for him. He was the German Foreign Secretary in 1917.
Also Arthur Zimmerman admitted to composing and sending the telegram in a speech in the German Reichstag a month after the US received the note -- so again I ask: was Arthur Zimmerman part of the US deep state in 1917?
500k votes still to be counted in Maricopa
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
