Raymond Green is overrated AF

[spurraider21]

How do you know I have more posts than you in this thread? Did you count them?

I see you decided to play the lame game of deflecting but that's fine. Even if I do have strong anti-Draymond bias it still doesn't take way from the fact that you keep bumping this thread every time Draymond has a good game to get validation over your original argument about Draymond being a star. I don't even bother to bump this thread when Draymond has garbage games. I just don't give a to do it. Like I said before you keep this silly game going. You are not going to ever convince me with your arguments so don't bother wasting my time or others who disagree with you in this thread. We have already made up our minds about this scrub.

and im not deflecting. im just showing how dumb the arguments are. oh i have strong draymond bias because i keep bumping this thread. which is on its face a dumb argument and you immediately hate when i point out how often you post here too

[daslicer]

and im not deflecting. im just showing how dumb the arguments are. oh i have strong draymond bias because i keep bumping this thread. which is on its face a dumb argument and you immediately hate when i point out how often you post here too

Your arguments are pretty idiotic, and you were predictable like I expected you would be to put up the post count. You are trailing me only by 9 posts, so we are pretty much neck and neck in this thread. That's not saying much yourself either when trying to prove you are not biased. You are just almost equally pro-Draymond as I'm anti-Draymond. Also, it's not just you bumping this thread that shows you have Pro-Draymond bias it's the fact you have vehemently argued throughout this thread about Draymond being a star that shows your pro-biases for him.

[spurraider21]

Your arguments are pretty idiotic, and you were predictable like I expected you would be to put up the post count. You are trailing me only by 9 posts, so we are pretty much neck and neck in this thread. That's not saying much yourself either when trying to prove you are not biased. You are just almost equally pro-Draymond as I'm anti-Draymond. Also, it's not just you bumping this thread that shows you have Pro-Draymond bias it's the fact you have vehemently argued throughout this thread about Draymond being a star that shows your pro-biases for him.

the post count thing was your argument, not mine (as was the "hes only good because he gets away with fouls" argument)

yes, i think draymond is a very good defensive player. yes, im very argumentative, and i post a lot (have over 90k posts on this board). i reject that this means i have a strong pro-draymond bias, at least not to the degree where its skewing anything.

i think its very easy and convenient to just write off draymond's defensive ability as "he gets away with fouls" because its not quantifiable, unless you can show there is some systematic evidence of him getting away with stuff. because i turned around and mad the facetious point that duncan was only good at defense because he got away with fouls. i dont actually believe that. but im demonstrating how easy it is to just assert that as an argument because its not really falsifiable outside of occasional anecdotal videos

[benefactor]

How do you spend like 17 years here and not know something as basic as checking user post counts in a thread

[spurraider21]

for his career, Green averages 3.6 fouls per 36 in the regular season, and 3.9 in the playoffs

bowen averaged 2.9 and 3.1

duncan averaged 2.5 and 2.7

nephew is 2.0 and 2.3

[daslicer]

How do you spend like 17 years here and not know something as basic as checking user post counts in a thread

Because I never cared to do so. Never saw the point of seeing how many user post counts a person had in a thread.

[daslicer]

the post count thing was your argument, not mine (as was the "hes only good because he gets away with fouls" argument)

yes, i think draymond is a very good defensive player. yes, im very argumentative, and i post a lot (have over 90k posts on this board). i reject that this means i have a strong pro-draymond bias, at least not to the degree where its skewing anything.

i think its very easy and convenient to just write off draymond's defensive ability as "he gets away with fouls" because its not quantifiable, unless you can show there is some systematic evidence of him getting away with stuff. because i turned around and mad the facetious point that duncan was only good at defense because he got away with fouls. i dont actually believe that. but im demonstrating how easy it is to just assert that as an argument because its not really falsifiable outside of occasional anecdotal videos

You are never going to convince me that Draymond doesn't get away with fouling. We are just going to have to agree to disagree about this and I will leave it at that.

[spurraider21]

Because I never cared to do so. Never saw the point of seeing how many user post counts a person had in a thread.

except to tell them that their high post count is indicative of bias

when you have more

[spurraider21]

You are never going to convince me that Draymond doesn't get away with fouling. We are just going to have to agree to disagree about this and I will leave it at that.

then this is just your religion

[exstatic]

then this is just your religion

As Draymond worship is yours...

[MultiTroll]

for his career, Green averages 3.6 fouls per 36 in the regular season, and 3.9 in the playoffs

And in the real world actually commits 9.2 and 10.1

[MultiTroll]

D'Aron Fox out.
Does anyone know if the play that injured him has been posted?
An Apemond special?

[spurraider21]

As Draymond worship is yours...

thinking a player is good is worship

[daslicer]

then this is just your religion

Just like being pro-Draymond is your religion. GTFO with your nonsense.

[daslicer]

except to tell them that their high post count is indicative of bias

when you have more

Yes that means a lot coming from a guy who is third in the thread in posts. Like I said before you are not going to convince me with your argument, and neither am I going to convince you. Let's leave it that.

[spurraider21]

Yes that means a lot coming from a guy who is third in the thread in posts. Like I said before you are not going to convince me with your argument, and neither am I going to convince you. Let's leave it that.

i mean, i could be convinced but it would require evidence. the problem is there already is a lot of evidence throughout draymond's career that he's a great and versatile defender. but if somebody wanted to present evidence that throughout his career his prowess is a result of favorable officiating, then yes i'd like to see that evidence in order for me to find it compelling

[spurraider21]

Yes that means a lot coming from a guy who is third in the thread in posts. Like I said before you are not going to convince me with your argument, and neither am I going to convince you. Let's leave it that.

im not the one who made the claim that posting a lot is bad or indicative of bias. that was your claim

im laughing at your hypocrisy because you have more posts here than i do

[MultiTroll]

Appears it was Looney and not Apemond.
And on a Nothing Burger after the whistle play.

[daslicer]

im not the one who made the claim that posting a lot is bad or indicative of bias. that was your claim

im laughing at your hypocrisy because you have more posts here than i do

Says the guy who is in third place for posts in this thread. It's obvious you have a very Pro-Draymond bias.

[spurraider21]

im not the one who made the claim that posting a lot is bad or indicative of bias. that was your claim

im laughing at your hypocrisy because you have more posts here than i do

Says the guy who is in third place for posts in this thread. It's obvious you have a very Pro-Draymond bias.

thanks for proving my point

[daslicer]

thanks for proving my point

Draymond slurper.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

thinking a player is good is worship

No but reflexive and mindless defense certainly is.

[spurraider21]

No but reflexive and mindless defense certainly is.

Mindless?

[Ice009]

How do you spend like 17 years here and not know something as basic as checking user post counts in a thread

I didn't even know you could search for that. How do you search for who posted most in a thread?

[MultiTroll]

Moar Draymond

NBA Admits Massive Blown Call in Warriors vs. Kings Game 4 (msn.com)