Sidney Powell's evidence

[Thread]

Oh I agree with that...I was working from the angle that he won't while being a presidential candidate. If that wasn't a thing I think he most definitely would. In the end Trump is only about saving his own ass. When he leaves politics he will still grift people for money via his MAGA fame but that won't matter nearly as much as keeping himself intact as a franchise.

You want to see him crawl. Uh, uh. Nope, bene. You tried to blow him up. You tried to cut his head off. You tried to shoot him to death multiple times. & now you're subjecting him to the agony of crucifixion.

You s, you dirty rotten s.

He's livin' still.

[spurraider21]

Feds must give transactional immunity occasionally considering they have the ability to give witnesses new iden ies and put them in witness protection.

people in witsec usually still serve prison sentences. fed prisons have separate areas away from gen pop that is used for people under particular danger, including witsec inmates

their family may meanwhile be relocated and they connect them after sentence is up

witsec is voluntary on behalf of the witness. basically they agree to the plea deal including a reduced sentence (as we've seen, sometimes that means no prison). the plea deal cannot include any promises of witsec unelss separately authorized by the witsec program. when witsec determines this case of worthy of protection, the witness decides if he wants to go through that or not. if they accept, then the protection starts basically immediately including thru the prison sentence

[Thread]

people in witsec usually still serve prison sentences. fed prisons have separate areas away from gen pop that is used for people under particular danger, including witsec inmates

their family may meanwhile be relocated and they connect them after sentence is up

witsec is voluntary on behalf of the witness. basically they agree to the plea deal including a reduced sentence (as we've seen, sometimes that means no prison). the plea deal cannot include any promises of witsec unelss separately authorized by the witsec program. when witsec determines this case of worthy of protection, the witness decides if he wants to go through that or not. if they accept, then the protection starts basically immediately including thru the prison sentence

21, sweetheart, puddin'head, that ain't Trump. They'll be nary deal. Nary You're gonna have to put him in a prison cell in the uniform of that prison and in front of the world.

C'mon, 21, chop/chop.

[RandomGuy]

Trump will never, ever take a plea deal, even if it gets him off easy. How he looks to his base is way too important to him.

He is a coward. My guess is that he will take the deal if it benefits him, and will spin it on the backside, as he always does.

[Thread]

He is a coward. My guess is that he will take the deal if it benefits him, and will spin it on the backside, as he always does.

RG, sweetheart, puddin'head, that ain't Trump. They'll be nary deal. Nary You're gonna have to put him in a prison cell in the uniform of that prison and in front of the world.

C'mon, RG, chop/chop.

[Ef-man]

And the final nail in the coffin. Out with a whimper.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to revisit sanctions levied against two pro-Trump attorneys who filed frivolous lawsuits challenging the outcome of the 2020 election in Michigan.

Sidney Powell and Lin Wood filed separate appeals asking the justices to review sanctions imposed by a US district court in 2021. Though their cases involved several technical arguments, both claimed sanctions would make it less likely for lawyers to take “unpopular” cases to court.

The Supreme Court denied both appeals without offering any comment on the case.

[Thread]

And the final nail in the coffin. Out with a whimper.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to revisit sanctions levied against two pro-Trump attorneys who filed frivolous lawsuits challenging the outcome of the 2020 election in Michigan.

Sidney Powell and Lin Wood filed separate appeals asking the justices to review sanctions imposed by a US district court in 2021. Though their cases involved several technical arguments, both claimed sanctions would make it less likely for lawyers to take “unpopular” cases to court.

The Supreme Court denied both appeals without offering any comment on the case.

That's what happens when you make President by storming the gate.

tee, hee.

[Ef-man]

And the final nail in the coffin. Out with a whimper.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to revisit sanctions levied against two pro-Trump attorneys who filed frivolous lawsuits challenging the outcome of the 2020 election in Michigan.

Sidney Powell and Lin Wood filed separate appeals asking the justices to review sanctions imposed by a US district court in 2021. Though their cases involved several technical arguments, both claimed sanctions would make it less likely for lawyers to take “unpopular” cases to court.

The Supreme Court denied both appeals without offering any comment on the case.

A two-fer castration, a buy one get one free deal from the SC, nice.

A kraken and a super-lawyer belonging to Yam s!

[Thread]

A two-fer castration, a buy one get one free deal from the SC, nice.

A kraken and a super-lawyer belonging to Yam s!

That's what happens when you make President by storming the gate.

tee, hee.

[Ef-man]

[spurraider21]

requested default judgment against herself

translation here is that kari lake is effectively capitulating that she is indeed liable for defamation. is seeking a jury trial just as it relates to the damages

[scott]

requested default judgment against herself

translation here is that kari lake is effectively capitulating that she is indeed liable for defamation. is seeking a jury trial just as it relates to the damages

Can't afford the legal bills and the damages.

[Winehole23]

Powell, an attorney who has filed numerous lawsuits in a failed bid to overturn former President Donald Trump's 2020 election loss, made the comments during an appearance on the conservative Stew Peters Show on Friday.

She said that as a pro-Trump mob stormed the Capitol that day, her team was seeking an emergency injunction to prevent the certification of Biden's win.


"We were filing a 12th Amendment cons utional challenge to the process that the Congress was about to use under the Electoral Act provisions that simply don't jive with the 12th Amendment to the United States Cons ution," she said. "And Justice Alito was our circuit justice for that."



She added: "Louie Gohmert was the plaintiff in our lawsuit, and we were suing the vice president to follow the 12th Amendment as opposed to the Electoral College Act."

Powell claimed that when Pelosi learned of the lawsuit, she hurriedly reconvened Congress to certify Biden's victory shortly after the attack on the Capitol.


"She got notice when we made our filing because she wanted to file an amicus brief," Powell said. "And everything broke loose and she really had to speed up reconvening Congress to get the vote going before Justice Alito might have issued an injunction to stop it all, which is what should have happened."

https://www.newsweek.com/sidney-powe...6-mess-1632896

[Thread]

https://www.newsweek.com/sidney-powe...6-mess-1632896

Good. Whatever it takes.