I like and generally agree with many of your posts man, but come on now we're discussing spurs draft prospects, not destabilizing society here, I think 'scary thinking' might be overselling it. Ariel brought up a legitimate question, it's ok for them to have questions when Reed clearly gamed his combine measurements. If this isn't the place for out of the box thinking, where is? I still remember when I came up with "better brother theory" for Cody williams.
I think that the counter to Ariel's question though is that (I think) advanced stats such as BPM/BPR are calculated based on how much a team wins while said player is on the floor in addition to box score metrics, and Reed's statistical impact in these metrics were dominant independent of what teammates he shared the floor with. So while it's possible to game your percentages by taking more selective shots, if it's really causing your team to lose more, your +/- is probably going to go down and your BPM/BPR is not going to be affected that much. Could be wrong, it's a legitimate point.