If you want the coaches to urge Wemby to play the traditional post, closer to the basket, you won't like Pop's statement after last night's Utah game:
"He's more of a perimeter player than he is a post player, and we want him to be able to do everything. Isolate, shoot, do the whole deal. We just can't do it all at once. It just depends on the situation and what's going on." - Coach Popovich
If Wemby's a perimeter player much of the time, it's going to hard for him to anchor a championship-level team.
If he's not consistently down low, it will be harder for him to be the focus of the offense, to make his teammates better, to use his unicorn abilities, his length, at point blank range.
If he's just another three point shooter, he's doing the defense a favor, they can relax and wait for rebounds -- Wemby won't be there to rebound and put back. No one can block his shot so the defender can preserve his energy and dare him, gentleman's agreement.
An inside-out offense is a more consistent offense. Wemby on the perimeter will require the Spurs to acquire more offensive stars to create their own shots. It will be more ad hoc with players unsure what to do or, even worse, standing around. It will largely neutralize Wemby's value (except as a defensive force).
The ball dies when Wemby dominates it outside. The offense stops and loses structure. Nothing consistent or duplicable happens to riff off of as the game moves forward. It's like the first unstructured posession over and over, basically anarchy.
When Pop said last year that he wanted to watch Wemby and "see what they had" rather than force a structure on him, I thought that was a great idea. I didn't realize that it might be the whole plan this year and perhaps, even worse, going forward.
Maybe Wemby will never be able to get down low and be the center of the offense, but at least they should try before the status quo becomes the default norm.