Eh, I just got my way, Blake.
That's it & that's all.
them all
got you down as a "yes" for denaturalizing US citizens based on what they say
I'm also down for anyone claiming to be a socialist or commie. They're trash and should be treated as so. Jot that down too bro!
https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/138-a...uctive-custodyIt’s hard to keep up with the flood of court-related news stories these days. But I wanted to write this morning to flag a remarkable (and time-sensitive) ruling yesterday by Judge Paula Xinis (a federal judge in the District of Maryland), ordering the U.S. government to bring back to the United States Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia—a Salvadoran national whom the Trump administration wrongly removed from the United States (due to what it claims was an “administrative error”) on March 15, and who has been detained at the notorious “CECOT” mega-jail in Tecoluca, El Salvador ever since. Judge Xinis ordered the government to effectuate Abrego Garcia’s return to the United States by 11:59 p.m. this Monday, April 7. The government has already appealed her ruling to the Fourth Circuit.
When asked about Judge Xinis’s ruling on Friday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded that “We suggest the Judge contact [Salvadoran] President Bukele because we are unaware of the judge having jurisdiction or authority over the country of El Salvador.” Leaving aside the Trump administration’s refusal to take any responsibility for the consequences of its own error, that obnoxious retort is true so far as it goes. The problem is that it just doesn’t go very far. Federal courts may not have the power to compel the release of an individual from a foreign prison, but they unquestionably have the power to order the U.S. government to take whatever steps it can to effectuate the same result. And it seemed worth writing a (short) post explaining why.
No freedom of speech, but coercive government viewpoint discrimination in line with your personal beliefsI'm also down for anyone claiming to be a socialist or commie. They're trash and should be treated as so. Jot that down too bro!
Got it!
Cope and seethe!
If Trumplandia could negotiate Noem's photo op at the Salvadoran gulag, it can negotiate the release of the person it wrongly sent there
Every first-year Civil Procedure student who suffers through “personal jurisdiction” learns that courts can use their power over defendants who are in their jurisdiction to regulate conduct that occurs elsewhere. And so the question in the Abrego Garcia case is not whether Judge Xinis can order President Bukele to do anything (she can’t); it’s whether and to what extent Secretary Noem, who certainly is subject to Judge Xinis’s jurisdiction, can take steps to effectuate Abrego Garcia’s return. If Noem swears under oath that she’s powerless, that would be one thing. But (1) that would be more than a little difficult to believe; and (2) that hasn’t happened yet.
This issue has come up before in … less charged … removal proceedings. In a case my good friend and Jenner & Block (yay Jenner!) partner Lindsay Harrison had brought to the Supreme Court in 2009,2 the Solicitor General had represented that:
By policy and practice, the government accords aliens who were removed pending judicial review but then prevailed before the courts effective relief by, inter alia, facilitating the aliens' return to the United States by parole under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(5) if necessary, and according them the status they had at the time of removal.
It turns out that the government … overstated things. As then-Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben clarified in a 2012 letter, “without providing additional detail about the government’s approach to effectuating return and restoring status, the statement that relief was accorded ‘[b]y policy and practice’ suggested a more formal and structured process than existed at the time.” But as the Dreeben letter noted, the government responded by creating a more formal and structured process—as reflected in a 2012 directive adopted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director John Morton (that, near as I can tell, is still on the books). In other words, the government already has a procedure in place for taking steps to return at least some individuals who have been wrongly removed—or even those who haven’t, but whose presence in the United States is necessary to fully adjudicate any pending legal challenges they may have to their removal.
Thus, not only do federal courts have the formal authority to order federal respondents to take steps to effectuate the return of individuals who have been wrongly removed from the United States, but the federal government has a policy respecting how it can and should do so in at least some cases. I don’t mean to overstate things; it’s at least possible that there’s nothing the federal government can do at this point to get Abrego Garcia back. But again, given the cir stances of this case, that’s difficult to believe—at least where things stand today.
And at a more fundamental level, it would be rather stunning if the law were otherwise. A world in which federal courts lacked the power to order the government to take every possible step to bring back to the United States individuals like Abrego Garcia is a world in which the government could send any of us to a Salvadoran prison without due process, claim that the misstep was a result of “administrative error,” and thereby wash its hands of any responsibility for what happens next. Rather than providing fodder for snarky comments from the White House Press Secretary, that possibility should terrify all of us—and, hopefully, the Fourth Circuit and the Supreme Court as well—and push courts to provide whatever relief is possible under the cir stances, as Judge Xinis attempted to in yesterday’s ruling.
Awesome story bro! I don't think you get it yet, leftism is a plague and no one's putting up with yalls bellyache over illegals, sob stories, incestuous jihadis, et al.
Cry me a river bro!
I was just paraphrasing you
I don't see any denials in your reply to me
Paraphrase this; cope and seethe harder!
thanks for underscoring my emphasis
yet again
Btw WH I don't remember you crying this hard over all them back channels the dip biden admin had with most social networks as freedom of speech was only free if you kissed the boot. Where were you then?
Where were you when plenty of people were denied their rights because of the InSuRrEcTiOn?
They had due process under the laws of the United States of America.
And asking a company to look at content telling people to inject bleach or something is good.
GD rights, kori.
kori
...that was BEFORE he made President AGAIN.
(the idea that due process afforded J6 defendants in open court proceedings somehow resembles black bag renditions to a Salvadoran gulag -- stains credibility)
...Whatever it takes.
rounding up foreign students en masse at this point, really arbitrary and shameful
https://www.bridgemi.com/talent-educ...l-students-cmuWithout notice or explanation, the Trump administration has stripped several current and former Central Michigan University international students of their right to be in the US, university officials announced Friday.
CMU staff discovered the situation while doing routine checks of the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System, a Department of Homeland Security web portal containing information about international students.
Calling the situation "alarming," university spokesperson Ari Harris said CMU officials are scrambling to notify affected students, who now seem to have two options: Leave the country or reapply for permission to stay and hope the application is approved.
Harris said “several” students and former students were affected, but did not know an exact number.
“These are members of our community that we have recruited to come here,” Harris said, adding that DHS officials have offered no explanation of why they revoked the students’ immigration records.
Gonna be a wild time when other countries start reciprocating by revoking American visas and deporting Americans because of the policies of this administration.
to meet quotas, looks like ICE is detaining anyone they possibly can, for any reason at all
this case will be in the history books
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
