Reply With Quote
Hey, let's trade for Luka. Just don't give up any good players or trade assets. And the team says they won't trade him, but go get him anyway. Who cares about little things like reality?
Your GM skills rival your proofreading ability.
Milwaukee states he's not going anywhere, but rumors swirl about his trade availability, with the Nets being potential suitors.
If the Spurs can get him, THEY GOTTA PULL THE TRIGGER ON THIS!
Only Wemby, Castle.and Fox are untouchables.
Last edited by bigzak25; 2 Weeks Ago at 12:06 PM.
Hey, let's trade for Luka. Just don't give up any good players or trade assets. And the team says they won't trade him, but go get him anyway. Who cares about little things like reality?
Your GM skills rival your proofreading ability.
Hey bro, no offense, but what do you know? Your view is obstructed.
Longshot, yes of course. But impossible? Nope. It could happen and be a win for all teams, but especially the Spurs as it would catapult us to next level instantaneously of course.
Just Google Giannis trade rumors. Stranger things have happened.
Have you found that laptop yet,big snack?
I’d offer Keldon and pick 14 in this years draft (lottery protected)
Rockets nets and OKC can give up better assets for Giannis. Unless Giannis forces his way specifically to the spurs ala fox, I don’t see it.
No way Castle is not part of a Giannis trade. They would want every asset for him. He would be awesome, but he is crossing the 30 year old threshold.
The Spurs don't have enough to give up for him. Like Ambchang said, unless he demands to come to SA, and SA only, no chance of getting him without giving up Castle and a horde of draft picks which I don't think I'd want to deplete all the draft assets. Not sure about what other people here think about giving up tons of draft picks for him.
Not happening. Spurs have repeatedly stated they're going to rebuild this team the right way through the draft. And we don't have a farm to sell for Giannis anyways. Even a package centered around Castle + Vassell + a plethora of draft capital wouldn't be enough. So the point is moot.
Lmao Ex...you have a great memory Sir! That laptop was stolen from me during a manic episode I had in Ireland. They used it as an excuse to let me go, but it's all good, I survived. Got naked in the streets of Ireland, sure, but I survived. Ha.
WTF? Sounds like a crazy story. Care to tell us about it?
I'm sure it would take more than that.
But this is Giannis. With Wemby, Castle, and Fox.
That's a Championship core.
The Spurs could build around that core in a couple of seasons and we're ready to rock.
Man, I have lots of crazy stories that are all too real. Bipolar I is no joke. And the power of God and Jesus is Amazing. But not in this forum. Maybe in the Club.
Giannis is loyal. That's why he'd make a great Spur.
We'd have to make it worth Milwaukee's while. Thus, the trade the farm le. Whatever it takes. Multiple number 1s. Soshan. Vassell. We go all in.
Castle is off the table. We don't do the trade if they want Castle.
But if there is any possible way, we gotta do it.
Talking multiple Championships here. That's worth all our draft capital for the next 5 years even. But I'd want to keep some of our picks sure.
Then there's no point discussing it because there's no world where they would trade him here with Castle being part of the deal.
So you come to a Spurs discussion forum and you don't want to discuss anything? Okay...suit yourself.
I did discuss it. I discussed it by saying your proposition was a non starter that wasn't worthy of any more consideration... I'm sorry you didn't like hearing that.
You don't have to be sorry. I'm fine with hearing your opinion.
I don't see Giannis as a Spur, nor, as a guy who will lead another team to a le in his 30's. I say, go fish.
Hey, bro, no offense, but in the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
In a year where Luka was traded, I can honestly say that stranger things have NOT happened.
Not a long shot. Impossible. Milwaukee will not trade Giannis with no talent coming back.
Kudos for your improved attention to grammar and punctuation.
If I was going to sarcastically suggest that you can't make a farcical lowball offer for a superstar and expect to get away with holding trade assets back, I would quite simply not use Luka Doncic as my example.
I think you might be manic again
It was intentional. Ridiculous as that trade was, they got Anthony Davis in return. He's injury prone but he's a legitimate asset.
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (2 members and 8 guests)
Posting Permissions
