slipping
![]()
mass deportation efforts continue to hit brown Americans
pretty soon everyone will have to carry proof of citizenship to protect ourselves from Trump's deportation goons
incipient police state, tbh
Oh it unfolded alright
The Tennessee Star on Tuesday obtained the final deportation order issued by former U.S. Immigration Judge David M. Jones in 2019, which also granted “withholding of removal” relief, showing the judge appeared to prohibit immigration authorities from deporting Kilmar Abrego Garcia to Guatemala, not to El Salvador, where he was born and remains a citizen.
Jones ultimately ruled against Abrego Garcia’s asylum claim, as it was filed beyond the deadline created under federal law, as well as the Salvadoran’s CAT claim. However, Jones granted Abrego Garcia’s request for a “withholding of removal” order based on his claim that gangs threatened his family in El Salvador and Guatemala:
"The Respondent’s application for asylum is time-barred without exception. However, he has established past persecution based on a protected ground, and the presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution. DHS has not shown there are changed cir stances in Guatemala that would result in the Respondent’s life not being threatened, or that internal relocation is possible and reasonable under the cir stances. Therefore, the Respondent’s application for withholding under the Act is granted. Finally, his CAT claim fails because he has not shown that he would suffer torture.”
https://tennesseestar.com/news/immig...=6808e5297c532
How much of your life did you waste here spamming articles hoping you'd get your MS13 gang buddy back to Maryland?![]()
"ah , it said Guatemala?"
![]()
Still not seeing the due process for forever gulag.
Is there do entation for that?
T S A
jfc
out and out goonery
informing people of their rights isn't obstruction
https://radleybalko.substack.com/p/t...e-to-be-decentLast month, Clay Jackson was at the gas station just up the street from his home in a Dallas suburb when one of the attendants asked if he might provide some legal advice to an immigrant family.“There’s a guy in there who just shoots the with you when you come in to pay,” Jackson says. “He’d heard that I had previously given some pro bono legal help to a family who owned a barbecue restaurant. He said there was family in the area where the dad had been caught up in one of the ICE workplace raids and they’re really freaking out. The parents were undo ented, while one of the kids is DACA and the other is a U.S. citizen.”
The man asked Jackson if he would be willing to “just talk to them and make sure they know their rights and where they can some help. I said absolutely. I’m not an immigration lawyer, but they were scared to reach out to anyone, so I said I’d go there and try to just give them the basics.”
Later that afternoon, March 4, Jackson visited the family in their home. “It was a little difficult to communicate because everything had to be translated through the 10-year-old kid.” He met with them for less than an hour and told them their rights if they’re detained by ICE. “I said I’d help find them pro bono counsel who specialized in immigration.”
“A couple days later, on March 6, I was working from home at around 11:30 when I got a notice that my VPN had gone down,” he says. “I didn’t think much about it. It can cut out from time to time. About 10 minutes later, I got a knock at the door.”
Two men were outside Jackson’s door, dressed in slacks and polos. They were not wearing badges.
“I first thought they were going to try to sell me something. But as soon as I opened the door they said, ‘Are you Clayton Jackson?’ I think I shook my head or said ‘yeah,’ and then I heard, ‘We have information that you are obstructing an ongoing immigration investigation.’”
Jackson says alarms went off in his head. “My first instinct was to want to know what this was about. That it must be a misunderstanding. So I started to tell them about how I’ve been involved in some pro bono work. Then this voice in my head kicked in and just said, you need to shut the up — don’t say anything.”
The officers never identified themselves. They did ask if they could come inside.
“I said absolutely not,” Jackson says. “I asked for their names and badge numbers. They said they didn’t have to provide that information at this time. So I told them I’d be calling my lawyer and I shut the door behind me.”
Jackson says his mind started racing. “I needed to know who they were, what agency they were with. Then I remembered that I have the Ring camera. Maybe I could watch the video of the incident and figure out who they were from that.”
There was no video. “That’s when I learned why my VPN had gone down. It wasn’t the VPN. Someone had shut off my Wifi.”
About 15 minutes after the interaction at his front door, Jackson’s Wifi was up and running again.
“I have a buddy who’s former federal law enforcement and is now a lawyer. So I called him and asked him if federal agencies have the technological capability to shut someone’s Wifi down without them knowing, and if that’s something they do. And he said ‘ yes.’ He said they do it all the time when they want to have an informal interview with somebody and don’t want to be recorded.”
People I spoke to who have expertise in these matters said (a) it would not be difficult to shut down someone’s Wifi, and (b) doing so without a court order would be illegal.
This attorney mentioned that he’d recently had some work done on his home, and had gotten to know one of the contractors. The contractor was undo ented, and feared he may be deported. In the 20-some years he’d been in the U.S., this contractor had done well for himself — he owned his contracting business, his home, and some property. He asked if the attorney could help him transfer the business and le to his home and property to his son, who is a U.S. citizen. The attorney and his wife — who is also a lawyer — agreed to help.
“As my wife and I started filling out the paperwork, we realized that we might be doing this sort of work for other people over the next few years, so she suggested we bring up one of the old desktops from the basement, so whatever immigration work we were doing would be on a separate computer.”
The attorney’s college-aged son had taken an interest in all of this.
“My son asked if what we were doing was illegal. I told him it was all perfectly legal. Then he asked me a question I really couldn’t answer: Why did we feel like we had to take these steps to hide legal work that was perfectly legal? And all I could think to say was that this is the kind of country we live in now.”
FOX tips Trump...
Top Trump officials file charges against illegal immigrant after Fox News exposes early release plans
'My office has filed a felony immigration charge against this defendant' a key California prosecutor said
By Cameron Arcand , Bill Melugin Fox News
Published April 23, 2025 1:46pm EDT
Winehole dropping in for a couple obligatory spam posts while ignoring that the withholding order for his MS13 BFF Abrego was actually for Guatemala and not El Salvador![]()
This is the new eating cats for TSA.
Although he has sure shut the up about Pete Hegseth for some reason.
Deported alleged MS-13 gangbanger Kilmar Abrego Garcia was driving convicted smuggler’s car during Tennessee traffic stop
https://nypost.com/2025/04/23/us-new...-traffic-stop/
Maryland father
Ackchyually Guatemala
![]()
Are su ions enough to disappear a person forever?
TSA wanted to lock Democrats up for something called unlawful exoneration?
GREAT OPTICS, GREAT TIMING
THIS MAKES US LOOK BOLD AND RESOLUTE
With the Trump administration having terminated multiple contracts providing lawyers to unaccompanied migrant children, we're back to the bad old days of toddlers representing themselves against deportation.![]()
LOOK AT THE MS-13 TERRORIST
They're illegal...they're going outPERIOD
multi-tiered justice means at bottom that's there's always the option of stripping US citizens of civil rights and accessibility to law by calling them terrorists
If you're in here illegally, you are going outPERIOD
"Caput gerat lupinum" is the badge of the outlaw
outlawry in the 21st Century is basically a reversion to Anglo-Saxon law -- a thousand-year regression, legally speaking
https://thelawdictionary.org/wolfs-head/
there's no good government rationale for DHS doxxing Kilmar Abrego's wife
that's pure official oppression
The wife of a wrongly deported Salvadoran father living in Maryland was moved to a safe house after Donald Trump’s administration posted a court do ent that included her address on social media.https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b2738214.html“I don’t feel safe when the government posts my address, the house where my family lives, for everyone to see, especially when this case has gone viral and people have all sorts of opinions,” she told The Washington Post. “So, this is definitely a bit terrifying. I’m scared for my kids.”
Lol same old dribble your fear mongering MSM has been pushing. Cry harder! Lie harder too!
Trumpy legal shenanigans do not seem to be going over well with the judges, on the whole
apparently DOD helped to evade the court order
https://justsecurity.substack.com/p/...to-dod-custodyOn March 28, the court ordered the defendants in the case – the Department of Homeland Security including ICE and the Department of Justice – not to deport any individual with a final removal order “UNLESS and UNTIL Defendants provide that individual, and their respective immigration counsel, if any, with written notice of the third country to where they may be removed, and UNTIL Defendants provide a meaningful opportunity for that individual to submit an application for CAT [Convention Against Torture] protection to the immigration court” (capitalization emphasis in original).
The government now says it did remove these individuals to El Salvador after the court’s order! The government’s excuse: The removal to El Salvador was carried out by the Department of Defense (DOD) rather than DHS/ICE, and the former is not a named defendant in the case. An example from the government’s Wednesday night filing:
The flaw in this attempted excuse is obvious. What that statement leaves out is which agency had custody of the detainees after the court’s order.
And what the accompanying ICE official’s affidavit makes clear is that the DHS was directly involved in their removal. That’s because DHS had custody of several of the individuals after the court’s order, and then transferred them to DOD after the court’s order. Indeed, DHS apparently transferred some individuals to the DOD base in Guantanamo. The base served as a very temporary holding place until their transportation by DOD to El Salvador a few days later. Here’s an example from the affidavit:
This switch from one department (a named defendant) to the other is not cunning. It appears to be a violation of the court’s order in spirit and in law.
What a ing pussy he’s still doing it![]()
So lock a person away forever based on your vibes?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)