Reply With Quote
Government jobs good.
We understand.
Poor fella just can't get anything to go his way
He rushed to ST to post the numbers from the absolutely useless ADP report claiming 33,000 private sector jobs lost when in reality private sector gained 74,000. Poor fella thought he finally got one.
Government jobs good.
We understand.
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/04/indi...es-market.htmlJane Street barred from Indian markets as regulator freezes $566 million over Nifty 50 manipulation claims
...
Jane Street allegedly used various strategies to artificially influence India’s benchmark Nifty 50 index — which tracks the country’s top 50 companies — and profit from significantly larger positions in index options.
According to SEBI’s 105-page interim order, Jane Street would aggressively buy large amounts of stocks and futures that are part of the BANKNIFTY index, which tracks the performance of India’s banking sector, early in the trading day. The quan ative trading firm would then place large bets that the index would decline later in the day.
Jane Street would then sell off the positions it had bought earlier, dragging the index lower and making their earlier bets in the options market far more profitable.
While Jane Street would incur some losses, SEBI contended that it was part of a “deliberate strategy to manipulate indices to the advantage of the trading and positions,” and the losses were offset by the firm’s much larger and profitable options trade.
While these actions were not a breach of any regulation, SEBI said that the “intensity and sheer scale” of their intervention, and the rapid reversal of their trades “without any plausible economic rationale, other than the concurrent activity in and impact on their positions in the BANKNIFTY index options markets,” was manipulative.
SEBI noted that repeated instances of manipulative trading continued on the broader Nifty50 benchmark even after an “explicit advisory” was issued to the firm in February 2025 by the National Stock Exchange of India.
...
American businesses increasing their business is great unless it comes at the cost of the American consumer. Which it will. You're a closet Trump , I see why you don't care about consumers.
Mish is a Trumper
https://mishtalk.com/economics/kiss-...e-cut-in-july/July 3, 2025: The Rise in Continued Unemployment Claims Shows Difficulty in Finding a Job
If you lose a job, it is increasingly difficult to find one.The jobs picture is quite muddled. But claims data provides the best take.
Unlike small BLS samples with meager response rates of 42 percent on top of that, people file claims quickly when they lose a job. And continued claims are soaring
It's time for a new political party. We all know this.
what will this new political party stand for? Abortion...pro life? open borders?....illegals kicked out? gays? non gays? this party will never take off. Its democrats vs republicans. All the rest like the green party is just fodder for the undecided.
The Council of Economic Advisers (CEA), after decomposing the Personal Consumption Expenditure Price
Index into imported and domestic components, found that the prices of imported goods have not only
fallen this year, but also declined faster than overall goods prices since February. These findings contradict
claims that tariffs or tariff-fears would lead to an acceleration of inflation.
More commonly referred to as PCE or PCEPI, the Personal Consumption Expenditure Price Index is an
inflation gauge watched closely by policymakers and financial markets. Overall goods prices in the PCE
index have increased by 0.4 percent from December 2024 through May 2025, which corresponds to a 1
percent annualized rate. Meanwhile, the imported component of PCE goods prices fell by 0.1 percent from
December 2024 through May 2025. CEA’s directional findings using this method of analyzing the PCE are
consistent across core goods (excluding food and energy), durables (which last for at least three years),
and nondurables. The import contribution to inflation includes both the direct impact of imported final
goods for consumption and indirect effects of imported intermediate inputs.
Similar analysis for the widely used Consumer Price Index (CPI) shows that imported goods have deflated
0.8 percent while overall goods prices have remained constant. There are a number of differences between
PCE and CPI inflation, including scope of products included and weighting methodologies, so finding a
similar pattern for CPI highlights the robustness of the results.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-conten...uced-Goods.pdf
Lol you believe the white house.The Council of Economic Advisers (CEA), after decomposing the Personal Consumption Expenditure Price
Index into imported and domestic components, found that the prices of imported goods have not only
fallen this year, but also declined faster than overall goods prices since February. These findings contradict
claims that tariffs or tariff-fears would lead to an acceleration of inflation.
More commonly referred to as PCE or PCEPI, the Personal Consumption Expenditure Price Index is an
inflation gauge watched closely by policymakers and financial markets. Overall goods prices in the PCE
index have increased by 0.4 percent from December 2024 through May 2025, which corresponds to a 1
percent annualized rate. Meanwhile, the imported component of PCE goods prices fell by 0.1 percent from
December 2024 through May 2025. CEA’s directional findings using this method of analyzing the PCE are
consistent across core goods (excluding food and energy), durables (which last for at least three years),
and nondurables. The import contribution to inflation includes both the direct impact of imported final
goods for consumption and indirect effects of imported intermediate inputs.
Similar analysis for the widely used Consumer Price Index (CPI) shows that imported goods have deflated
0.8 percent while overall goods prices have remained constant. There are a number of differences between
PCE and CPI inflation, including scope of products included and weighting methodologies, so finding a
similar pattern for CPI highlights the robustness of the results.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-conten...uced-Goods.pdf
"Many economists and trade experts worry the damage from the trade war has not been canceled; it just hasn’t arrived yet. They fear that overdoing tariffs and prolonging the uncertainty will only make matters worse.
“No one should be lulled into complacency,” Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of center-right think tank American Action Forum, told CNN in a phone interview. “There is no way you can avoid these price pressures. The tariffs are real. It will show up. The only question is how fast and where. That story has yet to play out.”
https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/08/busin...inflation-jobs
Smh Trump s. RIF.
Jack and the Beanstalk Republicans have assimilated the fairytale and criticize reality for the difference
Oh a survey!
They believe in TACO.
Can you blame them?
You are so ing stupid
“The conventional story, which is dominant in central banks around the world, rests on two key premises. First, that inflation expectations… are an important determinant of realized inflation…. The second key premise is that central bank behavior and possibly central bank communications can influence inflation expectations and through them macroeconomic outcomes…. If inflation expectations are well-anchored in the sense that they don’t respond very much to short-term movements in realized inflation and other variables, then policymakers can respond more aggressively to recessionary demand shocks and less aggressively to inflationary supply shocks, leading to better dual mandate outcomes.”
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/w...o-they-matter/
TLDR
Still waiting for you to find a single economist warning of MASSIVE inflation
US Chamber of Commerce and the Consumer Technology Ass'n file amicus brief against Trump's tariffs
https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...3105.108.0.pdf
.
What's your point with this? In your own words if you have the ability.You are so ing stupid
“The conventional story, which is dominant in central banks around the world, rests on two key premises. First, that inflation expectations… are an important determinant of realized inflation…. The second key premise is that central bank behavior and possibly central bank communications can influence inflation expectations and through them macroeconomic outcomes…. If inflation expectations are well-anchored in the sense that they don’t respond very much to short-term movements in realized inflation and other variables, then policymakers can respond more aggressively to recessionary demand shocks and less aggressively to inflationary supply shocks, leading to better dual mandate outcomes.”
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/w...o-they-matter/
TLDR
MUH DICTIONARY INTERNET VICTORY!
Still waiting for you to find a single economist warning of MASSIVE inflation
You could have just read the link and not asked another idiotic question that makes you look even stupider, you idiot
Inflation expectations, the survey you laughed at, are extremely important to the Federal Reserve.
THE WORDS I USE ON A FORUM WHEN MAKING CLAIMS HAVE NO MEANING!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
