Reply With Quote
if you say X broke the law, but you can't say what law was broken
then you don't really know what you're talking about
We are absolutely disputing it, you whiny little .
You know you're wrong. You know you're not smart. You know you're ignorant.
All you have left is rage.
And drugs.
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 10-16-2025 at 02:32 PM.
if you say X broke the law, but you can't say what law was broken
then you don't really know what you're talking about
but
MAGA is all about creating a vibe and acting on it
so it makes sense that you say Dems are breaking the law without knowing what you're talking about
it's kind of like the brand new vogue of the US government calling the political opposition terrorists
Running the DOJ out of the White House now
https://www.democracydocket.com/news...cal-adversary/Elizabeth Yusi, a longtime federal prosecutor in the Eastern District of Virginia, was dismissed Friday evening, according to multiple people familiar with the matter, after she told colleagues she found “no probable cause” to indict James. Her deputy, Kristin G. Bird, was also fired
a Republican Senator doesn't have the gumption to call out Trump for violating the cons ution
Trump 2.0 is a crime spree
thehill.com/homenews/senate/5559673-republicans-concerned-trump-reprogramming/Traditionally, the White House needs to send a request to reprogram federal funding to Capitol Hill, and members of the Appropriations Committee need to approve it before an administration is able to shift funds away from the programs for which they were intended.
Republican appropriators say they are not aware of the White House sending a reprogramming request to Congress before Trump ordered Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to use “all available funds” to make sure that troops got their paychecks this week.
One Republican senator who requested anonymity to comment on Trump’s aggressive repurposing of federal funding said the administration didn’t explain its legal authority.
When Congress won't or can't appropriate money, it's contrary to the Anti-Deficiency Act for POTUS to solicit donations to fund his priorities
Other than that, Trump's vanity project for the people's house has strong symbolic value during a government shutdown
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...umps-ballroom/Trump has started demolishing the White House's East Wing facade to build his ballroom. The president had claimed construction of the $250 million building wouldn’t ‘interfere’ with the existing White House structure.
Another day, another lie revealed
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cons u...iations-clauseNo Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/21/u...tdown-pay.html
Last edited by Winehole23; 10-21-2025 at 07:14 PM.
nakedly uncons utional spending
wrecking public capacity related to cybersecurity -- what could go wrong?
https://www.cybersecuritydive.com/ne...tional/803433/
demanding to be paid for his crimes
https://democrats-judiciary.house.go...ent-demand.pdf
picking winners and losers based on political patronage
Trump's bid to pay the military with R&D funds and donations falls afoul of the Antideficiency Act, the Appropriations Clause and the "purpose statute" (31 U.S.C. § 1301) at a minimum
The president or private donors making themselves paymasters of the US military is a facial conflict of interest, and totally uncons utional
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article...y-the-militaryThe administration’s action to pay the military during the shutdown violates the Cons ution, the Antideficiency Act (which gives teeth to the Cons ution), and the “purpose” statute (31 U.S.C. § 1301), as well as appropriations law and authorization statutes.
Let’s start with the Cons ution. Article I, Section 9, Clause 7, is often known as the Appropriations Clause. It says:
No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.In plain terms, the federal government can’t spend money on something unless Congress has provided money for that specific purpose. The Antideficiency Act and the purpose statute are laws that enshrine this prohibition into the U.S. Code. Under the Antideficiency Act, the federal government can’t spend money without an appropriation enacted into law and an apportionment (explained below) of the appropriated funds by the president’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Under the purpose statute, it can’t spend the money it does have for any purpose not specifically allowed in the authorization law and the appropriation made for the budget account(s) that funds that authorized purpose.
When President Trump used money authorized only for the purpose of supporting R&D to instead pay the troops, he used existing money for a purpose not allowed by that appropriation. He also spent money to pay the troops when he didn’t have an appropriation usable for that purpose.
"accusation in a mirror"
blame the target for what you're already doing
Trump is taking care to break the law at every expedient juncture, daring the law to catch him
not just in one crime but myriad
democrat pussies crying as usual like blake and chump.
Does the law matter to you at all?
Yes or no.
do you support illegals?....yes or no.
You support felons. Not even a question.
And your party lost to him....you support a party that cant even beat a felon.....
Support?
No.
Does the law matter to you at all?
Yes or no.
dismantling public capacity is dismantling civilization
https://alaskapublic.org/news/alaska...arning-systemsThe National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is halting a contract that makes it possible for the federal agency to accurately monitor for potential tsunamis in Alaska – and quickly warn at-risk communities.
The Alaska Earthquake Center for decades has collected data from seismology stations across the state and directly fed the information to NOAA’s National Tsunami Center, in Palmer. If the data indicates an earthquake that could lead to a tsunami, the Tsunami Center sends out a warning message within minutes.
Or at least that’s how it worked historically, including on Thursday morning, when an earthquake struck between Seward and Homer.
But that’s about to change. In late September, the federal agency advised the Alaska Earthquake Center that it does not have funding available for that work
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
