Reply With Quote
Unless there is clear evidence (the kind that results in charges and enough to convict with in a court of law) that Trump did something illegal, then none of this will bring down Trump.
Yeah you also thought he wouldn't get convicted in any felony charges.
Then you voted for him any way. Re .
Unless there is clear evidence (the kind that results in charges and enough to convict with in a court of law) that Trump did something illegal, then none of this will bring down Trump.
the idea that only evidence to a legal certainty should bring down politicians is moral derangement, tbh
that's the criminal standard
the standard for public service should be much lower
Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/pol...#storylink=cpyThe latest Justice Department release of Jeffrey Epstein files sheds some light on the FBI’s quest in 2019 to charge additional suspects who may have helped the financier or participated in his sex trafficking crimes. The names of 10 potential co-conspirators, or suspects, that New York prosecutors intended to interview in 2019 was mentioned in the new do ents, released Tuesday.
Three of those suspects were: Epstein’s former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell; French modeling scout Jean-Luc Brunel; and Leslie Wexner, the billionaire former owner of Victoria’s Secret, who was once a client of Epstein’s. The other names were redacted without explanation. The files, released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, specifies that only certain names be redacted — primarily those of Epstein’s victims.
But the DOJ has 15 days to explain the exemptions that they used to justify the redactions. The newly released batch of some 10,000 files make multiple references to President Donald Trump, including a January 2020 memo by an assistant US attorney revealing that Trump was on many more flights than the DOJ was aware of — between 1993 and 1996. On one of the flights, there were three passengers: Trump, Epstein and a 20-year-old woman; on two other flights, the prosecutor noted that Trump was on the plane with two women who could potentially be witnesses in the criminal case they were building at the time against Maxwell.
Trump has repeatedly denied he had any involvement in Epstein’s crimes. In 2024, he said on his social media platform, Truth Social, that he was “never on Epstein’s plane, or at his ‘stupid’ island.” The Department of Justice released a statement Tuesday saying a number of the do ents pertaining to the president were “untrue and sensationalist claims” that were made against Trump before the 2020 Election. The emails and correspondence involving Epstein’s 2007 sweetheart plea deal in South Florida was also heavily redacted. With few exceptions, all of the prosecutors’ names were blacked out, making it almost impossible to understand how his non-prosecution agreement unfolded, why it was kept secret and how Epstein received federal immunity in the first place.
At the time, Epstein was accused of sexually assaulting nearly 40 underage girls in his Palm Beach mansion. Do ents released earlier show that the DOJ not only had victims’ statements, but they also had supporting evidence, such as phone records, phone messages, witness statements and bank deposit records reflecting his payments to the girls. All three past do ent releases have been heavily redacted, including some photos of older men.
But the names of many of Esptein’s survivors have appeared throughout the pages, sometimes dozens of times, prompting victims to accuse the DOJ of violating the law — and trying to intimidate them. Some of them have called for US Attorney Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel to step down. “I am so disgusted with this administration,” said Haley Robson, who voted for Trump, told CNN. “I think Kash Patel and Pam Bondi both need to resign, and I would love to see Number 47 [Trump] get impeached over this.”
There were also an array of tips to the FBI and DOJ hotline about the case, one that the DOJ was forced to admit on Tuesday was an outright fake: a letter that appeared to be written by Epstein to Larry Nassar, the former U.S. Olympic Gymnastics coach and convicted rapist, after the letter went viral on the internet. The DOJ was finally forced to look into it and announced that a subsequent handwriting analysis ruled out Epstein had written it. “This fake letter serves as a reminder that just because a do ent is released by the Department of Justice does not make the allegations or claims within the do ent factual. Nevertheless, the DOJ will continue to release all material required by law,” the DOJ noted.
The records also showed that Epstein’s younger brother, Mark Epstein, filed a report with the FBI in 2023 claiming that his brother was murdered in his jail cell because he was about to “name names.”
Reached by phone Tuesday, Mark Epstein said that the FBI never followed up. Epstein, 71, has long believed that his brother was killed, and alleged in the tip that Trump “authorized” the late sex trafficker’s murder.
Asked why he believed Trump was involved, he said: “The question becomes, who would be in a position to orchestrate this and have the Justice Department cover it up?”
Khanna: You’ve got the DOJ releasing the names of survivors—which they are not allowed to do by law—but not releasing the FBI interview files with those same survivors. Those FBI interviews contain the names of other men: Wall Street tycoons and politicians…
if Biden had released derogatory information that would have been disreputable weaponization of justice
heads you lose, tails Trump wins
Last edited by Winehole23; 12-23-2025 at 10:39 PM.
no co-conspirators charged
even after the fact
(looking at you, JP Morgan -- follow the money)
why is Trump lying about never being on a flight with Epstein?
the obligation to lie when he's caught might do him in eventually
Felony convictions weren't even a speed bump for him. You guys don't care about your leaders being held accountable to the law. Anything to pwn the libs. Literally anything.
Because these s believe whatever he says. He might as well go all in and say that's not him in those pictures with Epstein. Fake media photoshopped them!
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...s-social-mediaSome Epstein file redactions are being undone with hacks
...
media on Monday evening. An exhibit in a civil case in the Virgin Islands against Darren K In and Richard D Kahn, two executors of Epstein’s estate, contains redacted allegations explaining how Epstein and his associates had facilitated the sexual abuse of children. The exhibit was the second amended complaint in the state case against In and Kahn.
In section 85, the redacted portion states: “Between September 2015 and June 2019, In signed (FAC) for over $400,000 made payable to young female models and actresses, including a former Russian model who received over $380,000 through monthly payments of $8,333 made over a period of more than three and a half years until the middle of 2019.”
Prosecutors in the Virgin Islands settled its civil sex-trafficking case against Epstein’s estate, In and Kahn in 2022 for $105m, plus one half of the proceeds from the sale of Little St James, the island on which Epstein resided and on which many of his crimes occurred. The justice department press release announcing the settlement did not include an admission of liability.
In , an attorney who represented Epstein for decades, has not been criminally indicted by federal authorities. He was hired by the Parlatore Law Group in 2022, before the justice department settled the Epstein case. That firm represents the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, and previously represented Donald Trump in his defense against charges stemming from the discovery of classified government do ents stored at Trump’s Florida estate. Calls and email seeking comment from In and the Parlatore Law Group have not yet been returned.
...
https://www.fox23.com/news/local/kie...31887f732.htmlFOX23 reached out to the Kiefer Police Department for further information regarding any gunshot wound death ruled a suicide around the time listed in the filing, but due to the redactions in the filings, the dept. said it makes it nearly impossible to connect any dots.
The police said though there were a couple cases they could recall during that time frame, whether they were directly in Kiefer or right outside Kiefer was up for debate. They also said tracking down any actual record after nearly 26 years can be difficult for them.
When speaking to the police, they said they reached out to the FBI to see if the Bureau could help the dept. in clearing some of the redactions in the filings for them, so they could search records for specific names, but the Bureau was unable to do so.
FOX23 also reached out to the Medical Examiner's Office for any reports out of Kiefer during that time frame and the Creek County Sheriff's Office for any cases that may have fallen under their jurisdiction during that time, but we have not heard back just yet.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/file...TA00020517.pdf
IT'S A HOAX
Trump is not only protecting elite pedos, he's protecting the money network that enabled it
https://spookyconnections.com/2025/1...ering-coverup/By mid-2007, investigators had unraveled at least twenty million dollars in dubious transfers between Epstein’s en ies and the private accounts of his distant associates, stretching from Europe to the Middle East. The inquiry, now running on hope and determination, slammed to a halt after senior officials reviewed the evidence and abruptly shrank its scope. They justified this as a question of jurisdiction and resources, but to agents whose mission had been abruptly sabotaged, these were hollow words. Nearly a quarter of the task force was torn away, and ten subpoenas were left to wither, silencing crucial leads. In a single stroke, 40% of the money trail vanished into darkness. Once urgent correspondence was reduced to info-only memos, the investigation, so close to the heart of Epstein’s network, was suddenly cold.
While the trafficking inquiry focused on victims, the financial branch exposed the intricate web of banks, s companies, and intermediaries that enabled, protected, and profited from abuse. This investigation revealed how Epstein’s wealth was systematically converted into influence, making these financial channels critical to amplifying his power and connecting the abuse with the underlying financial mechanisms.
Ultimately, the money-laundering case nearly exposed Epstein’s financial network before it was halted.
Who is being protected here?
https://x.com/jkbjournalist/status/2005045372247531728
DOJ was clocking Miami Herald reporter Julie K. Brown in 2019, for some reason
Why is Trump covering for elite pedos?
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/29/m...smid=url-share
Last edited by Winehole23; 12-30-2025 at 05:18 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
