Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Five Rings... Kori Ellis's Avatar
    My Team
    UCLA Bruins
    Post Count
    64,671
    I'm writing an article about UTSA football for another site. So I'm using you guys for research. I know that they had a feasibility student conducted recently but that the results haven't been released yet (right?)

    Anyway, I just need your opinions ...

    What do you think are the Pros/Cons of UTSA getting a football program?

    Do you think it will happen?

    Thanks,

    Kori
    Last edited by Kori Ellis; 11-20-2006 at 10:32 PM.

  2. #2
    1. its a wonderful idea cause San Antonio is too large to not have 1 single upper division CFB team

    2. i think it will eventually happen and there is a great talent pool in San Antonio, especially with UTSA being the one horse

    3. but, when and if it happens, your looking at least 5 years down the road for respectability from start

  3. #3
    Five Rings... Kori Ellis's Avatar
    My Team
    UCLA Bruins
    Post Count
    64,671
    None of you have answers for me other than John?

    (Thanks John)

  4. #4
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Longhorns
    Post Count
    28,298
    I think it will happen within the next 10 years

    Pros:
    Good talent in SA, Ready made facility (alamodome), no D-1 presence in town.

    Cons....TV market is not huge.....will not be a good team to start with. The coach will have to convince some good talent who could play elsewhere to stay at home.

  5. #5
    Since 1992 Brutalis's Avatar
    My Team
    Arkansas Razorbacks
    Post Count
    11,002
    UTSA is much like UALR. thats all i know.

  6. #6
    Agent Wonderbread j-6's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Longhorns
    Post Count
    4,284
    Sorry, boss lady.

    I don't see tens of thousands of San Antonians coming to see UTSA play Nichols State or SFA. Most new schools seeking to play D-1 football spend four or five years at the D-2 or I-AA level, then spend four or five years as an independent, and then maybe some lower echelon conference will pick them up.

    Check UCF out. They're in a one pro team town (Orlando) and are in a state full of power programs with lots of HS talent, very high student enrollment, a commuter school, and an existing large stadium (Citrus Bowl). They joined D-2 in '90, D-1 as an independent in '96, the MAC in '02, and C-USA in '05.

    If C-USA is the best UTSA can hope for, and that's fifteen years down the road, I wouldn't waste any time with this. Most San Antonians would rather stay at home and watch UT or A&M play on TV than go watch UTSA do battle with the East Carolina Pirates.

    It's a uva lot easier to develop a high powered mid-major basketball team in a larger metro market. Go check out the upset darlings of the last ten to twelve NCAA tournament and look where the teams came from. Spokane. Milwaukee. Arlington / DC. Memphis. Wichita. I'd devote resources to that first.

  7. #7
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Oregon State Beavers
    Post Count
    28,727
    It would be similar to Portland State here. PSU is D-1AA in football and their program is pretty good. They get a lot of Pac-10 players that transfer out because of lack of playing time. The admissions requirements aren't as tough as D-1 schools so you get some quality talent. I would see the same thing happening for UTSA as it pulls from the talent base of the Big-12. Attendance is so-so, but it's good entertainment value for the dollars you spend.

  8. #8
    Where do all of you get that there's a lot of talent around SA?

    Yeah there's a lot of high schools, but very few SA kids - relatively - go on to play D1 football.

  9. #9
    One of the big reasons football will probably never get off the ground at UTSA is because of le IX - UTSA would most likely have to add a few womens sports to equal out the scholarship numbers, and my guess is they don't want to spend that money.

    A better idea, imho, is to start up a D-I Hockey program. Normally D-II Nebraska-Omaha did this a few years ago and it's mainly been a success. They play in the same conference as Michigan, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Wisconsin, so they face quality compe ion that can attract crowds. It requires less scholarship numbers, and would be easy to set up using the AT&T Center. And before anyone mentions competing with the Rampage, Omaha also has a professional hockey team (the Knights) and a very successful amateur team (the Lancers).

  10. #10
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Longhorns
    Post Count
    28,298
    and use the florida international model
    well except for the whole "start a brawl" thing.

  11. #11
    well except for the whole "start a brawl" thing.
    Hey, everyone knows about FIU now!

  12. #12
    Dr. Pepper Johnny_Blaze_47's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas State Bobcats
    Post Count
    24,692
    At least by starting at D-IIA, you can establish rivalries with area schools (State, etc.), but starting in the Southland and building it up would probably be best. Although you would get on the map by serving as a doormat for UT and A&M every season.

  13. #13
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Longhorns
    Post Count
    28,298
    Hey, everyone knows about FIU now!
    Good point!!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •