Scratch off liberals because she knows she would be out of a job without them. As for Muslims, she only advocates killing the radical extreemists.Oh okay, so gays are crossed of that list. That just leaves Liberals and Muslims. Gotcha.
A wonder why I debate people who have only slander with no relavant facts. Perhaps you should thumb through a book of hers sometime and see what she is saying in its full context.
Wild Cobra - I'm not gonna argue with you, because your gonna disagree(your a conservative), but it's a fact that you can't accept, because a member of your party is a clueless/incomptent/any other degrading comment here. But, why is Coulter calling lot's of people gay? Clintons/Gore/Edwards/Liberals? Is being gay something bad? Why does she have a gay friend then? I wonder what that 'friend' of Coulter thinks of her calling others gay as a dergotory term.
in the dictionary is a picture of Ann coulter and nancy grace.
Can anybody diagram that sentence?
Look at all these s defending that coulter. s stick together and have each others backs or s.
Help me understand something please. Wasn't the intent of this thread pointing out the degrading behavior that Ann Coulter uses against others? Why is it that people who argue against her behavior, like you, exercise exactly the same behavior?
And again, I am not a republican. My values are primarily conservative and libertarian based and firmly rooted in the intent of our cons ution.
I’m not familiar with remarks attributed to her calling other gay. As for follow-ups to the remark, she clearly said she something to the effect that wouldn’t offend the gay community by comparing them to Edwards!
Please supply me with the quotes of her calling other gay. Please support that contention.
You all may want to see this clip, an audience member from when Coulter used the word “ got” explains the context of her usage:
Fox Defends Coulter - Edwards Isn't a 'Real' Man
Now according to Mic e Malkin, she agrees the joke was bad:
Mic e Malkin comments on Coulter
Here is the entire Chris Matthews program. It is actually a very good show for Hardball. Mrs. Edwards call starts about half way in part 4:
Hardball w/Chris Matthews-Coulter-Edwards Pt 1 of 7
Hardball w/Chris Matthews-Coulter-Edwards Pt 2 of 7
Hardball w/Chris Matthews-Coulter-Edwards Pt 3 of 7
Hardball w/Chris Matthews-Coulter-Edwards Pt 4 of 7
Hardball w/Chris Matthews-Coulter-Edwards Pt 5 of 7
Hardball w/Chris Matthews-Coulter-Edwards Pt 6 of 7
Hardball w/Chris Matthews-Coulter-Edwards Pt 7 of 7
You have.That is your opinion. I don't consider her fitting the ' ' category. Confrontational, yes. , no. Ann Coulter is actually rather personable. She knows what she is talking about, is seldom wrong, and doesn't offer up immediate answers without some prior thought.
These are your words, right?:
Your opinion, not factually supportable.
Racy, yes. She normally wears a short black dress. Stupid, absolutely not. Isn't that name-calling? Like Hilton, give me a break. You should control your comments before complaining about others.
Here, your insinuating she is a racist, and would kill blacks.
No name calling? No derogatory statements?
Ann Coulter's own explaination for attacking the Jersey Girls:
Ann Coulter Crazy On The Today Show
I’m sure some of you haven’t see this yet. Could it be prophetic? After two years of democrat control congress, Sheehan shooting spree, etc?
Coulter & Limbaugh Introduce 1/2 Hour News Hour
Notice how they can mock themselves…
Aren't they cute!!! It almost made me forget about the deliberately misleading evidence the WH planted to justify this comedy of errors. And I damn near forgot about the Bush re s that have been underground for 7 years. Praise the Lord.
Actuall, I IMMEDIATELY thought XRay, Yawny, and Gtrick.
^^Funny, I don't think of you at all.
The same demographic that reelects an incompetent president because they are scared.
Maybe(to spare me from reading her ) you could explain why she claims that liberals are pro choice because they like to kill babies. Where are her facts for that claim? She's a stupid , who makes money because stodgy, idiot conservatives can't comprehend logic.
I don't remeber the context that way.
Quote please, and source link, then I will respond. I will not respond to a mischaractorization of her words.
You really believe that?
Think about that idiotic statement for just 1/2 a second. If Bush planted evidence, wouldn't he have planted substantial WMD?
Bingo. Arguing with Yoni and his adoring fan is pointless, he will follow his political party to the bitter end. They could commit mass genocide and these blind sheep would still follow these sorry excuses for human beings.
I think Coulter and Rosie and Sheehan are people that should be exterminated from existance or kept in solitary confinement. See what I just did there? How I didn't polarize to one side like the Yoni's of the world will always do? You don't even need to read the posts and you already know the subject matter.
This is why party politics is a failure, it doesn't aim to further human goals, it furthers the special interest goals. This is why the United States is always behind 5-10 years in social issues compared to the rest of society. Why it took us so long to abolish horrible ins utions and why we have the death penalty and this pointless war. Why the immigration debate has become a stalemate and remain unsolved. When a person's personal beliefs veto something the people overwhelmingly support. Why this country gets weaker every year and will be sharing the superpower status within our lifetimes. Why the world hates us and why this forum is for entertainment and nothing serious. Why no problem proposed in a topic here has ever been solved but degraded into a 2 sided debate.
I personally don't mind, it's entertaining and humanity has a tendency to self-correct itself as people notice the failures of the current system.
As to why people like Coulter are dangerous, and why their opinions matter. As to why we can criticize them while being hypocritical?
They have power. We don't.
They have influnce over millions of sheep. We don't. And power is dangerous, it changes people and not always for the better. And frankly, people Coulter and Sheehan are dangerous with their hate-filled rhetoric.
That one conference room at the WH contained only a certain amount of people neccesary to agree on a collusive conclusion.
To suggest he's intelligent enough to have planned ahead for planting WMD's is a reach, at best. By then, all the worlds eyes were watching, and that's where I give him credit. Credit for not pulling off another bonehead move. You forget that one individual has admitted the hard truths of using deliberately misleading evidence to go along with other exagerated, and just flat wrong evidence.
Let's play it from your perspective, shall we? All the evidence is dead on, 100% accurate. Invading Iraq was the only response, and this team of WH execs. are just the people to do it.
What we discovered is that this team couldn't find it's way out of a parking lot, and can't plan beyond the meal they're eating. It's a neverending incompetence train. These fools think they should be playing in the big game. They shouldn't even be allowed the watch the game from a sports bar. They have destroyed everything that America has stood for and it will take decades for our country to correct it. We used to mean something in the world and now we stand for something entirely opposite.
You see, I think it's a bad thing to have most of the world turn against you. Just ask Hitler.
Yes they loved us, especially people like you, so much
they blew up the WTC, twice, our embassies and our
barracks. Yes we were so loved by the world. And now
they have turned against us. Give me a break.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJlKE_BLAUM
Your next President xray
^^If he is elected, you are right, he will be my President. But
he wont be elected with my help.
And you think we're dangerous?
Like anyone would have to twist her words to make her sound like satan.
Right-wing organizations buy her books in bulk to pump up her numbers and thus make it look like she's a successful author. What was Chris Matthews' rationale for having her on his show? "Say what you will about her, but she sells books."
I have to believe that she's a professional troll. I don't doubt that she's a conservative, but her career path is a little different than that of George Will or David Brooks. Only way to really hurt somebody like her is to ignore her...eventually she'll have to up the ante to get attention, and then one day she'll say or write something so beyond the pale that she'll be shunned in mainstream circles.
In a just world, she'd be exiled to Mississippi or Alabama, forever unable to interact with the East Coast liberal intellectuals she loves to torment.
For what? Thought crimes? No thanks, that's a bit too Nazi Germany, Soviet Union for my tastes.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote