Tiago for the Spurs, Scola for the Rockets
Why?
Splitter C
Scola PF
Here's a question that we will not know the answer to for several years, but should be fun to ponder right now.
Better fit for the Spurs in the long term: Splitter or Scola.
Why?
Tiago for the Spurs, Scola for the Rockets
Why?
Splitter C
Scola PF
i think Scola because timmy will play 5 in his last career years
Splitter. He's younger, has the ability to play two positions (unlike Scola) which makes him more versatile, and he has much much better potential on the defensive end of the court than Scola - which is ultimately what drives playing time around here.
splitter is the spurs future
Looks like Mahinmi has plummeted off the radar screen and the search parties need to be sent out.
Check Austin.
Splitter. Scola can only play post offense. Splitter can do everything else.
Splitter. He didn't when the Spurs drafted him.
Splitter:
Youth - by 5 years or so
Versatility: can play both PF & C
Potential: Better at D than Scola. His O isn't as needed as his D to the Spurs at this time/when he comes and plays next year. Once TD goes then it will be needed more. By that time maybe he will have upped his game or other players take up the slack. Either way his D is much more important to the Spurs than is O.
i hope when he comes over, has a good number jersey though...
not even close, scola is a much better offensive player. splitter might be an average nba big man. might is the key word. spurs can't go forever with only one option on offense down low. scola + duncan on the blocks would've been unstoppable.
Splitter will benefit from another year playing for a premier Euro team in a leadership role. I thought Scola would have worked on the Spurs as a backup for Duncan and occasionally playing next to him. But either he didn't want to or the Spurs FO didn't want him, and that's kind of a tired topic.
I was looking forward to watching Manu, Oberto, and Scola playing together. I am also not so happy with Scola landing in Houston. Scola could be a good fit with Adelman's offensive style (Scola does not help Yao stay out of foul trouble though).
Splitter is a better fit with the Spurs because of his youth, athleticism, ability to defend and rebound. Scola will be happier starting with the Rockets. I am not sure Scola would handle coming off the bench as well as Manu and Oberto have. Once Splitter became available, Scola became expendable.
Scola's price tag wasn't that bad. It would have been nice to keep both. Like many, I will be watching how Scola does.
Pop couldn't even play Robinson + Duncan on the blocks.scola + duncan on the blocks would've been unstoppable.
Pretty obvious for the long term. Splitter is not only young, but his main strength is defense, and that's what the Spurs system is about. Scola would have given us a boost on offense and helped carry the scoring load, but that's about it.
I will wait until the end of the season...
Can't WAIT to see Splitter play!
splitter cuz we traded scola.
Definately Tiago. A legit 7'0" shoes (i think he measured 6'10.5" without shoes in 2003 as an 18 year old) with a good standing reach. Most importantly knows how to play on the defensive end.
Splitter will presumably be around for a long time, even after TD's retirement and can complement TD during his remaining years.
Scola would have been a back-up PF to TD for the forseeable future and maybe for the rest of TD's career.
Based on reports, Scola has the edge on offense with Splitter better on defense, probably because of at ude as much as anything.
We've got plenty of firepower, but we need a good long defender.
Splitter works best for me.
Scola > Splitter > Bonner.
But why decide between Scola and Spitter if we had a chance to have both? we should've let Bonner go![]()
I'd say the one that actually wants to play for the Spurs is a better fit.
That is bs. When did Scola said he didn't want to play for the Spurs? Post a link please or stop saying that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)