Hopefully they only pitch their one pitcher and not score runs like this from here on out
to bad dbacks can not score runs
and they only have one pitcher
Hopefully they only pitch their one pitcher and not score runs like this from here on out
so far the rockies have scored 15 runs in their series not as many as the snakes
I have NO idea what caused people say the D-backs had no chance.
I'm a Cubs fan, and I thought we'd win the series, but I thought it would be 3-2 or MAYBE 3-1 if we won Game 1.
The Snakes have a great top-to-bottom lineup and they're playing well.
However, if they continue to load the bases and give up walks and hits to lead off innings, they are going to get crushed when the other team doesn't choke and ground into DPs.
Great series though, D-backs. You guys earned it a of a lot more than my own team did.
i still strongly disagree. it's a mediocre line-up at best - and that's when Hudson is in it.
however, they're still major leaguers and if they're playing well at the right time, anything can happen (i.e. 2006 Cardinals' pitching staff).
anyone who said that the DBacks didn't have a chance a)ignored playoff history and b)really ignored the cubs' history.
Well, it's not stellar, but what I meant when I said great is that anyone in the Arizona lineup can beat you. If they're hitting, it's tough to deal with.
Holy , this is the most poorly written thread le I've ever seen.16 runs =dbacks cubs 6
dbacks owned the cubs that series
Yeah, what's with the random bump?
just that only ducks could take an easy thread le like "D-Backs 16, Cubs 6" and turn it into a godawful mess like "16 runs =dbacks cubs 6"
Damn, Ducks must be dyslexic, I always knew something was wrong with him...
I just saw this for the first time..the man is truly a legend..
16 runs =dbacks cubs 6
Ahh the memories, this one sucked to lose but the only reason we even made the PS was due to the lousy division we played in. Losing against the Manny Ramirez Dodgers next year hurt much, much more.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)