If Bird is holding out for Bynum AND Odom...do you really think he would take Oberto & Elson? The salaries are no where near matching anyways.
Banana for a Snack Pack.
If Bird is holding out for Bynum AND Odom...do you really think he would take Oberto & Elson? The salaries are no where near matching anyways.
Bet he'd take Ginobili off your hands.![]()
There's almost no trade for a big name player that wouldn't involve breaking up the Big Three for required salary. I'm not ready to break up that 3 time championship (2003,2005,2007) core just yet for a player who may or may not fit the system.
beside the fact, that this is a totally unrealistic scenario, it's better to check the basic rules of CBA for trades before making clueless proposals.
Are you the guy with the radio show?
However, I don't know who gets welcome Elson with opens arms, we couldn't get anything good for him. Oberto? I glad he's on our teams and not on rival team conference like Lakers, he knows enough defensive on Tim. With Ime and next year Tiago or Mahinmi in the team, I think on Barry/Elson/Beno leaving the Spurs.
Beno, Barry and next years 1st round pick in exchange for Kevin Durant
Bonner for Scola
Last edited by smeagol; 10-11-2007 at 09:14 AM.
I would have jumped for Parker for Kidd two years ago. But not now. I don't know, maybe Barry and Beno for Caron Butler.
manu for kobe
Beno + Barry or Finley + draft pick for Danny Granger.
riiiight
Heck, I would trade Beno and Barry for Ben and Jerry's right now.
![]()
Last edited by Jimcs50; 10-11-2007 at 02:31 PM.
Logically, it doesn't seem that bad to me; the Clippers are paying a large salary so Elton can sit on their bench until next year, when he leaves. They are effectively losing Elton whether they trade him or not; the only difference is whether they can get someone else to pay a salary which can't help them, and maybe even pick up a few useful items (Beno/Barry/2008 second rounder).
Step back for a minute, forget it's Brand, and ask "What will the player's contribution be equivalent to this year, the final year of his contract (assuming he opts out and leaves)?" The answer is, almost nothing, certainly nothing to help them into the playoffs, but it might actually hurt them where the lottery is concerned, and the salary (which they get no beneficial return on) also hurts them.
As for checking the CBA for rules on trade proposals, get a life. Maybe my proposal is clueless when it comes to the rules, but I'm not going to read through a book of rules, down to appendix B, subsection C for a recreational (fun) fan post. If the idea's stupid, ignore it. I am certainly no expert on such rules, and I don't really care to be, unless you can tell me in a couple sentences exactly what rules my screwball proposal violates. If the answer is, "You'll have to read this 20 page pamphlet," that's more than I care to do; this is apparently more recreational for me than it is for you (please tell me you're not from the Spurs front office, trolling this site for suggestions). I would also wager that I enjoy my time here more than you do, because I can imagine a (fantasy) scenario without having to correct myself (Oh, but that ridiculous scenario is completely implausible given that paragraph 4 of subsection F on page 32 of the trade rules index states...). Lighten up, this isn't serious.
P.S. You don't have to point out that Beno for Lebron isn't realistic either.
I like this trade but the Pacers would want TP or Manu for Granger.
Bruce Bowen & Marcus Williams for Josh Smith.
Parker for Kidd
when has he been right last
scola is not the best player the spurs could trade for
he does not fit in this team
why trade for him? To waste a roster spot?
I don't want to see him go, but i think our chances for a 1st repeat and 3 of 4 would increase with
Parker and Eva for
Kobe and Wrinkleson
It was a joke, just like 80% of the posts in this thread.
Next time I will useor the
to help you out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)