Reply With Quote
These comparisons minimize an important fact. The Spurs' Big Three play more or less "traditional" roles, with the possible exception of Parker. (Parker doesn't need to be the next John Sotckton in the Spurs' system.) Sure, Ginobili is also a slasher, but he can and does play like a traditional SG when the situation calls for it.
In contrast, the Celtics' Big Three were all the primary options on their respective teams, and they have been allowed to do whatever they want. Despite the protests of his supporters, KG has no low post game. If he does, then why doesn't he use it? In other words, KG does not play like a traditional PF or C. Similarly, Pierce would rather take jumpshots from the perimeter, and he plays more like a SG. Allen plays like a traditional SG, but obviously, he isn't exactly known for his mental toughness. In the final analysis, you have three players who have to: 1) Adapt to a new role on a new team (this even applies to Pierce, with all of the player turnover); 2) Learn how to play together, communicate on the floor, etc.; and 3) Make some major adjustments in their playing styles so that all three can be effective on the court at the same time.
Do you really think Doc Rivers has the leadership skills to pull this off?
For the sake of staying on topic, I will add that individually the Celtics look pretty good, but I would take the Spurs' Big Three and their more reasonable contracts.
