i don't think he meant "Democratic allies" to be our Democrats per se. i think he means everyone over there that see how our politicians are trying to manipulate the war. the ones that are lending a "helping hand"
I agree this genocide resolution is stupid. Have we passed a resolution about the native American ethnic cleansing we committed?
i don't think he meant "Democratic allies" to be our Democrats per se. i think he means everyone over there that see how our politicians are trying to manipulate the war. the ones that are lending a "helping hand"
I think his denial about Iraq has led to paranoia.
I don't know. Did you kill all those "native American's".
I didn't.
Nope, just like present-day Turks didn't kill the Armenians.
maybe we could satisfy them with casinos
It's not just that the resolution is stupid but that it has a seditious intent.
Then charge them with sedition or shut up. I've had enough of neocons whining about traitors and sedition. If they actually are doing so, it will be easy enough to arrest and torture them.
What a shame:
Murtha: Armenian Genocide Vote to Fail
But, perhaps the damage is already done:
Turkish MPs back attacks in Iraq
yoni thinks turkey's going to attack because of a resolution.
they have 60,000 troops just waiting for the OK. what are you trying to get at?
they already have troops in Iraq.
this has been on the burner for a long time.
nothing to do with a supposed resolution.
I agree with that. The resolution wouldn't help at all, but even if it never existed the Turks would still be massing at the border. The Kurds are unable or unwilling to keep their people from ing with Turkey. That is the real problem.
Look, it's just irresponsible for neocons to suggest that Turkey makes this move because of some bull resolution. They refuse to acknowledge who's responsible. Anything to protect their savior.
Say it's seditious. It's sexier.Look, it's just irresponsible for neocons to suggest that Turkey makes this move because of some bull resolution.
Besides, this is just another byproduct of Bush's failure to send enough troops into Iraq in the first place. His incompetence is seditious.
this "supposed resolution" you're refering to is this armenian thing, right?
right. nothing to do with turk moves
so this breaking news of 60,000 troops getting the ok to attack and the armenian genocide vote are completely non-coincidential?
this is not breaking news. they're are tired of their troops being killed, and they aren't being killed due to some "supposed" resolution. yoni is the only fool trying marry this action.
More like Turkey is unable or unwilling to stop ing with Kurds.
you didn't answer the question, chump. are these events non-related, non-coincidential? yes or no. no essay. it's just hard for me to believe that they "non-coincidentially" ok'd to move on the Kurds right after this armenian vote passed. why have they decided all of the sudden to move at this point when we had always advised them that killing the Kurds wouldn't be a good move?
15 Turkish soldiers were recently killed, in Turkey, by some militant Kurdish force that has been crossing the border to wreak havoc. It's not the Turks that are doing the ing with.
We and Iraq have assured Turkey that we will deal with the problem and have asked them to stay their hand. Pelosi's resolution works (intentionally, I hasten to add) to undermine this tenuous agreement.
i did answer. you're free to believe what you want. the turks are going to move, one way or another in N.Iraq. the resolution, whether it passes or is revoked, has nothing to do with turk soldiers constantly under fire.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)