Reply With Quote
Who the is Jerry Stackhouse ?
“They had, as we would see it, an easy road,” Stackhouse said. “Really, their main threat was Phoenix, who imploded and messed up their chances."
Such jealous comments are expected when the Spurs, this current NBA era's most successful franchise, have won 3 championships in 5 years.... while Dallas continues to win 60+ games year after year with no championship. It's funny to see comments like that and Dirk's after the 2006 Finals "We gave them the championship".
Dallas Mavs are officially the could've-would've-should've-excuses-excuses-excuses franchise of this decade.
And our only threat was Phoenix? Stackhouse makes it sound like the other 2nd round teams (GS and Utah) weren't good. Guess what, Jerry....your team was 1-5 vs. those teams during the season! Because success is measured against Dallas, right?
Who the is Jerry Stackhouse ?
Jerry Stackhouse lives in Dallas, Jeff Drums. You better retract your comments, or he'll show up at the next Josh Daniels Band gig ready to shank your ass.
"I'M FROM DETROIT, BEYOTCH!"
I dont think he can do that. The Josh Daniels band is on the rise now. That performance at Fouts Field was ing epic. They now have body guards as well.
that STEAKhouse is a Funny guy
steak goes good in tacos.
Jeff is currently laying Lindsay Lohan and the latest exploits of the JDB are being chronicled on defamer, gawker, the superficial and all the other celebrity gossip blogs. In fact, Jeff was photographed getting out of a limo with his vagina exposed.
easy road hhahahaa
first round opponent was GSW, how easier can that be
LMAO sour grape!
Golden State was outmuscled by Utah, Utah was outmuscled by Spurs. Golden State embarrassed Dallas. Do the math stackho
, we gave Dallas the championship the year before and they choked it away.
Don't hate us for being able to close the deal, Stack.
I like most of the mavs players. Stackhouse is the exception to that. I can't defend those words as I totally disagree. San Antonio was too good.
Here's to regular season champion, Jerry Stackhouse
ing classless
Brad Miller, Ron Artest and Justin Williams.
Thugs, rapists, wifebeaters, animal abusers...
Ladies and Gentlemen, your 2007-08 Sacramento Queefs.
I remember half a dozen or so pretty well regarded posters on this site who said this was the Spurs easiest run to a le ever. Why is a message from a non-Spur/non-Spurs fan taken differently than the same message from a Spur/Spurs fan?
Five, six, five, four... Compare to the other runs. I mean, 04-05 was 5-6-5-7... or 23 games to win the le. Last year was only 20 games.
It was a pretty easy run.
A team that didnt get fully assembled until around the AS break in the 1st round.
A team with a coach an no depth (not to mention the suspensions) in the second
A team with very little playoff experience playing for the first time in the WCF with a young team
And then the worst team to ever make into the Finals
It was a easy road, but Stack should still shut his mouth, losing in the 1st round to an 8th seed gives you no room to talk ever
I don't disagree that Stackhouse shouldn't be the one breaking a story like this. It's not smart. but I think he was point out the obvious more than slighting the Spurs. Perhaps I'm wrong... It happens frequently...
I think the stupidity lies in that they had it easier than anybody else. They were the number 1 seed, playing the 8th seed. And they blew it. And now this same guy comes out talking about how easy another team had it, when they had it easier than anybody else.
Moral of the story: Shut the up, play the games and win, before talking about anybody else.
Why the fixation on seeds? In 2006 the Spurs drew the Kings, who were a much better team than the 5th-seeded Grizzlies that the Mavs got.
Stackhouse wasn't calling out the Spurs, he was just pointing out the obvious. What a bunch of sensitive vaginas.
What's obvious ? that the Mavs got their vaginas violated in the 1st round ?
If the Mavs can't get past the 1st round, that means they can't win the le; the Spurs won and deserved it.
Troll
What's obvious is that the 87-88 Mavericks would wipe the floor with Steve Crap, Tim Pusscan and whatever other you could throw at them. Roy Tarpley was a beast!
Stack didn't say the Spurs didn't deserve their le, he just pointed out that they had a pretty easy route, all things considered.
Great point. Too bad it will get lost as most people won't read beyond this...
What's obvious is that the 87-88 Mavericks would wipe the floor with Steve Crap, Tim Pusscan and whatever other you could throw at them. Roy Tarpley was a beast!
Of course the Spurs deserved it. They won. The point is that they had an easy road to the trophy this season, with their only real compe ion being eliminated by the NBA front office. The Spurs are wily, play dirty, use cheap shots and get bailed out by the refs and Stern, but they are still the most dominant team of the last 10 years or so.
Regardless of anyone's opinion of them they have won 4 rings now, something that most teams cannot lay claim to.
That's about as much props as can be reasonably expected from a Laker fan.
Stop being such vaginas with rabbit ears sensitive to the slightest criticism and enjoy the Spurs success.
There is not too much left before placing that team into a retirement home.
Who cares what posters think? Tim Duncan and many of the players have gone on record and said this was probably their hardest le run in terms of compe ion they had to go through to get the ring.
Then why the fewest amount of games needed to win a le since the expansion to a 7-7-7-7 format?
It doesn't take anything away from a four-time Champion that a run wasn't terribly difficult. Save for a few instances in the Phoenix series, the Spurs le was never in doubt.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
