Reply With Quote
keep making up and you might eventually believe yourself.
can you find quotes that i said any of those things? no you cannot. stop your useless trolling clown.
you idiot. whoever asked you anything? i see you get owned on a daily basis on this forum. i only went to that level after "weak vagina" smack was brought in. you actually have threads calling for you to be banned, and i see that you get no respect from anyone else either. so once again, i will go to verbage that a simple minded like you might comprehend: go yourself pussy.
keep making up and you might eventually believe yourself.
can you find quotes that i said any of those things? no you cannot. stop your useless trolling clown.
also, as suggested to you in a previous post, learn to read. an expanded vocabulary will result. the word benevolent makes no sense there in that sentence, but that should be no surprise as all of your posts are illogcal nonsense.
Could you repeat that again? My mind kind of wandered toward the end.
gladly,
go yourself pussy
lol, Kwame Brown
that's about what anyone should expect from you on both an information and written level. Huh? is as eloquent and well spoken as you seem to get.
lmao, Mavs in the post season
lol, struggling to make post season
well stretch and findog,
i am done with you two idiots. i started in this thread having a legitimate basketball conversation with some actual fans of the NBA, but it has now deteriorated into mindless banter with a couple of ignorant trolls.
i have to end this circle jerk now, before one of you ends up hurting yourself with your keyboard.
Good Day to both of you brilliant young posters.
Of course the Spurs deserved it. They won. The point is that they had an easy road to the trophy this season, with their only real compe ion being eliminated by the NBA front office. The Spurs are wily, play dirty, use cheap shots and get bailed out by the refs and Stern, but they are still the most dominant team of the last 10 years or so.
So which is it? Did they beat Phoenix because they're the better team and they deserved it, or did they receive a gift from the commissioner's office? Pick a lane please.
"The letter of the law worked in the Spurs favor, allowing them to advance past a team that they would not have otherwise beaten."
Let's take away Game Five. We're still left with three Spurs victories to the Suns' two. Forget about Phoenix not having an answer for Tim Duncan, and having to bring a seldom-used big off the bench to guard him and how that negatively affects how they run their offense. Forget about them not being able to control the boards against San Antonio. Forget about the fact that for the past three years, they've been beaten consistently by the Spurs. Forget about the fact that San Antonio is the only team in the League that can beat them at their own game, an up-tempo running style. We're supposed to believe that Phoenix was definitely going to win that series if the Horry-Nash sequence hadn't taken place. Would having Amare and Diaw available for Game Five increase the Suns' chances of winning? Sure. But the Spurs won three other games just fine with them playing.
As for your comments regarding the 2003 conference finals, you claimed the Spurs were "on the ropes." In danger of losing Game Six and having to play a Game Seven on their home court against a depleted Mavericks squad that couldn't effectively guard Tim Duncan and had a coach uninterested in doing so? Sure. "On the ropes" and in danger of losing that series? Nope. Maybe if that Game Seven had taken place and the Mavericks were ahead late in the fourth quarter, that would be true, but you're getting ahead of yourself. There has to be a Game Seven first for that to be true.
Here's more diarrhea:
"that (2003 Dallas squad) was a very talented Mavs team, maybe your best shot at a le to date."
Very talented? Yes. Best shot at a le to date? Uh, no. That would be the team that was 5 minutes away from taking a 3-0 lead in the Finals and blew it. Just FYI, it takes 16 games to win a le. The 06 Mavs came within two wins. The 03 team came up 6 short. Of course they would've beaten New Jersey, but they weren't nearly as good as the Spurs that time around, so it's a moot point. The 06 Mavs were a much better defensive team on the interior, allowing them to get away without double-teaming Duncan all the time so they could stay home on the Spurs' perimeter players. The 03 team got by with a zone against lesser teams and couldn't handle a team like San Antonio that runs its half-court sets with precision and had Tim Duncan at his 25 and 15 peak.
As for your name: TonyParkersux? Is that hyperbole or do you honestly believe that? Are you here to troll or do you honestly think he is a below-average NBA player? Either you're a bag or you don't know anything about basketball. Pick a lane please.
lmao who is this TonyParkerSux ?
we're about to rape you of your best player and you want to talk ?
enjoy being the laughingstock of the league again.
lol, Jim Buss running things
lol, As Kobe Turns
maybe then you can finally get a trophy in your case?? who the is a bag wannabe BillyHayes Mavs fan to ever talk mess?
win something.
lol, Brian Cook
lol, 2007 Lakers. Go masturbate to Showtime clips on youtube.
lol, Mitch Kupchak
lOL Dallas Mavericks and their eternally championship-less history
lol first round exit
lol mark cuban
at least my team has championship footage that i can reference.
go masturbate to dirk being fouled by Manu in game 7.
lol, bandwagon 14-yr-olds bringing up ancient history
lol dirk nowitzki
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions