Since the ultra-strict gambling rules didn't remotely stop the Donaghy situation, why punish the refs who didn't do anything other than use a slot machine or have a poker night? Donaghy never needed to set foot in a casino to do what he did. I'd imagine that the changing of the gambling rules is going to be coupled with more stringent checking of the refs' offcourt activities and financial transactions, and that one is a bone the league threw at the union to get them to sign off on the other.

Reply With Quote
