Reply With Quote
nov turner is one ing main reason the chargers are still playing
props to him for expanding the play book for more then lt
you just owned Timvp. I told him also that the colts would choke more than the chargers.
nov turner is one ing main reason the chargers are still playing
props to him for expanding the play book for more then lt
Did you two notice that the main chokers were out injured? Where in my post did I say Billy Volek, Michael Turner, Darren Sproles or Legedu Naanee were chokers?
It had to take the perfect storm of injuries for the Chargers to advance. Props.
...i think you're nuts. the chargers have a better chance with LT in the lineup and getting a majority of the carries.
Chargers match up well against Indy, especially with all the colts injuries, and for whatever reason SD just owns the colts. The pats aren't the colts and the last time i checked NE owns SD. People are overrated SD based on the colts victory but brady doesn't lose it under pressure like Manning, he'll scan the field and find the open guy like he did last week. NE 38 SD 14
The Pats kicked the Bolts ass first time this year. The Chargers handed last years playoff game to the Pats last year. The Bolts beat the Pats 41-17 their previous meeting, ending their Gillette streak. Not exactly what I'd call "ownage" but the Patriots are definitely and rightly favored to win this upcoming game.
I also went to the game, I think it was 2002, when LT scored the game winning touchdown in overtime and rushed for around 200 yards against the Pats. The Patriots were the defending champs at the time.
One thing is for sure, if LT rushes on them like he did in the first half of last years playoffs Norv will continue to give him the ball in the second half, unlike Marty.
Pats - 34
Bolts - 37
Sproles is the X- factor once again.
I'm not sayin' he can duplicate Desmond Howard, I'm just sayin'.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/16/sp...ll&oref=slogin
Straight from the horses mouth.
"“They’re good, they’re real good,” said Belichick, sounding slightly exasperated that everyone in the media room was not following his line of thinking. “They beat the Colts twice. I don’t know what else they need to do or can do. They couldn’t do any more. They’ve done everything they could do since that middle part of the season.”
Everyone in the media that I have heard or read, including Los Angeles, is picking the Patriots.
ESPN's simulations predict that the likeliest outcome of the game involves the Chargers being ground into a powder-blue stain in the Foxboro snow.
and all of espn's analysts gave sd absolutely no chance against Indy, so what weight does their simulation hold?
Chargers - 35
Patriots - 21
okay, now that you've given your "I hate the Patriots and won't ever pick them or give them credit for anything" opinion, what do you REALLY think the score will be? Not even TSA thinks the Chargers can handle the Pats by two touchdowns.
I think it's possible, but it isn't my prediction.
well it's possible that Peyton Manning will run naked onto the field with goldencasino.com tatooed on his asscheeks but I think we're smart enough to know that it won't happen.
My prediction stands. This way, I'm in a win-win situation.
If they lose, then oh well, they were expected to lose. So what?
If they win, I look like a genius.
you've become merrill hogeMy prediction stands. This way, I'm in a win-win situation.
If they lose, then oh well, they were expected to lose. So what?
If they win, I look like a genius.
My prediction stands. This way, I'm in a win-win situation.
If they lose, then oh well, they were expected to lose. So what?
If they win, I look like a genius.
are you like Mono?
exactly.
No, cuz I hate the Pats, you bandwagonning POS.
Chargers by 2
Thread over. SAS third grader putdowns and "lurker" status easily makes him the chump of the NFL board.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
