how can you say the Cavs won't be better than Detroit when they beat them in a 7 game series last year? I know the Cavs didn't make any moves, but neither did the Pistons
DET is a better team than CLE. Sorry, they are flat out better and should never have lost last year.
They improved their bench a lot this year, while the Cavs are pretty much the same team all around. I know your a CLE fan and you don't like it when ppl talk about your team but there is just no way you guys sniff the Finals anytime soon with DET and BOS. You aren't good enough to beat them.
maybe they shouldn't have lost, but they DID lose, and they came within a rebound away from losing to them in 2006. I don't care what people say about the Cavs, the only time I interject is when people are wrong-which you are right now. Boston might be a better team, but Detroit can lose to the Cavs because it has happened before. People said last year exactly what you are saying and guess what, they made it to the Finals. You are treating your assumptions like fact, yet you try to ignore the fact that the Cavs beat the Pistons in a 7 game series in 2007, and took them 7 games in 2006. The way you are talking is that the Cavs don't even stand a chance against them, which in that case you are dead wrong.
Since we are making assumptions: The Warriors will never make it past the first round, and the Spurs will never make the Finals as long as Dallas and Phoenix are in the West
Last edited by Thunder Dan; 01-29-2008 at 09:27 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote