Reply With Quote
he was never ing with montana to begin with
and always will be. Brady could win 3 more, he'll always be second best now
he was never ing with montana to begin with
You think Brady's ankle played a role?
He was pressured, but when he had time he was uncharacteristically off, especially on the deep throws.
And being #2 behind Montana is nothing to scoff at.
hes number 3.... joey > steve > brady
give me Favre too
and aikman
and aikman
Throw in an Elway for me.
Brady Quinn > Tom Brady
and always will be for now on
Don't forget about the "Blonde Bomber." He was 4-0 in Superbowls and defeated Roger Staubach twice, head to head.
No thanks, give me Brady over him any day.Don't forget about the "Blonde Bomber." He was 4-0 in Superbowls and defeated Roger Staubach twice, head to head.
Are you a Cowboy fan?
I think Bradshaw was overrated. Terrible stats. And he himself admits that if it wasn't for the 4 rings due to playing on a dominat defense like the Steelers was in those days, there is no way he would have been able to sniff the HOF, and that he was very lucky to be in the position that he was.
Yeah, stats make the quarterback. And by the way, when Brady didn't play on a team with a dominant defense, he lost.
Montana would have gotten is ass beat if his o-line had ever played like that in a SB. And I dont think he would have gotten back up
The ironic thing is that Brady had, IMO, his best group of receivers this year.
If you have less than a second to throw the ball, great receivers don't help you as much.
I saw that game several times this year.
Very true.
LMAO me too ... about 4 times ... then I stopped watching the games.
That's another reason why I hated how people used to compare Brady's and Peyton's recievers. If I had a choice between having great recievers with little time to throw, or average recievers with all day to throw, give me all day, EVERY TIME. Brady has always had hours to sit in the pocket, unlike Peyton. Now that he has some pressure, despite having one of the most solid recieving cores we've ever seen (better than anything Manning has EVER had), it didn't help him much. Now Brady lovers can understand why Peyton had troubles despite having good recievers. It doesn't matter who is on your offense if you dont have time to get the ball to them.
Manning > Brady.
I've seen Manning have that game as well.
1A - Manning
1B - Brady
Neither would be as successful without a quality OL.
Not to always throw this one out there, but Elway was extremely successful with a God awful offensive line.
Wasn't until the last three years of his career that the group came together.
I'd easily take Elway over Brady.
Bradshaw, Montana, and Aikman never lost a Super Bowl.
They are all greater than Brady.
If the Mannings win multiple SBs without losing a single one that they're in, they will be greater than Brady.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
