Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    234
    Not good.

    Heart willing but body unable? Never thought I'd see this.

  2. #2
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Long defenders like that have always given Duncan trouble. This is not a first.

  3. #3
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    2,585
    Dude, it's only March.







    ^ Sarcasm
    Last edited by BonnerDynasty; 03-15-2008 at 08:32 PM.

  4. #4
    Groundhog Day TDfan2007's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    8,091
    Long defenders like that have always given Duncan trouble. This is not a first.
    In the past only KG and Rasheed gave Tim trouble. Now there are a good chunk of bigs that can shut him down on any given night...it's pathetic.

  5. #5
    Groundhog Day TDfan2007's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    8,091
    Oh and Tim used to abuse Dalembert.

  6. #6
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    234
    Dude, it's only March.
    Exactly. When was the last time they lost 5 of 6 in March or later?

    Duncan has always been able to make Dalembert his . Now its not looking so good.

  7. #7
    Lab Animal Capt Bringdown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    11,443
    Happens to everyone. Tim's old.

  8. #8
    Believe.
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    687
    In the past only KG and Rasheed gave Tim trouble. Now there are a good chunk of bigs that can shut him down on any given night...it's pathetic.
    Add Shaq (still and always), Yao, and Bogut.

  9. #9
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    You people make me vomit.

  10. #10
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    no one "owns" duncan. You guys just take his great production for granted a lot of the time.

  11. #11
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    234
    no one "owns" duncan. You guys just take his great production for granted a lot of the time.
    Was Duncan not Dalembert's tonight? Just calling it like I see it, and that was obvious. Who knows, maybe its the grueling schedule and Tim will be right after a bit of rest.

  12. #12
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Was Duncan not Dalembert's tonight? Just calling it like I see it, and that was obvious. Who knows, maybe its the grueling schedule and Tim will be right after a bit of rest.
    Yeah 8 games in 11 days would have NOTHING to do with it.

  13. #13
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    234
    Yeah 8 games in 11 days would have NOTHING to do with it.
    That's why I brought it up, jelly. I hope it is.

  14. #14
    Believe.
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    687
    No one owns him, but if you have a big with length and athleticism, you dont need to double Tim, which makes a huge difference in the overall complexion of the game.

    If you are the Pistons facing Tim in the Finals or Celtics (Rasheed and KG), you dont double and stay home on the shooters. Ditto for LA and Bynum. Or Phoenix (when Shaq is in the game). Or Houston if they had a healthy Yao. Ditto with NO and Chandler. You can at least contain Duncan now and prevent him from taking over.

    Tim is on the decline. He's nearly 32. It happens. But the Spurs are still good enough to win a le because of Manu/Parker/Popovich. Duncan's role just can't be as dominant as in years past.

    And while Shaq doesnt "own" Duncan he has got the better of him most of his career. Even last week, a 35 yr old s of his self Shaq frustrated and harassed Duncan into a brutal game.

  15. #15
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    That's why I brought it up, jelly. I hope it is.

    ?

    What are you 13?

  16. #16
    Believe.
    My Team
    Atlanta Hawks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    71
    Ducan did not whine to ref at all tonight. That's why he had problems. Ducan is at his best when he whines, or even shoves ref to ground. I miss that Duncan.

  17. #17
    Believe. The Nba Is Rigged's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    479
    He's only getting owned by the people who are supposed to own him no surprises here...

  18. #18
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    No one owns him, but if you have a big with length and athleticism, you dont need to double Tim, which makes a huge difference in the overall complexion of the game.

    If you are the Pistons facing Tim in the Finals or Celtics (Rasheed and KG), you dont double and stay home on the shooters. Ditto for LA and Bynum. Or Phoenix (when Shaq is in the game). Or Houston if they had a healthy Yao. Ditto with NO and Chandler. You can at least contain Duncan now and prevent him from taking over.

    Tim is on the decline. He's nearly 32. It happens. But the Spurs are still good enough to win a le because of Manu/Parker/Popovich. Duncan's role just can't be as dominant as in years past.

    And while Shaq doesnt "own" Duncan he has got the better of him most of his career. Even last week, a 35 yr old s of his self Shaq frustrated and harassed Duncan into a brutal game.
    How much did Shaq guard TD one on one in TD's prime though? Shaq may have the edge in series wins, but I don't think these two played against each other enough one on one to say one clearly had the edge.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •