Could a team of tiny men beat a team of giant women?

[Don Quixote]

The men would win by at the very least 70 points. The women would turn it over about 50 times resulting in layups for the men.

Yes, I think that would be the deciding factor. The height advantage the Chicks have over the Dudes would be nullified by the Dudes' greater strength, speed, and skill. Plus, the Dudes would all shoot better too. It wouldn't even be close if the Dudes decided to run.

[ABE LINCOLN]

the little guys aren't that strong. i bet brittney griner can outbench the guys combined

ladies for the win!

[Allanon]

Spudd Webb, Mugsy Bogues and Earl Boykins would be looking straight into so much pussy they wouldn't be able to concentrate.

Besides, the Munchkins would have to shoot contested jumpers all day long whereas the Giants would just post and throw it into the basket. You can't win a game when all of your shots have to come outside the paint against a team that will score 100% in the paint. Just look at all the leading FG% players, they're all big men.

WNBA wins.

[majinkoola]

Anyone who says the women would win, or have any sort of chance, hasn't seen or played in many games that include men and women. That, and they don't respect how amazingly good NBA players are. For the men, there wouldn't be much of a half court game. As I said before, the women would turn it over a bunch resulting in fast break points. Even when the ladies scored, the men could just inbound the ball quickly and beat them to the other end of the court. And the men could easily take into the paint and score on the women. Their verticals would negate the height.

[spurms]

all of the little men listed could dunk, margo dydek could barely get off her feet, and weight like what? 200lbs? could she even dunk? nope, the little men will run the ginatess ragged.

[lefty]

To answer the original question : NO

In fact, the Yao-less Rockets just lost to the Suns

[Brutalis]

maybe he meant god BLESS his soul

[sabar]

Women don't grow up the same as men. They become less talented because of it. Fact is, where do all the good coaches, GMs, trainers end up? The NBA. Then Euroleague, then minor leagues, then college, then the WNBA. Women get the table scraps, they'll never get to their full potential. A WNBA team would kill for Chip Engelland.

Plus, basketball doesn't hit broadly with women as with men, resulting in more talent wasted and lost. This is mostly a result of parents giving their daughters barbie dolls instead of a football or something. Kind of a self-destructive cycle, I'm glad I'm a male.

Because of stuff like this, the men will always win. If Kobe was born a female she'd be playing on a no-name WNBA team for a no-name coach under a no-name trainer. But he's a guy. He goes to the NBA and gets to play under excellect staff.

Contrary to popular belief, a lot of basketball is learned, and to learn the best, you need a good teacher. The NBA has all the teaching talent. It's the difference between going to an Ivy League school and community college. The talent is where the money is.

I'm sure there are women that could play in the NBA and with NBA training be much better players than they currently are now. It is the exact same reaosn why an NBA team will always beat a college team, a high school team. Even the NBA rookie or sophmore teams. They have better teachers. Coaches. Trainers. Give me 2 years with Chip Engelland and I could shoot free throws more accurately than a talented high school player.

People are born with the potential, not the skill. Same reason I can could send an 10 year old to college and they would have a higher IQ than a high school dropout. Better teachers.

So yeah, the men will win all the time.

[mojorizen7]

Thats a lot of sharp , little elbows being thrown around the crotch area.

[The Franchise]

Ladies win on second chance points.

[ShoogarBear]

Could Sequ beat Silver21_Black20 one-on-one?