Who would you rather have?

[mavs>spurs2]

Discuss.

[GuerillaBlack]

This thread fails.

[SCOLA4MVP]

Well i'm obviously a little biased being the biggest Scola fan, but even I have to adit i'd probably go with Turd.

Rockets for Life.

[word]

[mavsfan1000]

A turd of course.

[Mr.Bottomtooth]

Giant or turd sandwich?

[mavs>spurs2]

Seriously Scola is like the worst starter in the nba, at least the turd isn't expected to play big minutes. Plus the turd has better D because theres a better chance of an opposing player slipping on the turd rather than Scola getting a stop.

[BonnerDynasty]

Watching the Spurs go into scoring droughts followed by the defense cracking smells ty enough.

I'd take Scola.




Whoops nvm. Bonner is a defensive juggernaut.

[DAF86]

Seriously Scola is like the worst starter in the nba, at least the turd isn't expected to play big minutes. Plus the turd has better D because theres a better chance of an opposing player slipping on the turd rather than Scola getting a stop.

Seriously?...really?

[Vinnie_Johnson]

A big pile of crap

[DiRkGOHARD]

Turd is the truth

[Obstructed_View]

Turd had no buyout.

[ChuckD]

Turd had no buyout.

[mavs>spurs2]

Well there you have it Scola is the equivalent of a piece of . No defense, no real basketball moves, just moves around and tries to get layups off of tmacs playmaking abilities. He does hustle though, I guess I can give him that much credit.

[Mr.Bottomtooth]

Turd had no buyout.

owned.

[DiRkGOHARD]

Not enough hustle compared to Heath.