Reply With Quote
if he can only play 29 minutes
at allstar break you have to think about it
I say if he s around and plays -- trade him.
We don't need belly itches.
if he can only play 29 minutes
at allstar break you have to think about it
WTF, how about if he plays 30.90, do you still have to think about it at the all-star game, Mr. Ducks?
If Manu brings another ring in 2009, in a bizarro Finals Kobe fashion...there'll be a lot of crow to go around.
a big iff
and if spurs have jr smith all manu will need to put up is 15 a night
dude, i had to argue tooth and nail with a lot of spurs fan that he was injured. A lot of haters on this board
why are people so high on JR Smith? with his decision making, I can imagine Pop putting him in the doghouse very early, despite his athleticism.
I'd say Azubuike is the better athletic alternative. At least he doesn't seem like a dumbass.
Yeah, if he plays in the Olympics it only means good news.
If he's forced to sit out, then his injury is a long term injury and that doesn't bode well at all.
his decision making is a little worse then manu but manu forces to many bad shots
it is that he makes alto of them
rember pop lets manu do what manu does
normally he puts ruins in
with manu he lets loose
he could do the same with smith
Manu gambles and he's not afraid to fail.
JR Smith's bad shots are from something else. A la Sasha Vujacic.
JR Smith is a bad seed. I don't trust him.
jr smith ahead of that fellow called duncan
you do not trust him because he has not won your team a le
he has proven in playoffs he can go off against lakers and not afraid to shoot
jr smith is not afraid to fail just like manu
Who cares it's not like his Gawdy PER stats contributed to wins in a ty playoff series. That Denver squad was one of the stupidest ing teams in the history of the NBA.
oh and I trust pop is a better coach then karl
only because melo plays no d so rest of team does not
and if pop was on that team
they would have went to finals
Manu takes chances and he's god. J.R does and he's a bad seed? GTFOH
the only big difference between manu and jr smith
is manu has won at different leverals and jr smith has not
it is not jr smith fault he has karl for coach
oh and jr has some tattoos
jr smith has shot a very good percentage the last two years
I think even better then manu
Ya, he'd probably be more reliable like barry.
Well maybe if we do get him. He can dispel doubts. If he does more good than bad.
I just don't want dumbasses on the Spurs. I don't care if they're "thuggish" orwhatever, as long as they're a winner.
But I don't like dumb players, no matter how athletic they are.
dumb players are under 25
rember jr smith did not play for a living when manu was at his age
euro players should play smart then most usa players because they been playing longer for a living
oh and a healthy manu is greater then smith
Wow..it took you a couple posts to finally say something coherent and valuable!
Any Manu > Smith
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
