Reply With Quote
Just hold me you big lug.
Ok, this is going in my siggy at some point, as much as it make me wince.Too late for the Chancellor of Germany..
Just hold me you big lug.
he doesn't know he's the most repulsive person in the room.
Typical of lib s.
President Bush is bad because he doesn't stop N. Korea from testing nukes.
President Bush is bad because he doesn't do anything about Iran
Iraq has shown just cause to be bealt with.
President Bush is bad because he deals with Iraq.
Is there ever a reason not to blame president Bush?
I don't blame him for the dry brisket I had for lunch.
But, I blame you for spewing your -lust for Bush on this thread.
When did they explode a nuclear weapon?
Korea?
They had a failed test. A very expensive dirty bomb. That's all it turned out to be.
Then they posed a real threat.
wow. the n.koreans testing nukes on bush's watch. that is scary.
You know, an open mind is needed and people shouldn't jump to conclusions.
The test failed.
I'll bet nobody worried because we probably had someone inside operative who made it fail.
We will not know for some time if that is the case.
What were we to do? A pre-emptive strike against N. Korea, when all the demonrats and lib s are crying about Iraq?
Believe me. I do know a little about such things working the the "Nuclear Theater" for six years while I was in the service. I don't know the proper answers, but I do know they didn't just do nothing.
But, a pre-emptive strike against Iran is okay, regardless of the "demonrats and lib s"?
You're consistency is flawed.
Must I make the obvious arguments? Where do you get your news?
N. Korea had the potential of a threat if they had a sucessful bomb that could be sold. They were not a threat until they had an actual working bomb.
Iran is the same for a threat, except.... The president of Iran has vowed to destroy Israel!
Why don't we take action?
We won't have to. Israel will take action if they must, and they have far better intelligence in the region than we do. They have a vested interest in their security. If someday they strike Iran, you'll know why.
my antenna sucks.Believe me. I do know a little about such things working the the "Nuclear Theater" for six years while I was in the service.
So, you're saying we shouldn't take action against Iran?
I just want clarification.
Why do you sall try to pin people down to absolute answers to general questions?
In the case of nuke's, no. We should let Israel take the lead. There are other reasons to possibly deal with Iran in the future. Their support of terrorism.
Yes, we may have to deal with them, but in the aspect of global terrorism. Not about nukes. Again, Israel is their first target if they get 'the bomb' so I say let Israel deal with them. I say the only way ge get involved with Iran over nukes is if Israel asks for our help.
ahahahahahahaToo late for the Chancellor of Germany..
STILL funny.
Once the bombs and missiles start falling do you really think Iran is gonna pause and care over who is bombing them? No...they're gonna let their short, medium and long range missiles fly to Israel, to the Green Zone in Iraq, to ships sailing in the Gulf and to other American bases throughout the Middle east....
A missile to far...
LinkyAs news spread across the world of Iran’s provocative missile tests, so did an image of four missiles heading skyward in unison. Unfortunately, it appeared to contain one too many missiles, a fact that had not emerged before the photo appeared on the front pages of The Los Angeles Times, The Financial Times, The Chicago Tribune and several other newspapers as well as on BBC News, MSNBC, Yahoo! News, NYTimes.com and many other major news Web sites.
... the second missile from the right appears to be the sum of two other missiles in the image. The contours of the billowing smoke match perfectly near the ground, as well in the immediate wake of the missile. Only a small black dot in the reddish area of exhaust seems to differ from the missile to its left, though there are also some slight variations in the color of the smoke and the sky.
... Agence France-Presse retracted its four-missile version this morning, saying that the image of four missiles was “apparently digitally altered” by Iranian state media. The fourth missile “has apparently been added in digital retouch to cover a grounded missile that may have failed during the test,” the agency said.
Here's the cropped versions...
Picture from a Iranian new site:
Actual image: (but who knows for sure)
Not actual image, but why stop at 4?
And finally, actual image....if the missiles were built by NASA...
How many missiles do you think they have and how accurate do you think they will be? Obviously you think they have a great number of missiles and can strike with great accuracy.
You ever stop to think that there may be a little obstacle to their missile offensive, called Patriot. I feel fairly certain the Patriot has been improved since it last use. Don't you?
Bring 'em on!!!!!!
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!
No, Iraq.
The answer is never.
The Iraq threat turned out to be no threat at all.
Why don't the resident conservatives just man up and admit they want to bomb everyone they don't like.. anyone who says something bad about the USA? let's bomb 'em!
IRAN MISSILE TEST BIG BLUFF: OLD ROCKETS, BOGUS VIDEO
Fri Jul 11 2008 15:18:02 ET
Many of Iran's claims related to missile tests during "Great Prophet III" war games -- appear to be smoke and mirrors!
The missiles tested DID NOT not have 2,000-kilometer range, the NEW YORK TIMES is planning to report on Saturday. It was no Shahab-3 missile, able to reach Israel. It was an older missile that was out of production, newsroom sources tell DRUDGE.
A video showed what appeared to be many missiles being fired is actually one missile, filmed from different angles.
NYT's Bill Broad is planning to quote Pentagon officials and military insiders.
but,but,but they said some bad stuff about us and our friends... there is a reason why conservatives are dying breed...
Because the "imminent threat" propaganda worked in 2004.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
