The kids willing to play one on one has nothing to do with my question. I'm sure there are plenty of kids that would want to. What does it teach them? What lessons are they learning? There are plenty of camps run by NBA players and former NBA players and they don't play one-on-one with the camp kids. It serves no purpose in helping the kids get better. Whether it's entertaining watching Michael Jordan shoot jumpers over kids, giving them head and shoulder fakes, and then driving and dunking on them is a matter of opinion. I find it amusing in that it looks lame, not entertaining. You think it's cool. Other people in this thread thinks it's the highlight of some of these kids' lives. I don't. You're not changing my opinion of it. So, you don't need to try to convince me that it's not lame. It's an opinion.
For me, it would be entertaining enough to get some one on one lessons from Michael Jordan, having him help me with my jump shooting form, teaching me some tricks of the trade on positioning, form, technique, and what not without him having to show off that he can still hit jumpers and drive on kids that are no where near NBA caliber. It would be enough to shoot jumpers with him, talk to him while he gave me advice on my game.
What's the purpose of going one-on-one? The best answer in this thread is that it's entertaining. LOL, ok.
You don't like the football comparison, fine. If Charles Barkley held a camp and did the same thing, backing down kids 200 pounds lighter than him in the post and scoring on them, would that be fun too? If Dominique held a camp and had a sessions where kids had to stand in the lane and take charges on him while he tried to jump over them and dunk on them, would that be fun too?
It's comical to me. Amusing that Michael Jordan would go one-on-one against kids, not only shoot jumpers, but give them shoulder fakes as if he needed to create space to shoot over them, drive on these kids, and then after dunking talk to the crowd.
Entertaining... sure. In very lame way.